DS Forums

 
 

Massive UK foreign aid budget subsidises Ethiopean Spice Girls !


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-12-2016, 21:21
Happ Hazzard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
Those are smaller/much less populated countries. Our foreign aid budget is one of the highest in the world. We simply can't afford it. Axe it and if people feel so strongly about it, let them donate their own money to charity instead of expecting other people to stump up.
Happ Hazzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-12-2016, 21:41
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,490
Those are smaller/much less populated countries. Our foreign aid budget is one of the highest in the world. We simply can't afford it. Axe it and if people feel so strongly about it, let them donate their own money to charity instead of expecting other people to stump up.
It is our money
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:43
Mark_Jones9
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6,834
Those are smaller/much less populated countries. Our foreign aid budget is one of the highest in the world. We simply can't afford it. Axe it and if people feel so strongly about it, let them donate their own money to charity instead of expecting other people to stump up.
The UK government gives 7p in foreign aid per £10 GDP. We are not giving up much.
And what the UK gives makes a vast difference to the lives of the poorest people in the world.

Some of the things UK foreign aid has achieved
64.5 million people provided with clean drinking water and sanitation.
67.1 million children immunized against preventable diseases.
30 million pregnant women and children under 5 years old given assistance through nutritional programmes.
11.3 million children provided with primary and lower secondary school education.
9.9 million women provided with family planning contraception.

Without UK foreign aid it is likely tens of millions of people would have died.
Mark_Jones9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:43
Happ Hazzard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
Some of it is your money. Personally I would rather my taxes went to help people in this country, and pay less tax overall.
Happ Hazzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:45
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,490
Some of it is your money. Personally I would rather my taxes went to help people in this country, and pay less tax overall.
So vote for someone offering that choice.

Personally I would be happy to pay more tax to help people both here and abroad.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:50
Happ Hazzard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
Just give the extra money you would be willing to pay in tax, to charity instead.
Happ Hazzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:52
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,490
Just give the extra money you would be willing to pay in tax, to charity instead.
I give a reasonable amount to charity and pay a large amount of tax. I have no issue with some of it going on foreign aid.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:54
Happ Hazzard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
But you think that taxes should be raised meaning that everyone would pay more so that more money can be sent to foreign countries. Not everyone has enough money to be able to afford this.
Happ Hazzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:55
Mark_Jones9
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6,834
Just give the extra money you would be willing to pay in tax, to charity instead.
The reason tax is not voluntary is because their are too many selfish people who would be unwilling to pay.
Mark_Jones9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 21:59
Mark_Jones9
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6,834
But you think that taxes should be raised meaning that everyone would pay more so that more money can be sent to foreign countries. Not everyone has enough money to be able to afford this.
The UK in theory has a progressive tax system and has government spending on benefits and services. The majority of the population are net beneficiaries receiving more in benefits and state services than they pay in taxes. Leaving only those most able to pay footing the bill for government spending at home and abroad.
Mark_Jones9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 22:04
Happ Hazzard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
The reason tax is not voluntary is because their are too many selfish people who would be unwilling to pay.
I wasn't advocating tax being voluntarily. Just that we should be a bit more selective of what we spend the money on. I don't think subsidising Ethiopian girl groups is a reasonable thing for UK taxpayers money to be spent on.
Happ Hazzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 22:19
Mark_Jones9
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6,834
I wasn't advocating tax being voluntarily. Just that we should be a bit more selective of what we spend the money on. I don't think subsidising Ethiopian girl groups is a reasonable thing for UK taxpayers money to be spent on.
Why if its a cost effective means of changing culture?
Reducing population growth through fewer marriages at a young age and fewer pregnancies at a young age.
Increasing propensity through more girls attending and staying on in education.
Improving lives through fewer forced marriages, less violence against girls and women, more financial independence of women.

The value for money is going to be assessed based on if more girls are attending and staying in school, if there are lower rates of marriages at a young age, if there are less pregnancies at a young age, etc.

Yegna is not just a girl band, the girl band is part of the Girl Effect Yegna multi-platform youth brand. That encompasses films, a radio drama, a radio talk show, a girl band/music, and outreach programmes particularly in rural areas aimed at educating and empowering adolescent girls. A brand that has over 2 million viewers and nearly 2 million listeners. The money is for the entire Girl Effect Yegna multi-platform youth brand.
Mark_Jones9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 22:27
i4u
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 30,189
Yep, the exceptions being our own sick, old and disabled who no one seems to give a toss about.
NHS England...Planned expenditure for 2016/17 is £120.611bn. Health expenditure per capita in England has risen from to £2,057 in 2014/15.

Overall, missed GP and hospital appointments cost the health service in England nearly £1bn a year.

State pension...The Government already spends more than £100 billion a year on pension-age benefits, around one seventh of all public spending.

Disabled....costs will still increase according to the OBR - to £17.7bn in 2019-20 and £18.2bn in 2020-21.

Someone to the tune of around £240bn cares.
i4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 22:42
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,490
But you think that taxes should be raised meaning that everyone would pay more so that more money can be sent to foreign countries. Not everyone has enough money to be able to afford this.
I said I would be happy to pay more tax. I don't know if there is a need too.

Not everyone has enough money to pay for our NHS, welfare or disabled, funny enough they don't usually pay at all, and leaving the disabled out of this it is the poor who use the NHS more and receive the benefits.

How would you feel if everyone who pays tax decided they didn't want to spend it on that, just so that they paid less tax?
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 22:44
Happ Hazzard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
Everyone pays tax in this country and the majority of people use the NHS so I don't believe that is likely to happen.
Happ Hazzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 22:49
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,490
Everyone pays tax in this country and the majority of people use the NHS so I don't believe that is likely to happen.
Everyone is not a net contributor.

I do agree that it isn't likely to happen. People care and understand the benefit of offering aid, both national and foreign.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 23:07
i4u
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 30,189
Everyone pays tax in this country and the majority of people use the NHS so I don't believe that is likely to happen.
But the taxes they pay are not sufficient for what they/we get in return.

Someone on the average income of £26,500 would pay just over £3,000 in income tax. The State pension is over £6,000 year.

A person would have had to work for at least 40 years at the current average income to pay for their State Pension lasting 20 years.
i4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 23:16
Thiswillbefun
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,582
Our EU partners Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark, Netherlands give a higher percentage of their GDP in foreign aid than the UK.
That's shocking! How dare they make the UK look bad by being so generous and considerate?
Thiswillbefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 23:17
Happ Hazzard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 1,639
Regardless, ever citizen of this country is entitled to one vote, no matter how much tax they pay. And everyone is entitled to have a say on what taxes are spent on. Most people support the NHS. Most people do not support subsidising Ethiopian girl groups.
Happ Hazzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2016, 23:50
i4u
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 30,189
Regardless, ever citizen of this country is entitled to one vote, no matter how much tax they pay. And everyone is entitled to have a say on what taxes are spent on. Most people support the NHS. Most people do not support subsidising Ethiopian girl groups.
And with their votes the public elected into power a party that promised to maintain its Foreign AId programme.

Aid helps prevent failed states from becoming havens for terrorists. It builds long-term markets for our businesses, by promoting global prosperity, and reduces migration pressures. So we will maintain our commitment to tackling conflict, poverty and disease around the world.
i4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2016, 06:56
i4u
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 30,189
Last Saturday hard done by Brits were estimated to have spent £2.6bn on Christmas cards alone, kicking off a total of £17.6bn of spending on cards.

The poor British public are expected to have spent over £25bn on festive food for Christmas.
i4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2016, 08:53
TommyNooka
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,473
Last Saturday hard done by Brits were estimated to have spent £2.6bn on Christmas cards alone, kicking off a total of £17.6bn of spending on cards.

The poor British public are expected to have spent over £25bn on festive food for Christmas.
Did you pull those figures out of your backside?

The TOY industry is only worth £3bn so there's not a chance that £2.5bn has been spent on Xmas cards and £25bn on food??

Utter nonsense!! You've been on the
TommyNooka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2016, 09:01
Aetius_Maralas
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 719
Some of it is your money. Personally I would rather my taxes went to help people in this country, and pay less tax overall.
So they could come onto DS and whine about immigrants?
Aetius_Maralas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2016, 09:49
AnotherPOV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 696
I expect because in general we are known as a caring nation with caring people.

Of course, there are always exceptions.
More like we are a nation of mugs with a soft touch government.
AnotherPOV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2016, 09:52
jmclaugh
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 47,995
Our EU partners Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark, Netherlands give a higher percentage of their GDP in foreign aid than the UK.
They do. The UK's 0.7% of GDP legal target is all well and good if you aren't borrowing tens of billions to finance public spending and cutting domestic spending. A more sensible target would be a % of public spending not GDP as the government doesn't have the value of the UK's GDP at its disposal to spend. The UK spends about 1.6% of public spending on overseas aid and it also contributes separately to the EU's overseas aid through its contributions to the EU budget.
jmclaugh is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:12.