|
||||||||
Israel/Palestinie, Who's Side You On And Why? |
| View Poll Results: Who's Side You On, Israel or Palestine, or Both/Neither? | |||
| Israel |
|
50 | 27.78% |
| Palestine |
|
47 | 26.11% |
| Both |
|
16 | 8.89% |
| Neither |
|
67 | 37.22% |
| Voters: 180. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#201 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,744
|
Quote:
Just a fact. As seen on here. If you question the state of Israel's aggressive murders and acts that contravene international law, you are branded an anti-semite, and the holocaust is disgustingly wheeled out as a kind of trump card.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#202 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,223
|
It's very simple to me, Israel have an aggressive regime that at best see Palestinians as an inconvenience to their state and have continued to persecute and corrall people into what are effectively large concentration camps.
The fact that this is from a people who have been persecuted themselves is what makes it so abhorrent to me. I also hate the way they cry Antisemitism as they think it'll make people leave them be to commit heinous crimes, criticism of the Israelite regime is not the same as racism towards jewish people which is also unacceptable. Yes, the Palestinians also use violence to make their case which is wrong, but an integrated peaceful state should be the goal here. But when you're fighting a bigger more powerful enemy with the full backing of the US government, how do you make your voice heard? I'd also recommend the channel 4 drama The Promise from a few years ago, it shows the early days of occupation and the effects its had in the meantime, very powerful stuff imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#203 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mid Wales / Canolbarth Cymru
Posts: 37,481
|
Quote:
The holocaust is not a trump card, it's a fact. As is the fact that Israels Arab neighbours tried to perform a repeat act at the nations birth. As is the fact that it's enemies sworn goal remains it's destruction. These may be inconvenient statistics to you but they are relatives to me. As a result I take them kind of personally. The Israelis, we the Jews, just want to be left in peace for a bit, on a scrap of land, rescued mostly from the desert. I'm sorry that this seemingly simple request makes you so inexplicably angry in a world full of chaos, war and genocide, even today. And pardon me if I invite you to deposit your sanctimony where the sun doesn't shine.
From the outside looking in (i.e with no connections or strong feelings for either 'side') it is pretty clear that the state of Israel is an oppresive aggressor, as the numerous examples explained by contributors to this thread have shown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mid Wales / Canolbarth Cymru
Posts: 37,481
|
Quote:
It's very simple to me, Israel have an aggressive regime that at best see Palestinians as an inconvenience to their state and have continued to persecute and corrall people into what are effectively large concentration camps.
The fact that this is from a people who have been persecuted themselves is what makes it so abhorrent to me. I also hate the way they cry Antisemitism as they think it'll make people leave them be to commit heinous crimes, criticism of the Israelite regime is not the same as racism towards jewish people which is also unacceptable. Yes, the Palestinians also use violence to make their case which is wrong, but an integrated peaceful state should be the goal here. But when you're fighting a bigger more powerful enemy with the full backing of the US government, how do you make your voice heard? I'd also recommend the channel 4 drama The Promise from a few years ago, it shows the early days of occupation and the effects its had in the meantime, very powerful stuff imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#205 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 279
|
Quote:
It's very simple to me, Israel have an aggressive regime that at best see Palestinians as an inconvenience to their state and have continued to persecute and corrall people into what are effectively large concentration camps.
The fact that this is from a people who have been persecuted themselves is what makes it so abhorrent to me. I also hate the way they cry Antisemitism as they think it'll make people leave them be to commit heinous crimes, criticism of the Israelite regime is not the same as racism towards jewish people which is also unacceptable. Yes, the Palestinians also use violence to make their case which is wrong, but an integrated peaceful state should be the goal here. But when you're fighting a bigger more powerful enemy with the full backing of the US government, how do you make your voice heard? I'd also recommend the channel 4 drama The Promise from a few years ago, it shows the early days of occupation and the effects its had in the meantime, very powerful stuff imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#206 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort William
Posts: 22,270
|
Quote:
The holocaust is not a trump card, it's a fact. As is the fact that Israels Arab neighbours tried to perform a repeat act at the nations birth. As is the fact that it's enemies sworn goal remains it's destruction. These may be inconvenient statistics to you but they are relatives to me. As a result I take them kind of personally. The Israelis, we the Jews, just want to be left in peace for a bit, on a scrap of land, rescued mostly from the desert. I'm sorry that this seemingly simple request makes you so inexplicably angry in a world full of chaos, war and genocide, even today. And pardon me if I invite you to deposit your sanctimony where the sun doesn't shine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#207 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 279
|
Quote:
On a scrap of land that was owned and farmed by people they threw off. It wasn't their land to take, even if you call it a scrap. Therein lies the problem.
A) The Palestinians refused to accept the partitioning of their country, but the Israelis decided they would and went for it. B) The emergent states never actually fell within the geographical boundaries of the UN mandate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#208 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
It's very simple to me, Israel have an aggressive regime that at best see Palestinians as an inconvenience to their state and have continued to persecute and corrall people into what are effectively large concentration camps.
The fact that this is from a people who have been persecuted themselves is what makes it so abhorrent to me. I also hate the way they cry Antisemitism as they think it'll make people leave them be to commit heinous crimes, criticism of the Israelite regime is not the same as racism towards jewish people which is also unacceptable. Yes, the Palestinians also use violence to make their case which is wrong, but an integrated peaceful state should be the goal here. But when you're fighting a bigger more powerful enemy with the full backing of the US government, how do you make your voice heard? I'd also recommend the channel 4 drama The Promise from a few years ago, it shows the early days of occupation and the effects its had in the meantime, very powerful stuff imo. How do explain this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fv_o2Lmo5xw?. Can you tell us why the 'concentration camp' has hotels on Trip Advisor? https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/Hotel_...City_Gaza.html. |
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 279
|
As an aside to all this debate, we're going to Krakow in Poland this weekend, and I'm a bit troubled by this, but there's a plan to visit Auschwitz. On the one hand it appals me that it should be some sort of tourist destination, but on the other I feel I should visit and pay some sort of respect. Are there any Jewish contributors to this board who could assist me in how to do this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#210 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,814
|
Quote:
I can't be bothered trawling the internet (again) but respectfully refer you to the wiki article I posted re borders and the ever changing rules and views in this subject.
We clearly live in different worlds. Islamists kill innocent civilians quite intentionally, completely randomly and without even the slightest regard for human life. And in massive numbers You can what you like about proportionality (another elastic concept) but Israel does none of these things and your response to that which it does, remains massively disproportionate, whilst you engage in endless whataboutery when challenged on the subject. I'm done and back to work tomorrow. But I shall keep my eye on this forum, you'll be delighted to hear... ![]() You seemingly don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#211 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,278
|
Quote:
As an aside to all this debate, we're going to Krakow in Poland this weekend, and I'm a bit troubled by this, but there's a plan to visit Auschwitz. On the one hand it appals me that it should be some sort of tourist destination, but on the other I feel I should visit and pay some sort of respect. Are there any Jewish contributors to this board who could assist me in how to do this?
I'd love to visit there myself. It would be like paying respects to those who died in that awful place, and all the other camps around Europe which no longer exist. |
|
|
|
|
|
#212 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,042
|
Quote:
It's very simple to me, Israel have an aggressive regime that at best see Palestinians as an inconvenience to their state and have continued to persecute and corrall people into what are effectively large concentration camps.
The fact that this is from a people who have been persecuted themselves is what makes it so abhorrent to me. I also hate the way they cry Antisemitism as they think it'll make people leave them be to commit heinous crimes, criticism of the Israelite regime is not the same as racism towards jewish people which is also unacceptable. Yes, the Palestinians also use violence to make their case which is wrong, but an integrated peaceful state should be the goal here. But when you're fighting a bigger more powerful enemy with the full backing of the US government, how do you make your voice heard? I'd also recommend the channel 4 drama The Promise from a few years ago, it shows the early days of occupation and the effects its had in the meantime, very powerful stuff imo. Quote:
Therein lies the problem I think. You're too involved and subjective.
From the outside looking in (i.e with no connections or strong feelings for either 'side') it is pretty clear that the state of Israel is an oppresive aggressor, as the numerous examples explained by contributors to this thread have shown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#213 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 18,566
|
I used to be for Palestine but realised the whole situation is far more complicated than I thought....so I've voted for neither.
Hope Palestine and Israel come to some sort of agreement this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,814
|
Quote:
BIB. Regardless of this, you are on the side of terrorism.
The strange thing is that if the islamic terrorists ceased their aggression there could be a peaceful solution. Israel just doesn't like doing deals with Palestinians. |
|
|
|
|
|
#215 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,042
|
Quote:
Unlikely. Islamism in the shape of Hamas are relative newcomers on the scene, who were aided when they were starting up ironically enough by Israel, to act as a counterweight to Israel's great enemies the (secular) PLO.
Israel just doesn't like doing deals with Palestinians. |
|
|
|
|
|
#216 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort William
Posts: 22,270
|
Quote:
I disagree. They do , however, find it difficult to talk to people who want to totally destroy them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,814
|
Quote:
I disagree. They do , however, find it difficult to talk to people who want to totally destroy them.
Why would Israel want to enter into meaningful negotiations? |
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Unlikely. Islamism in the shape of Hamas are relative newcomers on the scene, who were aided when they were starting up ironically enough by Israel, to act as a counterweight to Israel's great enemies the (secular) PLO.
Israel just doesn't like doing deals with Palestinians. Netanyahu, like him or not is the just the latest in a long line in the list of Prime Minsters. It was Bibi who said last year 'the door was open with no conditions' and also offered to stop all settlements for a year in return he wanted an end to incitement. Peace talks should be undertaken by new unbiased and impartial NGO because the UN is no longer fit for purpose. It took Putin to get the Syrian peace treaty signed. There is centre-left Isreali's who are critical of Likud policy and so there are Israeli politicians who want to try a different appoach. |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,744
|
Quote:
As an aside to all this debate, we're going to Krakow in Poland this weekend, and I'm a bit troubled by this, but there's a plan to visit Auschwitz. On the one hand it appals me that it should be some sort of tourist destination, but on the other I feel I should visit and pay some sort of respect. Are there any Jewish contributors to this board who could assist me in how to do this?
It does seem odd at various levels, but the key thing is to "never forget" and people have to see this stuff hands on to appreciate that it actually happened, to try to stop it happening again. Incredible thing is, it already has in Africa, Sudan and Bosnia, to name a few. Let us know how you found it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#220 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,744
|
Quote:
Yes. I live in the one governed by current international law.
You seemingly don't. My point being that the UN is a fine thing in many respects but it's only qualification for membership is existence and the makeup of its many component parts overtly political in nature. People take the stuff that works for them. It's not a panacea to every ill in the world, it doesn't of itself prove your case on the Israel /Palestine conflict (although you pretend it does) and governments worldwide ignore its proclamations and those of other creatures of PIL with impunity, each and every day. I'm blue in the face from admitting that Israel is building settlements in breach of PIL In fact it's in breach if it's own bloody laws. But the solution doesn't lie in black letter Israeli law, or black letter Palestinian Authority law and the numerous breaches which it and Hamas and the rest have been guilty of down the years (and of which you say nowt) but in people's hearts and minds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#221 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,744
|
Quote:
Therein lies the problem I think. You're too involved and subjective.
From the outside looking in (i.e with no connections or strong feelings for either 'side') it is pretty clear that the state of Israel is an oppresive aggressor, as the numerous examples explained by contributors to this thread have shown. As for the history of the "scrap of land" borders change, people move or have to move for complex geopolitical reasons, however morally questionable. Look at the creation of India and Pakistan. And dozens, probably hundreds of other examples down the centuries. Every refugee from WW2 moved on; why not the Palestinians? |
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,312
|
Israeli justice minister considers bill to grant Benjamin Netanyahu immunity in case he faces corruption charges
So Bibi would be above the law. |
|
|
|
|
|
#223 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,814
|
Quote:
Islamism is the purest form Islam. [1]Most of the population of Gaza are Muslims, so it would be almost impossible to enforce Islam on people.
Netanyahu, like him or not is the just the latest in a long line in the list of Prime Minsters. It was Bibi who said last year 'the door was open with no conditions' and also offered to stop all settlements for a year in return he wanted an end to incitement. [2]Peace talks should be undertaken by new unbiased and impartial NGO because the UN is no longer fit for purpose. It took Putin to get the Syrian peace treaty signed. There is centre-left Isreali's who are critical of Likud policy and so there are Israeli politicians who want to try a different appoach. 2. Because it dares to point out to Israel that it continually breaks international law? |
|
|
|
|
|
#224 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,814
|
Quote:
The first thing I learned when studying public international law back in 87 was that there is absolutely no such thing as PIL. It's like the bloody Matrix.
My point being that the UN is a fine thing in many respects but it's only qualification for membership is existence and the makeup of its many component parts overtly political in nature. People take the stuff that works for them. It's not a panacea to every ill in the world, it doesn't of itself prove your case on the Israel /Palestine conflict (although you pretend it does) and governments worldwide ignore its proclamations and those of other creatures of PIL with impunity, each and every day. I'm blue in the face from admitting that Israel is building settlements in breach of PIL In fact it's in breach if it's own bloody laws. But the solution doesn't lie in black letter Israeli law, or black letter Palestinian Authority law and the numerous breaches which it and Hamas and the rest have been guilty of down the years (and of which you say nowt) but in people's hearts and minds. Basically, you don't like it because they dare to condemn Israel on various matters and you can only say "Ah, but country X is worse - why don't they condemn them?". They do of course, but you pretend they don't. And what breaches of international law by other countries do I ignore, as a matter of interest? It can't be the likes of Hamas or Saudi Arabia, as I always condemn them too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,814
|
Quote:
I have honest, open and strong personal reasons for my views which have zero to do with religion, per se, or your great devil "Zionism". Doesn't make them any less valid. Your view seems born entirely of the student union bar; so which is the more honest, or persuasive? And what part of my post can you really challenge?
As for the history of the "scrap of land" borders change, people move or have to move for complex geopolitical reasons, however morally questionable. Look at the creation of India and Pakistan. And dozens, probably hundreds of other examples down the centuries. Every refugee from WW2 moved on; why not the Palestinians? Oh, and the Palestinians were forcibly moved on - hadn't you heard? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:19.




