|
||||||||
Witness for the prosecution |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#276 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
|
Quote:
Personally, I feel that some of the criticisms have been a bit harsh.
It was my cuppa tea, and I preferred it to a lot (well, most really!) of the usual Christmas stuff. Thinking about it, perhaps Kim Catrall was a bit too attractive to be a sex-starved rich widow/spinster in the public's view, and so Vole's role as her killer was less believable? Dunno. But I enjoyed it for what it was; even the 'greenish' tinge earlier. I wonder why Agatha Christie is held in such high esteem? The ''Golden Age'' of crime novelists also include Margery Allingham: Ngaio Marsh, and Dorothy Sayers, whom I prefer to Agatha tbh I don't suppose any of them would be considered particularly perceptive about the human condition these days, but I s'pose it all depends what you want from your drama. And surely some people are taking the mickey by saying that WFTP was better then last years ATTWN. Mind you, I disagree with what someone said that ATTWN is much harder to do justice/make work on film. Much more characters and a very creepy atmosphere to work with. WFTP is much more straightforward, hence it being originally a short story (and play, just like three blind mice/the mousetrap), and why in different versions characters even had to be added to pad it out. Also, WFTP hinges on the twist and they cheated a bit here by scarring the face (and even then some people recognized her). |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#277 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 515
|
Wish I hadn't wasted my time watching this tripe. Far too many twists and turns, sometimes writers just try too hard to be interesting and fail miserably. And all the coughing and spluttering made me feel sick, especially when he coughed phlegm all over his poor wife's face mid-hump. Terrible programme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 268
|
The reason an Agatha Christie tale is good is because there is never too much realism... It's all a bit fluffy and far fetched and the enjoyment is in solving the riddle.
The tragedy of Mayhew and his wife (though well acted) took it into another area - one I certainly didn't want to to go to! |
|
|
|
|
|
#279 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 5,729
|
Quote:
There was a 1982 tv movie version made by CBS with Ralph Richardson in the Charles Laugton role
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witnes...on_(1982_film) That was only 97 minutes long. The BBC version could have even shorter if they had cut out all the completely irrelevant nonsense about Mayhew's family life and all his coughing He never coughed in Court though which I found quite amusing not to mention unbelievable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#281 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Between Wales and Liverpool
Posts: 14
|
I had no previous experience of the story and really enjoyed it. Subtitles weren't needed (for once). I understood the smog outside (peasouper) and the fug inside (gaslamps). The contrast to the wonderful sunny Le Touquet was great.
I thought Janet might get away with 'balance of the mind disturbed' rather than hanging, but she did kill the cat ..... I have done shouting at the television in the past when a book has been changed, so can understand some of the disappointment in this thread - but in my case ignorance was bliss. |
|
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,348
|
Vole only said he was "Going Abroad", so are we supposed to believe that Mayhew took his wife on holiday some months/years later, & just happened to come across them getting married?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#283 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,605
|
It seems to have been reviewed well, not that reviews are everything, it's just nice to know i'm not crazy for thinking it was really good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#284 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,499
|
i'm surprised the evidence was all circumstancial, they never investigated if the star HAD been disfigured by mrs vole or try to interview her, saying mr vole had an affair with her husband which they didn't investigate either. they didn't ask the rest of the cast what happened#
where did they get mrs voles letter to her lover? Don't think they swore like that back then either. my bloody but not the f word. surely Agatha didn't write that ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,361
|
Quote:
The reason an Agatha Christie tale is good is because there is never too much realism... It's all a bit fluffy and far fetched and the enjoyment is in solving the riddle.
The tragedy of Mayhew and his wife (though well acted) took it into another area - one I certainly didn't want to to go to! |
|
|
|
|
|
#286 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: I'm a she not a he.
Posts: 3,192
|
I enjoyed the second episode more than the first, but it really wasn't what most people expect from an Agatha Christie story. For Christmas, I would have preferred something less gratuitous and more true to the original AC story.
Toby Jones was terrific, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,565
|
Quote:
I'm astounded that the Christie family have allowed Agatha's name to this adaptation. The gratuitous scenes which I would quite happily watch on a US "made for TV movie" has not place in Christie dramas. As a total Christie fan I'm saddened by the BBC chasing the ratings by putting in sex and violence explicitly, ITV Poirot and Marple are far superior. Really NOT Christmas Day viewing.
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,612
|
I agree with the 'ignorance is bliss comments'. I thought it was a great drama. Part 2 packed more punch than the first.
However, there have been novels that I love that have been painful to watch on TV due to appalling adaptation, so I can completely understand why people didn't like it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,605
|
Quote:
I agree with the 'ignorance is bliss comments'. I thought it was a great drama. Part 2 packed more punch than the first.
However, there have been novels that I love that have been painful to watch on TV due to appalling adaptation, so I can completely understand why people didn't like it. My current worst offender is the Hobbit, awful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Oxfordshire
Posts: 11,632
|
I enjoyed it, the production values and period were superb, but it strayed far too far away from Christie's style or imprint. I don't mean they should not have embellished it, it's just that the new bits were not remotely what Christie would have written back then or now, were she alive.
It also lost power because for some reason this version switched the key protagonist from the barrister who grills each witness in court, to a lowly solicitor who does not, cannot, because solicitors may not represent their clients before judges. I can't think why producers let this pass, it watered down the whole thing. In addition, this very non-Christie back story about the son in the Great War was utter drivel, the worst kind of bad psychology and totally irrelevant. In the fabulous 1957 classic film version, to meet the film ethics rules of the day, the barrister is devastated but the subsequent action in the courtroom after the case resolves the ethical issues and immediately provides him with a reason to bring an element of the case back into court and for him to potentially triumph beyond the end of the film. I am not revealing what it was here in case you watch it, as it is a much more satisfactory ending. In this version Mathew walked into the sea but probably mostly because of his personal life, the reasons were too complex and too confused. This version also threw away the great dramatic triumph of the 1957 movie. Marlene Dietrich, the greatest ever German star of the previous 25 years, could only speak English with a noticeable heavy accent and had one of the most distinctive voices - and faces - in the world. So when she appeared in full vision as the Other Woman, scarred, speaking in broad Cockney (which she performed herself) cinema goers totally failed to recognise her and could not believe it had been her, hence she repeated her famous line 'Wanba kiss me, ducky' in court. It was a stunning denouement. Of course, Andrea Riseborough can perfectly navigate the accents because she is English, but in 1957 that a German speaker (and a Hollywood make up team) could do so was a major plot misdirection and caused a sensation. But I still liked it and always welcome lavish period drama with great casts and anything by Christie, even if I know the culprit from the start. |
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,077
|
Quote:
I wonder why Agatha Christie is held in such high esteem? The ''Golden Age'' of crime novelists also include Margery Allingham: Ngaio Marsh, and Dorothy Sayers, whom I prefer to Agatha tbh I don't suppose any of them would be considered particularly perceptive about the human condition these days, but I s'pose it all depends what you want from your drama. Roderick Alleyn, Albert Campion, and my beloved Lord Peter have all had series in the past, but are very much overdue for renewal. Though they'd have to get Peter and Harriet right, or I'd be seriously annoyed. They managed perfectly last time. ![]() Quote:
I had a real hatred of the Prisoner of Azkaban, it's my favourite Harry Potter book, and it's regarded by many as the best film. But I hated it because it missed so much out. It has taught me to at least try and accept an adaptation as it's own thing, and I have come to really like it as a film. I still think it's a terrible adaptation though.
My current worst offender is the Hobbit, awful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#292 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 208
|
Disappointing. Should have been cut down to one full length episode rather than 2
Could have been so much better with a cast of that quality |
|
|
|
|
|
#293 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,885
|
Quote:
Disappointing. Should have been cut down to one full length episode rather than 2
Could have been so much better with a cast of that quality |
|
|
|
|
|
#294 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 515
|
Quote:
definitely could've been just one feature length episode....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#295 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Honiton, Devon
Posts: 1,930
|
Quote:
. Really NOT Christmas Day viewing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#296 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Honiton, Devon
Posts: 1,930
|
Quote:
Though they'd have to get Peter and Harriet right, or I'd be seriously annoyed. They managed perfectly last time. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#297 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 15,470
|
Watched it in Belgium over the holiday - we all thought it superb - attention to the period details were first class ( as it is always with the BBC ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#298 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Honiton, Devon
Posts: 1,930
|
Quote:
i'm surprised the evidence was all circumstancial, they never investigated if the star HAD been disfigured by mrs vole or try to interview her, saying mr vole had an affair with her husband which they didn't investigate either. they didn't ask the rest of the cast what happened#
where did they get mrs voles letter to her lover? Don't think they swore like that back then either. my bloody but not the f word. surely Agatha didn't write that ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Honiton, Devon
Posts: 1,930
|
Quote:
Vole only said he was "Going Abroad", so are we supposed to believe that Mayhew took his wife on holiday some months/years later, & just happened to come across them getting married?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#300 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,885
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18.





