|
||||||||
Steve Martin deletes Carrie Fisher tribute tweet after people criticise him for calli |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 1,973
|
Quote:
One of the twitter posters quoted by the DS article linked in the original post is now being "shamed" and "slammed" himself. He maintains that his post was intended sarcastically.
Sigh. When did things posted on Twitter become news? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 716
|
Well the DS bingo card certainly filled up quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: East London
Posts: 25,845
|
Have they had a go at Billy Dee Williams yet for saying "You look absolutely beautiful. You truly belong here with us among the clouds." ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 1,973
|
I think we're going to hit a point very few people will comment on things so you'll simply never hear from them anymore...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 53,385
|
Nothing wrong with it and I'm annoyed he caved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,207
|
Quote:
Ridiculous in your eyes. Never more apt and appropriate in mine. I was very slow to adopt use of the term but do so now because it is seemingly more fitting than ever.
In just one week we've had this, the Richard Hammond ice cream scandal and some other piece of bull floating around about a Christmas photo of a family that was "colourist" due to their seating positions. People so desperate to see what they want to see to further the PC cause. I don't go anywhere near Tw4tter. My problem is that these things quickly permeate from their into the mainstream press, and thus the process of brainwashing of the impressionable and the snowflakes, telling them what to feel offended about, continues... As for seating positions, might it not be down to who the individuals want to sit with? |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,990
|
Michael Parkinson in recent interview described Mohammad Ali as beautiful. Was he being sexist?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,717
|
Quote:
""When I was a young man, Carrie Fisher she was the most beautiful creature I had ever seen. She turned out to be bright and witty as well," he wrote."
I find it incredibly sad that people are offended by this. I think it was a wonderful compliment. That from the very beginning he knew she was beautiful but then he came to see that she was also an intelligent and witty woman. Isn't this what we want, as women? For our female celebrities and role models not to just be seen for their looks, but for their minds and wit as well? She was very beautiful, that is a fact. While I would find it a shame for a tribute to focus solely on her looks when she was so much more, I see nothing wrong with mentioning the fact that, on first glance and without knowing more, she was simply beautiful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,990
|
Do the people who describe such comments as sexist believe we should deny people have a physical aspect?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In a building
Posts: 23,980
|
He should have kept it up. We need to fight back when thing's get as ridiculous as this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,340
|
Quote:
"Colourist"? - what the chuff does that even mean?
As for seating positions, might it not be down to who the individuals want to sit with? Apparently there's a black American comedian, actor and male model called Lance Gross. He shared a photo on twitter that showed 4 male/female couples sitting together smiling and one woman, slightly off to the side looking a bit grumpy. Everyone in the picture is an African American. The woman who is sitting on her own, and not part of a couple has the darkest skin tone of the women in the picture. Some people noticed that and had a bit of a problem with it, saying it was exclusionary to darker skinned black women, that the men are showing favouritism to lighter skinned black women and things like that. Some people stated they would boycott his films in the future. He's saying that skin colour had nothing to do with it and that as the only single person in the picture she was looking grumpy as a joke, playing the role of the disgruntled singleton and they'd posed in a similar way at previous Christmases. So "colourism" would be discrimination of someone based on their particular shade of skin within a race rather than the race itself, I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In a building
Posts: 23,980
|
Quote:
Do the people who describe such comments as sexist believe we should deny people have a physical aspect?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,618
|
I think people are just addicted to outrage!
Knobs! |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,661
|
I get the point that it's probably overblown and a case of the outraged being outraged at The Outraged Two but he did feel the need to delete which is a shame. People are stupid. He said nothing wrong. Do some of these rights ons realise that they are doing 'their cause' - people who really are discrimnated against - such a disservice. They need to stop playing Grown Ups on the Internet. Quote:
"Colourist"? - what the chuff does that even mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,054
|
You can always tell a Daily Mail reader from their use of the phrase 'right on' despite the fact that nobody has used that since 1976.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,661
|
Quote:
You can always tell a Daily Mail reader from their use of the phrase 'right on' despite the fact that nobody has used that since 1976.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 43,317
|
Quote:
Just been reading about that I was curious myself.
Apparently there's a black American comedian, actor and male model called Lance Gross. He shared a photo on twitter that showed 4 male/female couples sitting together smiling and one woman, slightly off to the side looking a bit grumpy. Everyone in the picture is an African American. The woman who is sitting on her own, and not part of a couple has the darkest skin tone of the women in the picture. Some people noticed that and had a bit of a problem with it, saying it was exclusionary to darker skinned black women, that the men are showing favouritism to lighter skinned black women and things like that. Some people stated they would boycott his films in the future. He's saying that skin colour had nothing to do with it and that as the only single person in the picture she was looking grumpy as a joke, playing the role of the disgruntled singleton and they'd posed in a similar way at previous Christmases. So "colourism" would be discrimination of someone based on their particular shade of skin within a race rather than the race itself, I think. We aren't immune to it here, of course, though here it's darkening skin rather than lightening it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,311
|
Does anyone doubt that beauty was part of what made her famous and popular? And is there anything wrong with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,130
|
Quote:
I find it incredibly sad that people are offended by this. I think it was a wonderful compliment. That from the very beginning he knew she was beautiful but then he came to see that she was also an intelligent and witty woman.
Isn't this what we want, as women? For our female celebrities and role models not to just be seen for their looks, but for their minds and wit as well? She was very beautiful, that is a fact. While I would find it a shame for a tribute to focus solely on her looks when she was so much more, I see nothing wrong with mentioning the fact that, on first glance and without knowing more, she was simply beautiful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,518
|
lucky he didn't call her 'ugly'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: on the edge of nowhere
Posts: 7,227
|
Quote:
I don't go anywhere near Tw4tter. My problem is that these things quickly permeate from their into the mainstream press, and thus the process of brainwashing of the impressionable and the snowflakes, telling them what to feel offended about, continues...
Well as far as I can see, no-one in this thread is offended by his tweet. Don't criticise tweets being used as news if you are happy for them to be the subject of threads - either they are important enough to discuss or they're not. Just throwing around cliches does not a discussion make.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Here--------->
Posts: 12,398
|
Quote:
Nicely put - yes I agree with you absolutely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,518
|
Quote:
Does anyone doubt that beauty was part of what made her famous and popular? And is there anything wrong with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,311
|
Quote:
how do we know if Hattie Jaques had got the role then Princess Leia wouldn't have been even more iconic ?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,518
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:44.



