Originally Posted by
Trulytrue:
“It does not matter about the errors as no one questions them, and if you do you are a nutty CT who believes in reptile royalty and flat earth.
My only question on the Nice one was the clean truck. and all I get are well you don't always get blood so its possible. Yes I get that its possible for one, two hey even ten people if you like not to have blood but over 200 ?
Witnesses say they see carnage, someone decapitated, disembowelled limbs flying off carnage like a battle field, blood everywhere and yet no blood on the truck Were these witnesses lying, as people here are saying the truck was not going fast so its possible, yet again witnesses saying the truck was doing crazy speeds swerving from side to side so to get more people..
People are so fast to dismiss anything remotely CT that they do not stop and think and see that, yes, it is a little strange, they will instead criticise anyone who dares to question anything making people to scared to speak up for fear of ridicule.
The emperors clothes spring to mind.
Is there nothing about any of the terrorists attacks that make you think (later) "hold on a moment"?”
What exactly is your point?
Are you saying that you're just
surprised that there was no obvious blood on the truck but acknowledge there
was such a terrorist attack in Nice, or are you saying there
wasn't an attack as described
because there was no obvious blood?
Those are two completely different things.
You're pussy-footing around the issue by making statements to the effect that (quote) "it's not possible" and "I'm not buying that" whilst acting all hurt because people are treating you as a typical conspiracy theorist.
You question whether people believe that
some witnesses were lying (and with that number of witnesses you're always going to get those who are mistaken, who misjudge speeds, distances etc., who exaggerate, or who use emotive language such as 'doing crazy speeds') yet you seem to be suggesting that
all the witnesses were lying.
It's typical of many conspiracy theorists to cling on to one point which they use to
suggest that it must have been fake, whilst studiously ignoring all other evidence and desperately avoiding making a
direct claim because they know that the balance of evidence is against them.
So, if you don't want to be seen as a 'nutty CT' the solution is in your hands. Do you believe it happened as described or was it faked?