|
||||||||
George Michael - Disrespect |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 4,950
|
Quote:
It's sad that he can't have a private meal in a restaurant without being papped... obviously oblivious to the camera in that last photo published in the tabloids...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,741
|
Quote:
In the main the Guardian was better but The Guardian had a dreadful article by Owen Jones who seems to think that George's greatest characteristic was his homosexuality.
George was an immensely talented man, who happened to be homosexual. It will be really refreshing the day that The Guardian value and praise people for their talents rather than their ability to belong to a minority group that one of their journalists can turn into a "victim" article. For all George Michael's flaws it's more respectful to see him as a warts and all individual who will be remembered for who he was, not reduced to him just being a label. Like you say George being gay was just one aspect out of everything which made up his identity as an individual. How embarrassing it would be to be remembered for being good at being gay. That would diminish somebody as a person in their own right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,009
|
Quote:
Things haven't improved in this respect since Marilyn Monroe's death in the 1960s:
"All the papers had to say was that Marilyn was found in the nude" [Candle in the Wind] These amazing people who entertain us all - how the press love to hound them, even after death. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,431
|
Quote:
The only disrespect going on here is GM's disrespect to his own body. I thought the article was pretty neutral actually. They simply reported the facts - including the good stuff like his generosity - so good on them (for a change).
As for him being an 'icon' he is no icon of mine thank you very much. So he was a great artist. It doesn't qualify him as a saint and his lifestyle certainly doesn't. People these days seem to have lost all perspective. Just because someone dies doesn't mean you should airbrush their problems and make them out to be something they weren't. And maybe his early death will make others take stock - should it be found to have been linked to his lifestyle. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
Oh look, you said the magic words.... Now i know to discount anything else you have to say on the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Echo Beach
Posts: 529
|
Its the Daily Mail what do people expect?
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:41.




