|
||||||||
Home Office says EU citizen has no right to stay in UK |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 97,113
|
Quote:
Not if you read the story. In her complaint, Hawkins points out that she included a solicitor-approved photocopy of her passport – which is permissible under the rules – plus a covering letter to explain why she could not be without her passport for the four to six months it takes to process.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
I'd like to think a PR card should be required from eligible EU migrants when applying for UK citizenship, which will make it in line with immigration rules that apply to all non-EU migrants in the long run. The fact that EU migrants can save 1810 in cost is already a huge advantage on its own merit.
However, an EU citizen who is a housewife or house husband and married to a UK citizen is currently unable to apply for a PR card (not exercising treaty rights) and therefore unable to apply for citizenship. This is in breach of domestic immigration legislation and in breach of EU legislation and has to be dealt with. As I said - there are several court cases on-going. The requirement of holding a PR card (which by the way doesn't even state the date on which PR was acquired) as a prerequisite to citizenship was a typical May/HO decision without any thought behind it. It does not work. HO office staff without adequate training make the situation worse... I've had to deal with them a few weeks ago on behalf of a client where they insisted that the PR card must be held for a year prior to being eligible for citizenship. This is not true and is stated in the internal guidance notes - the requirement is for permanent residence to have been held for 5 years + 1 year to be eligible for citizenship. In the case I dealt with the person arrived in the UK in 2005, exercised treaty rights since then and therefore became a permanent resident in 2010. She applied for her PR card in January this year having submitted evidence for the period of 2005 to 2010 and the recorded date for PR in the HO database was 2010.... yet the administrator assessing her citizenship application refused it as she had not held the card for a year. Suffice to say the case was quickly given to a different case worker and she now is a citizen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,437
|
Quote:
We either have immigration rules or we don't. She's been her for long enough to have sorted the matter out long before now. She is at fault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,863
|
It seems to me that this whole issue can be easily solved by this lady going to the Dutch embassy and obtaining Dutch ID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 34
|
Small point of order: you are not required to possess a Dutch ID card; you must be able to identify yourself if requested but a passport can also be used to do this.
Why would she need a Dutch ID card anyway if she is resident in the UK and has a (Dutch) passport? |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 25,218
|
Quote:
We either have immigration rules or we don't. She's been her for long enough to have sorted the matter out long before now. She is at fault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
Small point of order: you are not required to possess a Dutch ID card; you must be able to identify yourself if requested but a passport can also be used to do this.
Why would she need a Dutch ID card anyway if she is resident in the UK and has a (Dutch) passport? |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
Also she said she had to send her passport away but the application will accept an ID Card so why didn't she send her Dutch ID card or if she drives her Driving Licence.
Whilst the bog standard computerised response she got may have been a shock the situation is basically of her making by her errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
It doesn't work. If you have lived here for 5 years and have been exercising treaty rights then yes, fair enough... you get your PR card and then apply for citizenship.
However, an EU citizen who is a housewife or house husband and married to a UK citizen is currently unable to apply for a PR card (not exercising treaty rights) and therefore unable to apply for citizenship. This is in breach of domestic immigration legislation and in breach of EU legislation and has to be dealt with. As I said - there are several court cases on-going. The requirement of holding a PR card (which by the way doesn't even state the date on which PR was acquired) as a prerequisite to citizenship was a typical May/HO decision without any thought behind it. It does not work. HO office staff without adequate training make the situation worse... I've had to deal with them a few weeks ago on behalf of a client where they insisted that the PR card must be held for a year prior to being eligible for citizenship. This is not true and is stated in the internal guidance notes - the requirement is for permanent residence to have been held for 5 years + 1 year to be eligible for citizenship. In the case I dealt with the person arrived in the UK in 2005, exercised treaty rights since then and therefore became a permanent resident in 2010. She applied for her PR card in January this year having submitted evidence for the period of 2005 to 2010 and the recorded date for PR in the HO database was 2010.... yet the administrator assessing her citizenship application refused it as she had not held the card for a year. Suffice to say the case was quickly given to a different case worker and she now is a citizen. By marrying a British citizen or some settled person, the given EU migrant should have the two options for qualifying a PR card, either 5 years residence on his/her own merit, or the family route, whichever is sooner. As to UK citizenship, ILR gained through marriage will exempt the applicant from waiting another year, meaning after 5 years continuous residence and a continuous relationship, as soon as the ILR granted, the applicant can start applying for UK citizenship. The above logic in theory can surely be adopted in the rules for EU migrants if they have not already (just replace ILR with PR). If there are some missing clauses, the rules should be amended sooner or later. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
She goes back to Holland on visits so she would need her ID as a Dutch Citizen, any EU person I know who lives here renews their ID card at their embassy in the UK .
However lets say she did not have an ID card she could use the European Passport Return Service run by local councils as stated on the government websites , if she is in London each borough does it. Within 5 days of doing your form you go to the council/borough offices and pay £15 they certify a copy of your passport (not a solicitor) and then they send all your documents/application etc including the certified copy for you and you keep hold of your passport. As I said before yes she is shocked at the response generated by computer but it is a catalogue of errors and misunderstandings on her part Just a couple of examples but they are all the same other than opening hours https://www.hants.gov.uk/registratio...treturnservice https://www.islington.gov.uk/birth-d...return-service |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
In the case of family/marriage route, then EU migrants can follow the non-EU example as well, meaning continuous residence of 5 years become eligible for PR.
As to UK citizenship, ILR gained through marriage will exempt the applicant from waiting another year, meaning after 5 years continuous residence and a continuous relationship, as soon as the ILR granted, the applicant can start applying for UK citizenship. The above logic in theory can surely be adopted in the rules for EU migrants if they have not already (just replace ILR with PR). If there are some missing clauses, the rules can be amended. Also, ILR given because of marriage/civil partnership does not require 5 years of residence but only 3 years (just as a side note). |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
Not really a non story. This will be the reality for many EU migrants here soon enough, judging by the way things are going.
Somehow, I imagined that here having two British kids by a British husband might somehow make her less of a migrant. It seems not. EDIT: You'll be glad to know I am in the same boat as her, so I'll be getting one of those letters one day. If you do get one of those letters, which I very much doubt, it will be because of some documentation error but you seem intelligent enough not to get in that situation. Now I am off to find more on-stories about immigration cock-ups of their own making
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
I'm not arguing that rules can't be amended but as it stands the ILR route is not possible for any EU citizen. In fact it is against the law to apply ILR rules to EU citizens.
Also, ILR given because of marriage/civil partnership does not require 5 years of residence but only 3 years (just as a side note). In the long run, rules for non-eu and EU migrants should be brought in line, possibly with some exceptions in regards to skill shortage, salary and financial requirement for EEA route, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
3 years rule is the old one where marrying for 2 years guarantees an ILR plus extra year in the country either before the spouse visa or after ILR. Rules for family route have been tightened up a lot by the conservative government in 2012. It is now a standard 2.5+2.5=5 years before the ILR via family route.
In the long run, rules for non-eu and EU migrants should be brought in line, possibly with some exceptions in regards to skill shortage, salary and financial requirement for EEA route, etc. Regardless, you're missing the point and saying in the long run non-EU and EU requirements should be brought in line is not solving the problem right now. As it stands, the EU spouse of a UK citizen is unable to become a permanent resident and British Citizen if they're not exercising treaty rights. So any stay-at-home mum who is not on maternity leave is affected, and so are a lot of other people. British Citizenship requires a PR card, a PR card requires 5 years of exercising treaty rights. There is no other route for EU citizens. So right now, your Polish plumber who apparently undercuts local plumbers and takes their work away is able to take British Citizenship whereas your neighbour's French wife who has lived here since 1999 and has brought up 3 children has no right to become British whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,176
|
Quote:
What have the children got to do with her right to stay? Either she has a right or she hasn't.
Imo, she has the right to stay as an EU worker though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,176
|
Quote:
The Guardian has not bothered to really check the procedure have they , if you are an EU citizen you do not need normally need to apply for residency as after 5 years you automatically have Permanent Residency Status
A client of mine had no end of trouble proving 5 years employment because her NI records didn't show NI contributions for the full 5 years. The HO wouldn't accept that that was because her earnings were below the NI threshold, even when she submitted payslips showing that that was the case. She couldn't get supporting evidence from the employer, as the business had been taken over and the new owner didn't have any records of former staff. She then managed to track down the former owner, who wrote confirming her employment, but they wouldn't accept that. In the end, it all took so long that she'd worked 6.5 years, and they then granted it, but I think she had to do something like formally withdraw her initial application and start again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,224
|
Quote:
It was her passport she did not supply and a validated copy should have been adequate.
When she says “I do not believe there is any other business, organisation or even legal process in the world that would treat its customers/clients/applicants in this manner.” It is a sentiment I can perfectly understand having dealt with them. And thats going to get far worse - with 3 times as many applications for this documentation as before already, and potentially 4 million, not 70k people in the queue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
You're mixing up things - I said 3 years residence, not living here under Leave to Remain (i.e. 3 years of holding Indefinite Leave to Remain - you're not considered resident whilst on Leave to Remain).
Regardless, you're missing the point and saying in the long run non-EU and EU requirements should be brought in line is not solving the problem right now. As it stands, the EU spouse of a UK citizen is unable to become a permanent resident and British Citizen if they're not exercising treaty rights. So any stay-at-home mum who is not on maternity leave is affected, and so are a lot of other people. British Citizenship requires a PR card, a PR card requires 5 years of exercising treaty rights. There is no other route for EU citizens. So right now, your Polish plumber who apparently undercuts local plumbers and takes their work away is able to take British Citizenship whereas your neighbour's French wife who has lived here since 1999 and has brought up 3 children has no right to become British whatsoever. Even right now, citizenship applications from non-eu tier 1 and 2 migrants only require 1 year after ILR, for which they need to work continuously for 5 years under limited leave to remain. Migrants holding valid visa and can live in the UK for longer than 6 months per year are still considered residents, but not permanent residents for sure. There's also a concept of ordinary residence which may be even more confusing to many. https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...yresidence.pdf I'd like to believe home office will amend the rules in due course to make clear what evidence would be required from EU migrants who didnt work and pay tax in the previous 5 years. Some transitional agreement will be published once we are clear on who and on what conditions would qualify for PR after negotiations. But I have no doubt in the long run that rules for EU migrants will likely be brought in line with rules for non-EU migrants. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
The old 3 years rule I was referring to was for UK citizenship application from applicants who have received ILR under marriage route. The spouse visa is a form of limited leave to remain and only one year out of the immigration control, i.e. after ILR granted, would be suffice.
Even right now, citizenship applications from non-eu tier 1 and 2 migrants only require 1 year after ILR, for which they need to work continuously for 5 years under limited leave to remain. Migrants holding valid visa and can live in the UK for longer than 6 months per year are still considered residents, but not permanent residents for sure. There's also a concept of ordinary residence which may be even more confusing to many. https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...yresidence.pdf I'd like to believe home office will amend the rules in due course to make clear what evidence would be required from EU migrants who didnt work and pay tax in the previous 5 years. Some transitional agreement will be published once we are clear on who and on what conditions would qualify for PR after negotiations. But I have no doubt in the long run that rules for EU migrants will likely be brought in line with rules for non-EU migrants. That's all fine but the HO/May didn't change the rule regarding the requirement of possessing a PR card because of Brexit. This was changed in the middle of 2015 for no apparent reason and without thought. As I said, several court cases ongoing. It is outrageous that a non-EU citizen in this country can become British without hassle because they're married to an EU citizen but an EU citizen married to an UK citizen cannot.... it's discrimination of our own citizens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 24,735
|
Quote:
It is outrageous that a non-EU citizen in this country can become British without hassle because they're married to an EU citizen but an EU citizen married to an UK citizen cannot.... it's discrimination of our own citizens.
Assuming that the HO give my wife a visa when she applies back home (she has to take an English test and TB Test) it will be 5 years before she can apply for ILR (not be granted it automatically) |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,660
|
Quote:
Not that simple - a non-EU citizen married to a British citizen has a harder time than a non-EU citizen married to an EU (Non British Citizen) with the former having to wait 4 times as long as the latter - it was in the last but one refusal I got for Mrs C. This is why I cannot understand the HO refusal - this lady has been living in the country for 20 years and should have automatic ILR - even if she was not an EU Citizen.
Assuming that the HO give my wife a visa when she applies back home (she has to take an English test and TB Test) it will be 5 years before she can apply for ILR (not be granted it automatically) 1. Non-EU citizen married to EU citizen resident in the UK 2. Non-EU citizen married to UK citizen who has exercised treaty rights in another EU state (Surinder Singh case law) 3. Non-EU citizen married to UK citizen resident in the UK 4 (currently impossible) - EU citizen married to UK citizen resident in the UK This obviously does not take into consideration becoming British as a single person, either from the EU or non-EU which is an entirely different kettle of fish. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,236
|
Quote:
It is a non story quite frankly. This sort of thing has been happening for donkey's years if you don't provide the right documentation it is inevitable. It is best she provides the right documentation and fills the forms in correctly.
If you do get one of those letters, which I very much doubt, it will be because of some documentation error but you seem intelligent enough not to get in that situation. Now I am off to find more on-stories about immigration cock-ups of their own making ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
That's exactly what I'm saying - in order of how easy it is to become British:
1. Non-EU citizen married to EU citizen resident in the UK 2. Non-EU citizen married to UK citizen who has exercised treaty rights in another EU state (Surinder Singh case law) 3. Non-EU citizen married to UK citizen resident in the UK 4 (currently impossible) - EU citizen married to UK citizen resident in the UK This obviously does not take into consideration becoming British as a single person, either from the EU or non-EU which is an entirely different kettle of fish. 1. No need to meet the financial requirements, 18600 annual income or 62500 in savings if neither is in work. 2. No need to pay for hefty fees for immigration applications Including the £1875 for permanent residence card that non-eu migrants have to cough up. 3. No need to pay for NHS surcharge, 200 quid per year for 5 years. British citizens are indeed being treated as second class in their own country. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wammy's House
Posts: 4,784
|
So this case is not a one off. The issue was known about yet left to continue. Interesting. It's almost as if they want to scare people in to leaving.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...onique-hawkins [ISam Schwarzkopf, a German neuroscientist living in the UK, contacted the Guardian after it published the story of Monique Hawkins. He said he had a similar experience at the hands of the Home Office to Hawkins, a Dutch woman who was told to make preparations to leave the UK after she applied for British citizenship following the EU referendum. This was despite her living in the UK for 24 years and having two children with her British husband. Schwarzkopf said: “I am a German citizen who moved to the UK in 1999 to study neuroscience at Cardiff University, both my undergraduate degree and my PhD. After I got my PhD in 2007, I decided to remain in the UK to work. I am now married to a British woman and am a faculty member at University College London. “I originally applied for that permanent residence document in March 2016 because it is necessary for a British citizenship application. “In June, one week before the referendum, my application was rejected. The reason was that I hadn’t included my passport in the application, only a legally certified colour copy. This rejection letter contained the phrase that I ‘should now make preparations to leave’ the UK. ][/i] |
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 676
|
It is really sad. I know a lady from Finland who came here as a model, later founded her own business, married an award-winning documentary maker and they had a son in Scotland where they eventually settled.
She is a great contribution to our society, but will she be getting one of these letters? Will she be asked to leave despite owning a small business and having a British husband and son? While foreign men with dubious backgrounds and no intention to integrate illegally sneak into the country on trucks? The whole situation is wrong. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:13.




