• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EE & the killing of Roxy/Ronnie.Biggest blunder since Pat Butcher.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Broken_Arrow
31-12-2016
Originally Posted by Aura101:
“how dare you! change your tone ”

They are incredibly tedious though. How can anyone enjoy watching them repeat the same rubbish on a loop year in, year out? Maybe Ronnie shouldn't be killed off since she at least has changed over the years but Roxy, with or without Ronnie, is boring as ****. Awful actress and character.
cobis
31-12-2016
I will be disappointed if they are not killed off. I just don't see where they can go next,

Ronnie has neatly got away with killing two people, has managed to fashion together a family of children only one of which actually belongs to her, is on and off with Jack continuously, where else is there for her to go? another murder? another pretend child? another falling out/wedding to Jack?

Roxy just lurches from one drunken escapade to another which is starting to look a bit silly now she is older, no progress made, no direction, no job even

I think this branch of the Mitchell family has run out of steam, and I want to see how Jack copes as a single parent, he was so keen to keep Amy and Richard, might not be so easy without a convenient female babysitter to hand!
Broken_Arrow
31-12-2016
I hope they play "Dirrty" at Roxy's funeral.
pete137
31-12-2016
THEY ARE NOT BOTH DYING.

I guarantee it.
finlux
01-01-2017
Originally Posted by CherryRose:
“I think killing them both off is a mistake”

I agree. They may need a "rest" but if written for correctly, there is STILL mileage in R&R.

Originally Posted by pete137:
“THEY ARE NOT BOTH DYING.

I guarantee it.”

I bloody hope you're right....
davejc64
01-01-2017
While Pat Butcher definitely was a big blunder, killing her off wasn't.
ArthurJBear
01-01-2017
Originally Posted by bumpandgrind:
“1. It's not confirmed they die. Pure speculation. Although I suspect at least one of them will.
2. SOC is doing an excellent job in making characters interesting again - including R&R.
3. Their story over the past couple of months has actually been a good slow burner. Ronnie and Jack effectively taking Roxy's daughter away from her as she then starts to self destruct. It's human. It's real. It's a darn sight better than a sensationalist build up.
4. We now have Glenda and Danny on the scene - which means it's likely to have more plot twists than originally expected.
5. EE have leaked what they want to leak.
6. IT HASN'T EVEN AIRED YET.”

B&G - you have saved me having to post - you summed up what I was going to say - I too think it will be one (fingers crossed Ronnie) that dies - The Sock has mad both these characters engaging again - a fairly simple task with Roxy but surprised he was able to do it with Ronnie who's character had been well and truly assassinated - and surprised that Samantha was able (to some extent pull it off considering her 'can not be arsed' style of acting we've had for the past ten years - I too think D&G will have a part to play that we don't see coming - and that The Sock and TPTB have 'run' with The Sun's speculative ending to troll us into thinking that bit will have a very wet death so that we won't see the real ending coming - I (we) may be wrong and it could go down The Sun's 'Dead Pool' route but even if it does I am confident that, considering the improvements The Sock has mad of late, he will pull it off - also I don't see why the killing of major character (I won't use the term 'legacy' as I consider Lucy to be the only 'legacy' caracter to be killed off - being descended from the Beale's) I'd much rather tat than a 'black cab' exit
lordo350
01-01-2017
There's no comparison OP.

Pat was an iconic, timeless character that still had her place on the square. Simply by being there she lighted up a room and improved a storyline. She was the tough old bird everyone relied on. She'd had storyline after storyline, and excelled every time. If any character deserved to go off into the sunset, it was her. 20 years of service to the show - and they killed her for wanting a break.

R&R have had their moments but good god are these characters tired. Look me in the eye and tell me either of them have had any development since 2007. This storyline could be happening then and it wouldn't seem to out of place. Plus, Ronnie was killed as a tragic character in 2011 and Roxy has never been that likeable (apart from, ironically, the Newman years).

I doubt the show is going to really miss them.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map