Originally Posted by KornerKabin:
“Doesn't clarify anything, I'm afraid. I understand and respect your opinion but disagree that it was 'completely out of place' in EastEnders. In my view it has a perfect place in the show, a gentle nod to things that viewers will already know about but not having any impact on those that don't. I would like to emphasise my use of the word gentle. All the nods and references to Ronnie and Roxy's time on the show were just that: gentle. I didn't really see them as contrivances. There are far more contrived goings on in most soaps these days, small moments like these are almost insignificant.
Where is the believable, character-led narrative though? That hasn't been a staple part of EastEnders or any other British soap for at least a decade now. I want solid characters and strong, character-driven drama. I agree with you that this is an integral part of British soap. This kind of writing is the only way to keep them grounded and not darting off to the realms of the absurd.
In my opinion, EastEnders has positioned itself in a firm middle-ground with this episode, producing something between 'shock' and 'explosive' drama and the more character-led elements. The deaths being fully accidental were, in my view, one of the main markers of this. No drawn out revenge plot, whodunnit or melodramatic fight on top of a building. Just two characters doing something that they really shouldn't have which ended in tragedy. It could've happened to any one of us if the circumstances were dangerous enough. To me that's far more powerful than an explosion every other week that has no lasting impact.”
I certainly don't want explosions every other week. That approach has damaged Coronation Street hugely in my opinion, although that is a different thread and the reasons behind it more complex than mere fireworks.
You are right about British soaps in the last 10 years and it's a huge pity. Increased number of episodes, attempts to appeal to a particular demographic and pressure from bosses to make rating peaks.
For me anything on screen in EastEnders that takes me outside of the show is out of place. Playing fast and loose with established backstory and resurrecting dead characters is much worse, but it is all part of the same issue and it hurts the show. For me doing these things are absurd. A scene of dance and frivolity at a wedding is indeed perfectly in place. But it should not have been stylised in the form it was. Instead a capture of a moment in time at the wedding would have been much more effective.
When the writing is good there is no need to throw in these gimmicks.
I'm being very critical of all this and I stand by it, it my opinion, but I can say I thought the Carter aspect of the episode was much stronger. It was well written and leads to a very human dilema for Mick. How can he forget the unforgivable? Can he stop loving his son? Should he help his son who is in a very dangerous position given his recent mental health. Now that is powerful drama without and easy solutions (I hope).
So while you disagee, which is your absolute right, I think I have again clarified my point.