Originally Posted by Lisa_Naylor:
“ITV's schedule was so bad it should have been shot. They didn't put any effort into things and they should be ashamed of what they put on.”
Imagine this:
You have a stall at a christmas market and you're selling sausages in rolls for £1 each. You do pretty well, and the burger-joint next to you sells different stuff for people who don't want a sausage.
Then, the people who get all the entrance money from the fair - paid by all the customers who come in - decide to get in on the act and open stalls for sausages, burgers, pies, icecream and GIVE IT AWAY FOR FREE.
How could you compete with that? Should you "be shot" for not putting any effort into something that is clearly dominated by the other lot, and with whom it's impossible to compete?
Wouldn't it be better if there was no entrance fee, but all the stalls could sell a variety of stuff, at a variety of prices. Then each could make some money, innovation would increase the range of products available, competition would improve the quality and if people didn't want to buy as much as they had previously paid to get in, they wouldn't have to.