DS Forums

 
 

Should focus be on audience appreciation, rather than ratings?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-12-2016, 12:39
Paul_Culloty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 477

Despite being a commercial concern, Netflix famously refuse to release viewership figures for their series on the grounds that their revenue is directed towards producing programmes of quality, rather than churning out quantities of dross. Perhaps UK media attention should be similarly focused less on the daily ratings war, but on Audience Appreciation Index scores, and how series contribute to a channel's brand identity. For instance, BBC Four's historical documentaries and musical programmes may never rate particularly highly, but mesh well in terms of the channel's "arts and culture" niche, whereas BBC Two seems to have become an ill-defined Corporation dumping-ground, and likewise Film4 has a clearly-defined purpose, whereas its parent channel's alternative edge seems to have been blunted since the turn of the millennium. Of course, commercial channels may have more need for ratings as a yardstick towards profitability, but even here, appreciation scores might be a significant help towards ensuring the demographic mix is well-balanced.
Paul_Culloty is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-12-2016, 12:55
mike65
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Waterford Ireland
Posts: 8,844
I think there is much to be said for measuring enjoyment first and actual eyeballs second.
I imagine there are data sets for appreciation out there somewhere. I'd guess BBC Four would probably have the highest rating of the "low number" channels.
mike65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 13:05
Paul_Culloty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 477
I think there is much to be said for measuring enjoyment first and actual eyeballs second.
I imagine there are data sets for appreciation out there somewhere. I'd guess BBC Four would probably have the highest rating of the "low number" channels.
It seems BARB conducted the AI until 2002, and BBC have conducted it for all channels since. Surprising it isn't more publicised, they could publish weekly data for the leading channels.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appreciation_Index
Paul_Culloty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 17:05
lundavra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,465
I don't believe Netfix's reason though, they are a business so only interested in numbers. If they carry adverts then it will be bums on seats, otherwise the number of new customers that will matter.
lundavra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 17:12
Baz_James
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Honiton, Devon
Posts: 1,935
Despite being a commercial concern, Netflix famously refuse to release viewership figures for their series on the grounds that their revenue is directed towards producing programmes of quality, rather than churning out quantities of dross.
And if you believe that you'll be watching Netflix on the moon by the end of next year! They don't release viewing figures because it would scare their accountants to death and the stock prices would plummet. Netflix is vastly over-committed and desperate for subscribers. They can't afford to be picky about what drags people through the door!
Baz_James is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 18:30
petely
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,962
Perhaps UK media attention should be similarly focused less on the daily ratings war, but on Audience Appreciation Index scores.
The BBC will always come out on top, simply because they don't have advertising breaks. Their programmes would have to be much, much, worse (right down to Channel 5 quality) than now before people would be prepared to put up with long breaks during their programmes and start watching the commercial channels in any significant numbers ON A REGULAR BASIS.

(that last phrase was put there for all the people who will now chime in and say "there was a programme on ITV in April 1997 that got more viewers than BBC1 did" - as if single examples disprove a wider point.
petely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2016, 19:24
lundavra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,465
The BBC will always come out on top, simply because they don't have advertising breaks. Their programmes would have to be much, much, worse (right down to Channel 5 quality) than now before people would be prepared to put up with long breaks during their programmes and start watching the commercial channels in any significant numbers ON A REGULAR BASIS.

(that last phrase was put there for all the people who will now chime in and say "there was a programme on ITV in April 1997 that got more viewers than BBC1 did" - as if single examples disprove a wider point.
There are also enough arguments about accuracy or validity of viewing figures which are relatively easy to measure but I can't imagine anyone believing anyone else's audience appreciation figures.

The 'talent' might not like to read that 90% of people don't like them.
lundavra is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00.