If its what a person needs, and their certain..... Then soon is better. The longer you leave it, the lest convincing you looks

Im pretty sure 3 or 4 yo is way to young. Please do not reply trying to convince me other wise. That is just wrong!

No one is advocating surgery on 3 of 4 year olds. But they should be allowed to play, and dress as they feel comfortable....

We are not talking about play and dressing.. All my grandchildren dress how they please. They also have any toy they want gender does not come into what we buy them.

Nobody is advocating sex realignment surgey on four year olds......

But they are starting the procedure on children as young as 3 and 4 years old. That is just wrong and as damaging as not helping a older child who needs help understanding their gender.

All are hogwash/annoying, with the exception of putting my socks in a washing machine and losing one.

That one I'm on the fence about.

How do you know this is "not possible"? Why do you assume major injuries require massive bloodstains covering, or even touching any visible portion of the truck? Wouldn't the injuries occur when the truck ran over them (sorry for the graphic thoughts), or were hit by another structure knocked by the truck?

200 people not leaving any trace on the truck?. No sorry not buying that at all. one or two maybe. But seeing many road accidents then sorry not possible for 200 or even 10/20 people not leaving a trace.

Think about what you said. Unless they were all lying in the road waiting, then the truck knocked them over, then would run over those not flung elsewhere.

Good to see all the contemptible conspiracy theorists we were talking about crawling out from under their rocks.

Tell us about the crisis actors you've spotted from other false flag operations. We can't wait.

You tell me how a white truck comes out clean after killing and maiming over 200 people.

That to me was a puzzle .. a huge elephant in the room. You can call me all the names you like but that question remains unanswered and even unquestioned by the majority

Your inability to imagine reality is not my problem.

That's because socks are made up of unstable sartorial particles known as sockerons. If constrained in a rotating frame of reference, the sockerons undergo spontaneous decay and the sock transform into a handkerchief and a bit of fluff.

Funny enough as a retired paramedic I believe my reality to be the real reality of what a white truck would have really looked like.

Go and think about it. go do some research into traffic accidents. Don't just be flippant about it all. All you are doing is trying to police other people, shutting them up by trying to insult them. You are the one not facing reality.

So the usual, then: no evidence, just personal incredulity. Gotcha.

Really?

Having researched and attended many RTC's, I'm not at all surprised, in fact I can't recall a single Vehicle Vs person RTC where there was blood on the front of the vehicle. The may have been some internal injuries from the initial impact, but people were pushed over and then injured and killed when they were run over by the wheels. Also, I believe the truck hit some stalls/debris and pushed those along in front of it, which actually hit people.

Quite. I wonder if there are crisis actor deer too? They seem to regularly get hit by vehicles travelling much faster than the Nice truck, and often "die" without leaving blood on the vehicle that hit them.

They do all look a bit similar, now I think about it...

As usual with conspiracy loonery, the CT's like to postulate an extraordinarily elaborate conspiracy, let down by some trivial oversight.

A conspiracy theory becomes really annoying when it simultaneously embraces the notions that "they" have the ability and resources to plan and execute such an elaborate plot... but are also so stupid that it's riddled with schoolboy errors.

Ah yes ... the 'James Bond Baddy' method of planning which involves believing that the more complicated a plan is, the better it is!

I doubt many CT-ers would recognise Risk Analysis if it jumped up and bit them on the jacksie.

But then what do you suggest as an alternative to the official version of the events that were witnessed by so many people? Are you saying the 80+ people didn't die or were killed in a different way?

Why was every poll wrong at predicting that Hillary Clinton would win the Presidency

And in addition did the 100s of eye witnesses and survivors all suffer from mass hallucination?

Depends how you define poll. Some did predict a trump win.
Otherwise, it is a matter of getting a representative sample and college votes.
Not sure what this is to do with CT.

I have never believed Oswald acted alone. On being arrested he said to the police 'can 't you see I'm the patsy?'
That had the ring of truth.

Then Jack Ruby turned up and shot him. How convenient.

One suggestion is that people lie to opinion pollsters. Someone intending to vote for Trump would be embarrassed / ashamed to admit it, and so declare themselves to be undecided, or even a putative Clinton voter.

Or it could be just that trying to ensure that the polling sample is representative of the demographics of the electorate as a whole introduces too many sources of inaccuracy.