And they still are.

What's the problem?

Well the thread starter got what he wanted, didn't he?

I think most people managed to elevate the discussion above childish insults against a person not here to defend herself. Some obvious failures though.

Good grief.

I don't think her actions are about hatred, she does display a contempt for the 17.5people who voted to leave, and I would feel the same if I had voted remain. She pretends she is doing this in the name of democracy because she doesn't have the guts to admit it is about self interest. However, she has an friend in remainer May, who has dragged her kitten heels, and allowed Millar and her co conspirators time to bring this action. If it failed I hope she has to pay costs, this is costing the taxpayer a huge amount of money.

It's not her fault the government and Brexiters didn't ensure in law that the referendum was binding.

Lol, how do you propose that May should prevent citizens exercising their democratic rights to ensure due process? By declaring the U.K. a facist state?

As for the actions failing, you're going to be sadly disappointed. The governments jig on this issue is well and truly up.

Cameron and Osborme prepared the legislation - they weren't Brexiteers as you put it. Nor was Mrs May who is now PM.

As for the advice from the people who do you think it was intended for - to advise parliament who passed the bill (why would they need to be advised again when they enacted the referendum bill) or the Government to exercise the Royal prerogative and give notice on article 50. Cameron stated clearly article 50 would be declared on 24 June if leave one - presumably for that very reason.

Parliament agreed the referendum bill - it has already expressed its view that the matter should be decided by the people. And the people voted and their vote should now be implemented.

No more respecting the people and their votes - we just need parliament to obey what the people directed them to do!

All these remoaners weren't too worried about parliamentary sovereignty when EU treaties and laws were taking powers away without any proper say or scrutiny by MPs. Odd now that it's going the other way they seem to have discovered their love for it - but what they forget is that the people in the end by voting trump parliament.

If there are loopholes in the process or legal niceties it is better they are blocked now before negotiations start, rather than later which would make the politicians look even more incompetent than we already know them to be.
"Oops, sorry Johnny Foreigner, can we adjourn while we pass some laws."

I can see these challenges going on for some time. The London elite including the legal profession are determined to block Brexit - as they think the country voted the wrong way and they think they know better.

But at least it's helpful that they are showing their hand on some issues.

This is just supposition on your part though. The government seems determined to get Brexit through, and they are the most important and influential section of the "elite".

Maybe I'm a bit less cynical about this. I think there is a strong case for making sure all the UK dominoes are lined up properly before we start the process. I don't blame the lawyers for doing what lawyers do, but I have nothing but scorn for the politicians for their lack of legislative preparation, given that Brexit was always a possibility.
Like you, I just want them to get on with Brexit, despite voting remain.
But the stories I am hearing from my son in Whitehall give me no confidence at all in Westminster's ability to achieve anything apart from lurch from crisis to crisis as each legislative implication is discovered. It is apparently chaotic at the moment and getting worse as they realise the size of the internal legislative task, let alone preparing a negotiating position to take to the EU.
That is going to bog the process down far more than any legal action in our courts.

For some reason most seem to ignore the implication of the leaflet. Hindsight seems to be a wonderful thing in that yes everyone knew the referendum was not binding but we have to consider what they were led to believe.

Desperate silly response

Is the implication of the leaflet the same as the promise on the side of a bus?

Tin foil alert!

I thought it was quite an appropriate response to the OP. I presume you disagree?

I am unaware I said there was a problem, I was pointing out that this referendum being advisory was nothing new they all have been other than AV

http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-n...y-jewelry-cars

The main reason (so I've heard) that she doesn't believe in democracy is that she's been in contact with citizens of Athens from back at the birth of democracy, and they were all a bit "meh" about how it has evolved since then.

That said, there's no doubt that she's not a very nice person at all, preying as she does on the vulnerability of those who believe the sort of nonsense that she spouts, and her mugshot doesn't do her any favours either.

But there's no mention anywhere that she's a friend of Merkel's. Perhaps Merkel's friends in the media covered this up.

I just think that Gina does not care as long she still gets her paycheck from Brussels, EU is designed to fund the super rich after all.

More silliness.

Well i back her for what she is doing.

And the mysterious Brazilian hairdresser right? He was the one who started the case after all, not Gina.

Brexit is happening, so remainers better accept it and move on with their lives. The country has been run for the interests of those who benefit from us being in Europe for the past 40 years, now the shoe is on the other foot, they are wailing and crying about it. Well tough.

You've got to love the gloating nastiness of the rabid Brexiteers, don't you. Still charging at windmills, thinking they're giants.