|
||||||||
FFS bringing back Michelle Fowler is a mistake IMO - EastEnders |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,362
|
FFS bringing back Michelle Fowler is a mistake IMO - EastEnders
Michelle Fowler is an iconic character but she's NOT Michelle IMO. FFS who is this impostor?? Jenna Russel is an OK actress but EE bosses can't expect me to welcome the iconic and legendary Michelle Fowler easily????? Susan Tully played Michelle for 10 years and they should have NEVER recast her IMO. Letitia Dean and Adam Woodyatt must be furious and pissed off the bosses stupidly recast Michelle IMO.
FFS BIG mistake!! Rant over!!! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 13
|
I think she is doing a fine job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,140
|
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 10,243
|
I think she is doing a grand job . I quite like her
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,779
|
They have obviously brought her back for a reason, rumours are that Grant and Mark are returning so she fits in. Maybe Susan told them that she would never return, so they would have no choice but to recast. I would give her more than a few episodes before writing her off. People said the same when Martin was recast but he's better than the original imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,972
|
It was about time. It should have been done years ago. And what's it got to do with the other actors...They get well paid to do a job and that's what they should be getting on with, not interfering in Executive decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,646
|
I'm 50/50 on it. Depends on what storylines she has. In an ideal world Sue would be back but I'm sure the new actress will make her mark. I'm sure I read somewhere that Adam and Letitia were happy about it as they know Jenna from old. Not that it matters. They all have to do what the producer wants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,918
|
Quote:
Michelle Fowler is an iconic character but she's NOT Michelle IMO. FFS who is this impostor?? Jenna Russel is an OK actress but EE bosses can't expect me to welcome the iconic and legendary Michelle Fowler easily????? Susan Tully played Michelle for 10 years and they should have NEVER recast her IMO. Letitia Dean and Adam Woodyatt must be furious and pissed off the bosses stupidly recast Michelle IMO.
FFS BIG mistake!! Rant over!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Emmerdale
Posts: 4,278
|
Quote:
Michelle Fowler is an iconic character but she's NOT Michelle IMO. FFS who is this impostor?? Jenna Russel is an OK actress but EE bosses can't expect me to welcome the iconic and legendary Michelle Fowler easily????? Susan Tully played Michelle for 10 years and they should have NEVER recast her IMO. Letitia Dean and Adam Woodyatt must be furious and pissed off the bosses stupidly recast Michelle IMO.
FFS BIG mistake!! Rant over!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: England
Posts: 3,806
|
The return of her character has meant I've tuned back in to EE for the first time in over ten years.
Time will tell if the show keeps my interest, but I am intrigued as to where this character is going to be taken. So I think it's been a brave and positive move. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 213
|
I think she's doing a good job so far.
Oh, and Susan Tully gave her blessing to the recast and helped Jenna, Sean and the writers about who Michelle was. And why would Letitia and Adam be pissed of with one of their friends joining the show taking on the role from another friend? Letitia Dean and Jenna Russell went to stage school together and have been friends for more than 30 years. Adam Woodyatt has also been a close friends as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,054
|
I wasn't around when the first Michelle was but I can understand why people are pissed off, it would be like recasting Kat or Stacey!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,357
|
Change takes time, Michelle is back this a new interpretation of the character, she won't be the same, because she isn't, people need to let go of this notion that everyone is going to hate her because she not Susan Tully.
Jenna Russell is doing a fine job, I'm not expecting everything to click in place within a week, writing and development will take time to settle in, some people are just too impatient and won't accept change. Letitia Dean and Adam Woodyatt according to the media have known Jenna for 30 years so why would they be upset, I think SOC went the right way about it, he approached Susan Tully and work with the actors to make sure she was the right pick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Home For The Bewildered
Posts: 86,510
|
I think it's too early to judge yet, though half the time I do have to keep reminding myself who she actually is.
I hope they don't go down the very predictable route of hooking her up with Max. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
I think the word iconic and legendary gets thrown around way too easily these days, Michelle certainly played a big part in the show's history but to describe her in those terms is wrong IMO. If Peggy could be recasted for the eventual greater good why can't Michelle? I loved the Fowlers back in the day but Michelle wasn't as important as say Pauline or Arthur. Even Mark Fowler, my favourite member of the family changed face. I don't agree with them recasting Martin either but the show had to move on, you have to give the new Michelle time. It's been so long that a fair amount of the audience won't even remember the original.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Emmerdale
Posts: 4,278
|
[quote=Paris Le Roc;84997535]Michelle is iconic, she is regarded as iconic by pretty much everyone who worked on the show and the media for the past week have described her as iconic. Michelle was the face of the story that lunched EastEnders to the success it became with her pregnancy storyline. The press never took any notice of the show until then, after that it was front page news for weeks. I'm sure Jenna Russell will be great as Chelle but don't play down the character or her history just to sell your own opinion of the facts.[/QUOTE
IMO it was Den and Angie that helped set the wheels in motion firstly. Afterall iconic and legendary labelling stems from opinion I think Michelle was big for her era mostly and that's it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,711
|
I really like Jenna playing Michelle. I'm intrigued as to what's going to happen with her as she's sure to be a long timer otherwise why recast such an iconic character after twenty years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,513
|
Michelle Fowler was involved in the storyline that really made the tabloids take notice of Eastenders - who was the father of Vicky - other than that she was selfish, whiny, miserable, cruel - leaving Lofty standing at the alter, then deigning to marry him only to have an abortion without even having the courtesy of letting him know what she was intending to do - this wasn't one of her one night stand pregnancies this was her husband! she always had a condescending attitude to her family even though they supported her through every disaster and crisis which was mostly of her own making, off screen she appears to have continued in her self absorbed behaviour - Vicky was difficult so she was packed off to live with Pauline, she has some kind of crisis of conscience and makes Peggy's death all about her by choosing this time to reveal Mark jnr's true father, doesn't bother to show up to her mother's, brother's uncle pete or Lucy's funeral (she can be forgiven for Arthur as she had just given birth to Mark)
I am glad they have recast Michelle, I don't consider her to be iconic but she is of course one of the originals, however unless there is a very good reason why she has abandoned her son and current husband at Christmas she is unfortunately the same self centred self absorbed person she has always been and I am hoping that Sharon, Ian or Martin or all three point out a few home truths to her! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,466
|
She's ok to be fair too Soon to judge. They will definitely pair her and Max
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,909
|
Quote:
I think the word iconic and legendary gets thrown around way too easily these days, Michelle certainly played a big part in the show's history but to describe her in those terms is wrong IMO. If Peggy could be recasted for the eventual greater good why can't Michelle? I loved the Fowlers back in the day but Michelle wasn't as important as say Pauline or Arthur. Even Mark Fowler, my favourite member of the family changed face. I don't agree with them recasting Martin either but the show had to move on, you have to give the new Michelle time. It's been so long that a fair amount of the audience won't even remember the original.
I do agree though about giving the new one a chance at least. Even though so far every line she speaks I imagine Sue Tully saying it and thinking "would Michelle have said that?" But I think as time goes on that'll stop! Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: With My Courtney Mitchell
Posts: 1,084
|
Quote:
Michelle Fowler is an iconic character but she's NOT Michelle IMO. FFS who is this impostor?? Jenna Russel is an OK actress but EE bosses can't expect me to welcome the iconic and legendary Michelle Fowler easily????? Susan Tully played Michelle for 10 years and they should have NEVER recast her IMO. Letitia Dean and Adam Woodyatt must be furious and pissed off the bosses stupidly recast Michelle IMO.
FFS BIG mistake!! Rant over!!! |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Emmerdale
Posts: 4,278
|
Quote:
Hmm not quite sure you can compare the recasting of Peggy when the first one was in it for just ten, yes TEN episodes, to the recasting of Michelle who was in it for ten years!!
I do agree though about giving the new one a chance at least. Even though so far every line she speaks I imagine Sue Tully saying it and thinking "would Michelle have said that?" But I think as time goes on that'll stop! Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,236
|
I suppose the closest would be Sam Mitchell and people were able to accept Kim.
I thought Kim was great but she wasn't Sam for me. I wonder if Jenna will be the same for me. I wasn't invested in Martin or Ben as characters as I was with Michelle as I too was a teenage girl back in the 80s and related to her struggles. Daniella's Sam arrived as part of the Mitchell clan and was involved in the Butcher era so it was a part of EE history too imo. I am happy to give Jenna's Michelle time to embed with her onscreen family. Time will tell. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Hiding from Aaron
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
Michelle Fowler is an iconic character but she's NOT Michelle IMO. FFS who is this impostor?? Jenna Russel is an OK actress but EE bosses can't expect me to welcome the iconic and legendary Michelle Fowler easily????? Susan Tully played Michelle for 10 years and they should have NEVER recast her IMO. Letitia Dean and Adam Woodyatt must be furious and pissed off the bosses stupidly recast Michelle IMO.
FFS BIG mistake!! Rant over!!! Michelle's been on-screen for less than a week. So far all she's done is visit family members, so isn't it a bit too soon to judge? Yes Michelle was a big character due to the fact that she was an original etc, but she was only in the show for ten years, which is just under a 1/3 of the show's time on air. If the producers want to bring a character back and the original actress doesn't want to return, they should be allowed to recast - it's not like they went against Susan's wishes as she agreed to the recast! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,006
|
Quote:
Michelle Fowler was involved in the storyline that really made the tabloids take notice of Eastenders - who was the father of Vicky - other than that she was selfish, whiny, miserable, cruel - leaving Lofty standing at the alter, then deigning to marry him only to have an abortion without even having the courtesy of letting him know what she was intending to do - this wasn't one of her one night stand pregnancies this was her husband! she always had a condescending attitude to her family even though they supported her through every disaster and crisis which was mostly of her own making, off screen she appears to have continued in her self absorbed behaviour - Vicky was difficult so she was packed off to live with Pauline, she has some kind of crisis of conscience and makes Peggy's death all about her by choosing this time to reveal Mark jnr's true father, doesn't bother to show up to her mother's, brother's uncle pete or Lucy's funeral (she can be forgiven for Arthur as she had just given birth to Mark)
I am glad they have recast Michelle, I don't consider her to be iconic but she is of course one of the originals, however unless there is a very good reason why she has abandoned her son and current husband at Christmas she is unfortunately the same self centred self absorbed person she has always been and I am hoping that Sharon, Ian or Martin or all three point out a few home truths to her! . Chelle was always a scruffy looking frump with a face like a slapped arse. Why she's been put on a pedestal of perfection is beyond me. Probably an unpopular opinion but I watched EE from the first episode and remember the pregnancy and who dunnit really well - I don't think if you are young you can comprehend 3 TV channels that went off at night and how massive soaps were then. Everyone was talking about it. No one got any work done in school on reveal day. It was pre internet, pre spoilers, pre everything and we were obsessed with finding out. Even so I didn't not see Michelle as untouchable as an icon. Maybe because I never liked her because her face was always tripping her?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:31.




Lol
. Chelle was always a scruffy looking frump with a face like a slapped arse. Why she's been put on a pedestal of perfection is beyond me. Probably an unpopular opinion but I watched EE from the first episode and remember the pregnancy and who dunnit really well - I don't think if you are young you can comprehend 3 TV channels that went off at night and how massive soaps were then. Everyone was talking about it. No one got any work done in school on reveal day. It was pre internet, pre spoilers, pre everything and we were obsessed with finding out. Even so I didn't not see Michelle as untouchable as an icon. Maybe because I never liked her because her face was always tripping her?