|
||||||||
Inside Chernobyl's Mega Tomb - BBC4 |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 37,020
|
Inside Chernobyl's Mega Tomb - BBC4
Jaw-dropping stuff. Must-see for atomic junkies.
That build is like something out of the Jodie Foster movie, Contact. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 688
|
incredible engineering feat that nearly came a cropper due to some barbed wire
![]() glad to see it was a success but will it contain the radiation??? thats the big question |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
incredible engineering feat that nearly came a cropper due to some barbed wire
![]() glad to see it was a success but will it contain the radiation??? thats the big question |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Waterford Ireland
Posts: 8,844
|
Interesting and vital project, makes me wish I'd been good at maths, structural engineering is one of the jobs of the era. Projects now are being done on such a scale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 159
|
Fascinating prog.
Very high tech stuff, apart from using bog standard mild steel for the roof with the resultant corrosion problems, I thought they might have used special alloys, carbon fibre or aluminium, although it is a huge structure so maybe only steel will do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 31,156
|
Spotted this by accident and missed a chunk of it, really good bit of TV.
When my downloader program unbuggers itself I'll download the program. As a very dull person, I could watch 3 or 4 hours about that project, the whole design and build process, strand jacking, skidding etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,115
|
Classic BBC4 fodder. Informative and fascinating. Love it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
Fascinating prog.
Very high tech stuff, apart from using bog standard mild steel for the roof with the resultant corrosion problems, I thought they might have used special alloys, carbon fibre or aluminium, although it is a huge structure so maybe only steel will do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Up North
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
I'm sure I heard them say it was stainless steel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 31,156
|
Heavy structural steel will probably be mild, cladding stainless.
For those passing by who won't have a clue what this is about: Documentary which follows the construction of a trailblazing 36,000-tonne steel structure to entomb the ruins of the nuclear power plant destroyed in the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. It films close up with the team of international engineers as they race to build the new structure before Chernobyl's original concrete sarcophagus - the hastily built structure that covers the reactor - collapses. Built to last just thirty years, the temporary sarcophagus is now crumbling, putting the world at risk of another release of radioactive dust. Radiation levels make it impossible for workers to build the new shelter directly over the old reactor, so engineers are erecting the new megastructure - taller than the tower of Big Ben and three times heavier than the Eiffel Tower - to one side and will then face the challenge of sliding the largest object ever moved on land into place over the old reactor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 37,020
|
50mm clearance was the bit that blew my mind! Heroic stuff all round. They must've been on quadruple bubble for that gig.
Wish it'd been longer. Reminded me a lot of that show from a few years back that I loved - Monster Moves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 159
|
I missed the explanation for using sliding pads and hydraulic rams [ and lots of aerosols of Pledge it seemed ] to move the arch rather than good old fashioned round things called wheels that have served us rather well for millennia.
Or were they just being French, with lashings of flamboyant Gallic contrariness ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 37,020
|
Quote:
I missed the explanation for using sliding pads and hydraulic rams [ and lots of aerosols of Pledge it seemed ] to move the arch rather than good old fashioned round things called wheels that have served us rather well for millennia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Middle England
Posts: 991
|
I missed the explanation of what they were planning to do with the reactor core.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 12,731
|
Just watched it on iPlayer, fantastic documentary. The entire team that committed to build a structure designed to secure the health of both nature and human deserve all the recognition in the world. Truly fascinating stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 254
|
Quote:
50mm clearance was the bit that blew my mind!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 37,020
|
I think you're right......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
I thought it was 50cm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Location: Location
Posts: 4,214
|
Interesting stuff, especially the explanation for why they are installing air conditioning to preserve the steel structure for as long as possible as it will be too radioactive inside the dome to repaint once in position. Although it doesn't explain how they make repairs to the cranes and other equipment as I doubt they will last 100 years.
Didn't recognise the narrator as Helen Baxendale. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,652
|
Fascinating. Thanks just caught it on catch up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 4,979
|
I spotted this last night in enough time to stick on record but thought what an obscure weird time to schedule it. I've not viewed yet but judging by the posts i'm not going to be disappointed.
I've long wanted to go and visit and looked at lots of YT clips on it. Some are really well made and filmed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Up North
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
Interesting stuff, especially the explanation for why they are installing air conditioning to preserve the steel structure for as long as possible as it will be too radioactive inside the dome to repaint once in position. Although it doesn't explain how they make repairs to the cranes and other equipment as I doubt they will last 100 years.
As I understand it the choice of mild steel was not dictated by cost so much as strength vs. weight. Greater corrosion allowances or the use of stainless steel would have added to the weight which could quickly have become self-defeating and nigh on impossible to move at seven times the weight of the crawlers used at Cape Canaveral. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 31,156
|
Quote:
I missed the explanation for using sliding pads and hydraulic rams [ and lots of aerosols of Pledge it seemed ] to move the arch rather than good old fashioned round things called wheels that have served us rather well for millennia.
Or were they just being French, with lashings of flamboyant Gallic contrariness ? Quote:
Axles wouldn't take the weight.
Don't know how many axles it would take to move that on SPMT's but it would be in the hundreds I guess. Just worked it out, using Mammoet's current kit 44 tonne per axle, 818 axles, then you've got to get it on/off the SMPT's. ALE's youtube channel, if you're really bored, a company from over here doing rather well everywhere, to paraphrase Hanson's old advert. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
I'm sure I heard them say it was stainless steel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
Skidding is a regular tool used in the heavy lifting and shifting game has been probably since the industrial revolution, I'd guess, nothing Gallic about it, see Mammoet's, VSL's or ALE's websites.
Don't know how many axles it would take to move that on SPMT's but it would be in the hundreds I guess. Just worked it out, using Mammoet's current kit 44 tonne per axle, 818 axles, then you've got to get it on/off the SMPT's. ALE's youtube channel, if you're really bored, a company from over here doing rather well everywhere, to paraphrase Hanson's old advert. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:49.



