Originally Posted by
mick r:
“Journalist Richard Gutjahr who was Trained by CNN is the guy who took the lorry video in Nice he also videoed the Munich attack a week later .His daughter Thamina Stoll who lives in the USA was also at Munich and videoed some of the attack .
https://www.journalism.co.uk/video/h.../s400/a658883/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhrU42iInKI”
Sounds a bit like that kid who was at and survived three or so of these 'events' (I'm sure many will remember that).
Originally Posted by GusGus:
“I always thought that Lyndon Johnson and the ultra right were behind the Kennedy assassination, the only way they could gain power. And Robert had to be removed because he knew the truth”
Johnson was involved - he was looking at impeachment as V-P before he was sworn in as President (on the plane as they committed a Federal crime removing JFK's body to Maryland for an autopsy when US law says it
had to have taken place locally).
Originally Posted by henryporter:
“The david icke forum idiots have already declared the Turkey shootings as faked”
Icke's a useful idiot to these people because anything he says is automatically rejected by most folks (even though he does get some things very right). AFAIK most genuine posters on his forum were banned a year or two back by his masonic gatekeeper (the guy who destroyed his internet TV station and then ran off to the States with all the money), so just leaving (mostly) nutjobs who are even more clueless and give him an even worse name, (though I don't say he doesn't deserve it - he doesn't convince me he's really genuine). Job done!
Originally Posted by TerraCanis:
“A conspiracy theory becomes really annoying when it simultaneously embraces the notions that "they" have the ability and resources to plan and execute such an elaborate plot... but are also so stupid that it's riddled with schoolboy errors.”
Is there some universal law/force that says psycopaths (and those working for them) are immune to making mistakes?

Anyway, it seems that some things - 'riddled with schoolboy errors' - are accepted by some anyway - 'oh it can't be a conspiracy because they made obvious mistakes' - WTF?
Originally Posted by owen10:
“Why was every poll wrong at predicting that Hillary Clinton would win the Presidency”
Every pollster I followed (not the usual suspects naturally) had Trump winning by a landslide, the same with Brexit. But, some would argue, it needs to look 'close'. It hampers what Trump can do (even if he's genuine and not already a part of what he argued against) and muddies the waters, leaving things open to change/challenge by politicians (Brexit).
Originally Posted by Trulytrue:
“I have not looked into the Sandy hook attack.
My own personal "elephant in the room" is the Nice truck. How does a truck that maimed and killed over 200 people stay so clean. Anyone who has ever hit a deer or a person or seen a road accident knows how far flesh and blood go.
We had people disembowelled, decapitated, limbs ripped off and yet the truck is clean. That makes my head hurt as I know its not possible and yet everyone believes it is.
...”
Great post and sorry for snipping (just for the length of my post here) - I agree with every word. It's exactly the same as the Russian Diplomat 'assassinated' in Turkey. Six shots wasn't it, and the first to his head? Get shot in the head and you'll immediately crumple into a pile on the floor. But oh no, this guy first looked a bit surprised, and then lay down nice and neat in a perfect 'cross' position. No blood whatsoever. Instead of running for their lives (just about the most proven response of all human behaviour) the camera folk carried on filming the assassin (who apparently evaded security on his way in with his weapons because he said he wasn't going to go through the metal detector). Still at least they showed blood all around him when
he was killed - they got something right.
Hang on I just need to pop out and feed my unicorn some fairy dust...I'll be back shortly...
Originally Posted by njp:
“Fake news is a very different beast from a conspiracy theory.
You can do the experiment on land. Sit in a wheelchair with the brakes off and a pile of bricks on your lap. Proceed to throw the bricks in front of you. You will move backwards in accordance with the same physical laws that rockets rely on. If you can minimise the friction by running on rails, the experiment will work even better.
C is just a number. Of course you can square it. The equation (of itself) tells you nothing about C as the ultimate speed limit. It does tell you that mass and energy are different forms of the same thing.
You could start one. Or you could ask here.”
Fake news is the new meme now that 'conspiracy theory' (coined by the CIA a year or two before JFK I repeat in case you missed it) doesn't hold any water, and they've been at it - hard - for weeks now.
Why the **** would I do an experiment on land to 'prove' how things 'work' in the vacuum of space?

A wheelchair and some bricks in an atmosphere compared to a rocket in a vacuum, are you serious?
C is 'just a number'? Einstein told us it's the speed of light, no? And those 'in the know' almost unanimously say you can't go faster. So how the **** do you square it? Or is it just theoretical? In which case (which I'm quite prepared to accept) it's NOT something that should or even could be accepted as truth - and yet it seems to be. One might call it a 'conspiracy theory' in fact!