Originally Posted by Moany Liza:
“I'm sure you can put any interpretation on it that you choose.
I made a considerable number of contributions to various charities myself this Christmas, including Crisis at Christmas, Social Bite, DementiaUK, Motor Neurone Disease Association, Pancreatic Cancer Research, SSPCA and the White Helmets.
Forgive me then if I am underwhelmed by a bunch of multi-millionaires donating their reheated leftovers, when they could easily have done a lot more. I found it to be both liberating and satisfying to give money to good causes than to waste it on stuff that prosperous people neither need nor want. If I had the staggering wealth of the Kardashians I would gladly do considerably more.
Now, would you like to talk again about nastiness and bitterness?”
The thing is, we don't know if they do do a lot more - most people with a high level of earnings donate to charity (it's tax deductible

) and are patrons of various charities. It's good for their image, it works for Angelina Jolie

I don't know much about the Kardashians other than they are a product of our time - famous for doing nothing, but that's as much down to the public as it is to their publicist. Kim Kardashian's not on Time's list of 100 most influential people or worth $45m by herself, people buy into the crap she's selling.
On the other hand, 100 people had a nice Christmas lunch