|
||||||||
Are Brexiters realising that to oppose is a lot easier than to govern and deliver ? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 19,783
|
Quote:
I take it you're one of those foaming-at-the-mouth Brexit-at-all-costs sort of person. That would explain a lot.
Gawd give me strength... |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
52/48 is not 50/50. I know you're a remoaner with a lack of understanding of maths, but I'll just help you out. It's a clear 4 point lead for the leavers.
Maths eh? Even if it was 4 percent, that simply isn't a credible basis for enacting considerable change. Especially given how many of the voters on the "winning" side were clearly duped by utter bullshit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 19,783
|
Quote:
It's actually only approximately two percent - if you're not one option, you're the other. Only about 600k people would have to move to remain in order for it to "win".
Maths eh? Even if it was 4 percent, that simply isn't a credible basis for enacting considerable change. Especially given how many of the voters on the "winning" side were clearly duped by utter bullshit. Nope. Basic logic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,278
|
Quote:
52/48 is not 50/50. I know you're a remoaner with a lack of understanding of maths, but I'll just help you out. It's a clear 4 point lead for the leavers.
Quote:
It's err 4%. So I was right. Your maths is crap. And I hate to break it to you, it's a majority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 19,783
|
Quote:
Yep, definitely one of the swivel-eyed-loon brigade. And therefore irrelevant...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Yep, definitely one of the swivel-eyed-loon brigade. And therefore irrelevant...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,814
|
Quote:
It's actually only approximately two percent - if you're not one option, you're the other. Only about 600k people would have to move to remain in order for it to "win".
Maths eh? Even if it was 4 percent, that simply isn't a credible basis for enacting considerable change. Especially given how many of the voters on the "winning" side were clearly duped by utter bullshit. Nope. Basic logic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,224
|
Quote:
but what would that ' Brexit party' deliver ?
Carswell's version of Brexit (allow very high levels of immigration to preserve the economy, model the UK on Singapore or Dubai) or Farage's (cut immigration at any economic cost) or someone else's ? As I said : the Brexit project might well fail due to the fragmented support it has. May will do the only thing possible politically. She will salvage as much economic free access as she can , satisfy as many Leave voters as possible, and hope she doesn't get the blame, for the results of leaving ,on spending and the economy. The Leave vote will remain, and remain divided. The racists will be racists. The constitutionalists will either be happy, or not, with the degree of separation. The free trade enthusiasts will remain deluded, and blame others when we remain uncompetitive. And the people who assumed we would be better off, will have to decide who to blame - themselves, Leave leaders, or the government, for being poorer, |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:13.


