DS Forums

 
 

Electoral fraud: Voters will have to show ID in pilot scheme


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-12-2016, 11:16
cheesy_pasty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 4,048
There's electoral fraud in all of Bradford and Birmingham?
I can't say for Birmingham, but electoral fraud in Bradford at least I thought was quite widely known of.

Family and community "leaders" often vote on behalf of the entire family/community through the use of postal votes.
cheesy_pasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-12-2016, 11:23
platelet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GL51 0EX
Posts: 14,093
I propose two options which should satisfy both those that find postal voting mortally repugnant, and those that fear disenfranchising those without ID:

1) You should be required to turn up in person at whatever polling station you used for your very first vote regardless of where you live now (donkey optional). You must bring along both parents (or their death certificates) and a recognised professional of good standing in their community who can vouch for you. A DNA sample and your fingerprints or retina scan can then be taken if you wish to use the fast track queue for future votes

2) Your vote is rolled into the "real-time" online accounts as HMRC introduce them. This would have the added bonus of you being able to change your preference at any time you like.

☑️ the I'd like to vote for a Tory box when setting up your account and that's what will be used for every election going forward till HMRC record you as dead or you go in and ☑️ the I'd like to vote for a UKIP

As an additional revenue raiser HMRC can then move into the "opinion poll" market - finally bringing a level of credebility back to the polls
platelet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 11:49
crystallad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,512
How is discouraging people from voting protecting our democracy?
By stopping fraudulent votes, by definition is not democracy
crystallad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 11:52
crystallad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,512
But only in selected areas such as Bradford and Birmingham and where electoral fraud happens.
But we have to roll it around the rest of the country other wise it will be deemed racist. Hilarious , it's gone around full circle. Do the liberals want democracy or pick on the minority areas or have positive discrimination or their favourite turn a blind eye?
crystallad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 11:54
tghe-retford
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Retford
Posts: 20,450
So you just made up that NHS number would be accepted, and in some pilot areas utility bills might not be accepted if they require photo ID.
I'll wager now that eventually the only forms of ID accepted will be a passport or a full driving licence. That's a full driving licence, not a provisional one.

And if pensioners don't have either, I would not be surprised if passports are subsidised or given free to that demographic with others paying for it as we do now for TV Licences for the over 75's.

Removing those who vote from the lower paid and welfare dependent demographics under pension age is of benefit to the Tories and can easily be spun as "removing voter fraud" because who is going to be for fraud?
tghe-retford is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 11:56
MARTYM8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,289
Are they scrapping postal votes in this scheme because that's where there's the obvious opportunity to commit electoral fraud?
They won't scrap postal votes - the Tories and Labour have them mastered to a tee. Many recent by elections have effectively been won before polling day due to postal votes.

What was wrong with the old system - unless you are housebound or can prove you are away on holiday or business you must vote in person. People died for the right to vote - the least people can do is get off their backsides and walk or drive 5 minutes to their polling station to vote by secure secret ballot.

Cos if you are that lazy frankly you don't deserve the vote that many in the rest of the world would love to have.
MARTYM8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 11:57
Thor_Noggsson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 349
Electoral fraud is a growing problem that needs to be tackled. Requiring people to show ID is a necessary step and one I have long championed.

If requiring people to prove they are who they claim to be discourages some people from voting then tough luck. At least we'll have more confidence the actual votes cast were genuine and not fraudulently obtained.
My son and his wife were given two votes each in the referendum in two different constituancies.
Had ID been required it wouldn't have been a problem.
Besides it was the system that screwed up
Thor_Noggsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:04
RRL
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 980
My son and his wife were given two votes each in the referendum in two different constituancies.
Had ID been required it wouldn't have been a problem.
Besides it was the system that screwed up
And why was that?

Where they students?

Had they moved recently. or some other reason?
RRL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:06
Video Nasty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 216
Still waiting for evidence from "the defenders of democracy" of all this voter fraud at the polling booth.

The majority of voter fraud accusations are usually linked to postal votes.
Anyone?
Video Nasty is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:06
Mark_Jones9
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6,835
By stopping fraudulent votes, by definition is not democracy
How many proven fraudulent votes were there in the 2015 general election?
If there is a official government estimate for the number of fraudulent votes in the 2015 general election what is it?
Did fraud effect the outcome of the general election?

The government "anti-fraud" measure of individual voter registration has resulted in about 800,000 people being disenfranchised.
Is there a official government estimate of how many people will not vote if voter ID at polling stations is introduced and if photo ID is required?

Going by media reports and police investigations the most widespread problem in the 2015 general election was the Conservative party accidentally breaking constituency campaign funding limits in marginal constituencies, and accidentally omitting stuff in its campaign accounts. Should the rules and punishment for that not be enhanced to prevent further accidents.
Mark_Jones9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:07
Thor_Noggsson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 349
And why was that?

Where they students?

Had they moved recently. or some other reason?
They had moved recently and the system hadn't caught up.
Thor_Noggsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:12
MARTYM8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,289
And why was that?

Where they students?

Had they moved recently. or some other reason?
If you live in two places you can be registered in both - and can vote in local elections in both. But you can't vote twice in general elections or referendums. People could easily have voted twice in June and it not be picked up.

Postal votes are the biggest potential area of fraud because of the risk of voters being pressured to vote a certain way as its not a secret ballot.
MARTYM8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:17
crystallad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,512
How many proven fraudulent votes were there in the 2015 general election?
If there is a official government estimate for the number of fraudulent votes in the 2015 general election what is it?
Did fraud effect the outcome of the general election?

The government "anti-fraud" measure of individual voter registration has resulted in about 800,000 people being disenfranchised.
Is there a official government estimate of how many people will not vote if voter ID at polling stations is introduced and if photo ID is required?

Going by media reports and police investigations the most widespread problem in the 2015 general election was the Conservative party accidentally breaking constituency campaign funding limits in marginal constituencies, and accidentally omitting stuff in its campaign accounts. Should the rules and punishment for that not be enhanced to prevent further accidents.
Maybe you should ask the ex mayor of Tower hamlets if he knows how many!
crystallad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:27
jmclaugh
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 47,995
Can't say I see a problem with this. As for postal votes if they don't already perhaps they should introduce identity checks for those registering like they do if you wish to access certain government websites such as to get a forecast for your state pension.
jmclaugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:33
MARTYM8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,289
Can't say I see a problem with this. As for postal votes if they don't already perhaps they should introduce identity checks for those registering like they do if you wish to access certain government websites such as to get a forecast for your state pension.
It not getting the postal votes that is the issue.

It's how they are cast that is the issue - no secret ballot and people (often women in some minority communities) pressured to vote a certain way.

The most sacred part of voting is that it is supposed to be a secret process and you cast your vote in private and no one else can see how you voted - so you cannot be bullied into voting a certain way. Postal voting has destroyed that and should be stopped except for those who truly cannot make it to the polling station early.

Maybe instead you could have early voting as in the US at the town hall and say libraries elsewhere and postal voting only for the frail elderly and those who can prove they are on holiday or away on work. Otherwise you vote in person on the day by secret ballot.
MARTYM8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:51
InMyArms
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 39,227
Maybe instead you could have early voting as in the US at the town hall and say libraries elsewhere and postal voting only for the frail elderly and those who can prove they are on holiday or away on work. Otherwise you vote in person on the day by secret ballot.
I think they should do this too, though it should extend to disabled younger people too and not just the elderly.

Until the recent US election I would have favoured electronic voting too, but I think our traditional approach is more secure.
InMyArms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 12:55
Dotheboyshall
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,313
Maybe you should ask the ex mayor of Tower hamlets if he knows how many!
Or the ex mayor of Bradford who produced the report.
Dotheboyshall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 13:14
Dotheboyshall
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,313
I can't say for Birmingham, but electoral fraud in Bradford at least I thought was quite widely known of.

Family and community "leaders" often vote on behalf of the entire family/community through the use of postal votes.
Bradford covers a large area most of which doesn't have 'community' leaders, and precisely how is this measure supposed to stop postal fraud.
Dotheboyshall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 13:15
Dotheboyshall
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,313
By stopping fraudulent votes, by definition is not democracy
Discouraging legitimate voters from voting is democracy? Perhaps in a third world state like North Carolina it is, elsewhere not so.
Dotheboyshall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 13:23
MARTYM8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,289
Discouraging legitimate voters from voting is democracy? Perhaps in a third world state like North Carolina it is, elsewhere not so.
The way to ensure a fair vote is to ensure as many votes as possible are by secret ballot - bar those like the disabled and elderly who are housebound. By definition postal votes cannot be certain to be cast by secret ballot - those in polling stations are.

Particularly in local elections in small wards dominated by one community it could be very easy for people - particularly women - to be forced or encouraged into voting a certain way or even have someone complete their ballot paper for them.

That is why postal voting needs to be curtailed as it is open to voter manipulation, suppression and oppression - presumably the sort of things you don't approve of in NC.

Only truly secret ballots guarantee a fair vote.
MARTYM8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 14:52
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
I propose two options which should satisfy both those that find postal voting mortally repugnant, and those that fear disenfranchising those without ID:

1) You should be required to turn up in person at whatever polling station you used for your very first vote regardless of where you live now (donkey optional). You must bring along both parents (or their death certificates) and a recognised professional of good standing in their community who can vouch for you. A DNA sample and your fingerprints or retina scan can then be taken if you wish to use the fast track queue for future votes

2) Your vote is rolled into the "real-time" online accounts as HMRC introduce them. This would have the added bonus of you being able to change your preference at any time you like.

☑️ the I'd like to vote for a Tory box when setting up your account and that's what will be used for every election going forward till HMRC record you as dead or you go in and ☑️ the I'd like to vote for a UKIP

As an additional revenue raiser HMRC can then move into the "opinion poll" market - finally bringing a level of credebility back to the polls
Your cunning plan part 2 may fail at the problem, that to register for an online HMRC account, you need the same photo ID you didn't have to vote.

That fails for the same reason idea 1 fails - the government won't pay for a proper ID for everyone . let alone something that costs money. They just end up putting forward worse and worse ideas to get around their own failure to provide one.
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 14:59
scott789s
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,017
Hang on…..is that an Elephant I can see in the room.
scott789s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 15:09
RRL
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 980
As voter identification works perfectly well in Northern Ireland I can't see what the problem is here unless of course the naysayers are saying the rest of the UK are snowflakes and couldn't possibly quote

Forms of identification acceptable in NI

A UK, Irish or EEA driving licence (photographic part) (provisional accepted)
A UK, Irish or EU passport (note: EU passports are not accepted at UK Parliamentary elections)
An Electoral Identity Card (issued free of charge)
A Translink Senior SmartPass
A Translink 60+ SmartPass
A Translink War Disabled SmartPass
A Translink Blind Person’s SmartPass

http://www.eoni.org.uk/Electoral-Ide...tity-Card-FAQs
RRL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 15:16
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
There is none. its a non issue. Where it might exist in some communities in small numbers, the seats tend to be safe anyway. In those communities the pressures to vote one way will continue to be applied .

The real impact will be to disenfranchise people who don't yet, or no longer have a car, those who don't , or cant, travel overseas, and wives and children who don't have thei names on ultility bills or bank accounts. The geriatrics will have postal votes anyway , so it will mainly hit the young, and poor.
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 15:21
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
As voter identification works perfectly well in Northern Ireland I can't see what the problem is here unless of course the naysayers are saying the rest of the UK are snowflakes and couldn't possibly quote

Forms of identification acceptable in NI

A UK, Irish or EEA driving licence (photographic part) (provisional accepted)
A UK, Irish or EU passport (note: EU passports are not accepted at UK Parliamentary elections)
An Electoral Identity Card (issued free of charge)
A Translink Senior SmartPass
A Translink 60+ SmartPass
A Translink War Disabled SmartPass
A Translink Blind Person’s SmartPass

http://www.eoni.org.uk/Electoral-Ide...tity-Card-FAQs
The obvious difference is that they have already issued an ID card to vote with if you don't have anything else. And the UK doesn't have a translink equivalent - bus passes now match the retirement age so some people won't get one till they are 70
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:22.