|
||||||||
The Case Of Jonbenet Ramsey. More 4. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,806
|
The Case Of Jonbenet Ramsey. More 4.
This is a new documentary made recently by CBS in America and shown over 2 nights at 9pm on More 4, tonight and tomorrow. May be interesting. Experts try to solve the case once and for all, 20 years after she died aged 6.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 91,283
|
I doubt they will ever find out what really happened , the police messed up everything in the beginning when they didnt search the house properly before leaving , only to come back to a house full of people and the Mother holding Jonbenet after moving the body.
I guess its one of two things , the family did it or someone broke in through the grate in the basement where the body was found , ive seen loads of documentaries where there are cases for either |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 159
|
Has there ever been more inconclusive and speculative TV airtime spent on a single murder case as Jonbenet's ?
I'll end up watching it, but, I guarantee, it will come up with nothing new. It shows how unscientific the study of handwriting can be when dozens of "experts" can't agree on who wrote the ransom note, Mum ? Dad ? or both ? or an intruder ? It's the key to the case, but no-one can ID the author of the longest, rambling, incoherent, ransom note in criminal history. I agree about the botched crime scene, but to be fair, it was a missing person first, THEN it became a murder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,040
|
Quite interesting so far. I'm sure there won't be any revelations but it's interesting seeing the voice and letter analysis.
The dispatcher who answered the 911 call was complaining that she wasn't called as a witness, but I don't see why she would have been. The tape records the facts of the call. Anything else (like her stating the call "seemed" strange) is just her opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
Quite interesting so far. I'm sure there won't be any revelations but it's interesting seeing the voice and letter analysis.
The dispatcher who answered the 911 call was complaining that she wasn't called as a witness, but I don't see why she would have been. The tape records the facts of the call. Anything else (like her stating the call "seemed" strange) is just her opinion. Her opinion is of no import really. The enhanced 6 seconds of the 911 call ? sorry I didn't make out any human speech at all . |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,040
|
Quote:
The enhanced 6 seconds of the 911 call ? sorry I didn't make out any human speech at all .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11,776
|
This is a terrible thing to say, given this is about the murder of a real child, but all the programme is making me think about is why murder mysteries are so popular - they can manipulate the ending to make it complete. This obviously isn't going to tell us anything new or we would know from when it was on in the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 159
|
The flashlight evidence is interesting, I've got one like it in the car for emergencies, and it's a formidable blunt instrument, bloody heavy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 114
|
I didn't know that Patsy had studied journalism.
Did make me wonder about the ransom note which the police found and other screwed up pieces of paper which were written before the main one which was left. The ransom note was very dramatic almost like someone had written a crime story. They said in this documentary that some words had been taken from a film but I didn't pick up which film it was? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,806
|
Seems like they're going to come to the conclusion that one of the family did it, probably the boy, who was 9 then so will be 29 now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 20
|
Thanks for the heads up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
Agreed, she also would say that elements of the call seemed strange ,....... in hindsight.
Her opinion is of no import really. The enhanced 6 seconds of the 911 call ? sorry I didn't make out any human speech at all . If she has certain instincts that something strange was happening when the caller went silent, then it may help the police to look in a certain direction. A statement from her at the time may have triggered something in a police officer that could help the investigation. At worst, interviewing her would do no harm. But it took 120 days to interview the parents, so there was no chance that she would be interviewed. It's actually very shocking, and stinks of corruption. The fact that the whole community could be silenced so effectively is unbelievable. Even today they remain silent. The voices in the enhanced 911 call were loud and clear, and it's shocking that those voices weren't picked up 20 years ago. Technology would not have been limited in this area. If they had interviewed the 911 call taker 20 years ago, they would have been alerted that there were probably/certainly other peoples voices in the background, and then they could have enhanced the recording properly, knowing there was something there. I have never heard of this case before, and found the documentary very interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,106
|
Quote:
They said in this documentary that some words had been taken from a film but I didn't pick up which film it was?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 23
|
I found the documentary fascinating despite falling asleep for the last half an hour! (Did I miss anything, it was the forensic guy talking and I was pondering his age and the fact he had an upper cut... trendy)
The ransom note is such a curious thing... pages long and written on site, it does lead me to think that the family are involved and I will be interested to see what Part 2 brings tonight, although that will be watched on catchup next week! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,806
|
Quote:
But it took 120 days to interview the parents, so there was no chance that she would be interviewed. It's actually very shocking, and stinks of corruption.
I have never heard of this case before, and found the documentary very interesting. Does anyone know why it took them months to interview the parents? In any murder the people actually in the house are prime suspects so they should have been interviewed down at the cop shop that day or next day. Sheer incompetance on the police's part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,806
|
Quote:
I found the documentary fascinating despite falling asleep for the last half an hour! (Did I miss anything, it was the forensic guy talking and I was pondering his age and the fact he had an upper cut... trendy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,473
|
There have been a few documentaries and articles about this case over the years which have led me to conclude that the brother must have killed his sister (even adults don't realise that it only takes one bang on the head to kill someone!) and the parents covered it up. In this documentary they haven't mentioned that there were NO footprints in the snow around the house and nobody has mentioned the time of death. The police didn't have control of much (and THAT needs to be addressed) but they did have a corpse to autopsy so surely somebody could hazard a guess at the time of death? The phone call was at 5.50-ish and the "ransom note" (who wrote THAT?) took 25 minutes to write (and there had been previous drafts, found at the scene) so we must be talking hours between death and contacting the police. The torch which they are taking to be the weapon seems an odd thing to be sitting on a kitchen counter. Many homes have torches, but they are usually kept somewhere specific, not left on a kitchen work surface. Why had the family been using a torch that evening?
I'm guessing that many people knew or suspected that the brother was responsible but since the parents would not want to pursue this line of enquiry and were not willing (or obliged, apparently) to cooperate in any way everything was let slide. It will be interesting to find out what the father and son are doing nowadays. The brother is, apparently, trying to sue the forensic pathologist and the documentary-makers for $100,000,000 for pointing the finger at him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,806
|
Quote:
I'm guessing that many people knew or suspected that the brother was responsible but since the parents would not want to pursue this line of enquiry and were not willing (or obliged, apparently) to cooperated in any way everything was let slide. It will be interesting to find out what the father and son are doing nowadays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 4,290
|
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/179578...day-of-murder/
This was an interview Burke did with Dr Phil . I was surprised how their close freinds turned on them . |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,297
|
Quote:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/179578...day-of-murder/
This was an interview Burke did with Dr Phil . I was surprised how their close freinds turned on them . |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,550
|
They haven't mentioned the older half brother yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,040
|
If Burke did cause her death (either accidentally or deliberately) and the family had been honest from the start, he would have already served his time in juvenile detention and be a free man now, the case would be closed and justice would have been served for JonBenet.
I can understand the instinct of parents to protect their child if he/she accidentally causes the death of a sibling, however to stage such an elaborate lie and maintain it for a lifetime was a huge gamble. Thanks to the inadequate investigation at the time and, it seems, their own influence with the authorities, they have been able to get away with it. However, Burke and his father will always live under the shadow of suspicion and there must be times when they wonder if that is really a better life than being honest from the start and serving time. Burke has no choice but to support the 'story' created by his parents (at least, while his father is still alive). I wonder if, after his father dies, he may be tempted one day to reveal the truth about what happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,806
|
Quote:
If Burke did cause her death (either accidentally or deliberately) and the family had been honest from the start, he would have already served his time in juvenile detention and be a free man now, the case would be closed and justice would have been served for JonBenet.
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 159
|
So, Burke accidentally kills Jonbenet, the kidnapping ruse is thought up, the ransom note written, so far so good, why dial 911 with the body still in the house ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,040
|
Quote:
So, Burke accidentally kills Jonbenet, the kidnapping ruse is thought up, the ransom note written, so far so good, why dial 911 with the body still in the house ?
Being Christmas time, her absence would soon become apparent to family and friends. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11.


