I hope they portray it accurately. It will be interesting for me to see how it's handled nowadays.
I had a stillbirth in 1965 in the days before scans and husbands being present at the birth. The only clue to something being wrong was that the baby's head wasn't down, but breach births weren't uncommon. My waters broke and I went into hospital. No baby heartbeat could be found and my husband was told it was 50/50 if either of us survived so who should they try to save. He chose me and was sent home and told to phone in the morning, not knowing if I would be alive or not. I was told nothing. Not even after the baby was delivered and didn't cry. When my husband honed he was told the situation and to come in to get the death certificate so he could arrange a funeral. Neither of us saw him.
I went home after 10 days with no support and had a breakdown, not going out because I thought people could see I wasn't normal. I was told to pull myself together, which I had sufficient strength of character to do and got a job to start the next day. If I hadn't started working again the next day I would have thought about getting back to normal but have slid further into depression nstead. It was never mentioned again, but I couldn't have children.
I had to find out for myself what went wrong. How different things would have been nowadays. So I hope it is handled accurately and sensitively.
The question someone asked about if it runs in families, I think it might because an aunt had exactly the same thing happen to her - a breach stillbirth and unable to conceive afterwards.