|
||||||||
EE: The drowniest swimming pool ever! |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 10,245
|
Quote:
People can drown in 3 inches of water in the right circumstances you absolute fool. Nothing about this was unrealistic.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,308
|
Quote:
They should have stood up then
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,108
|
Quote:
They should have stood up then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 565
|
Quote:
Did nobody do lifesaving at school when you had to wear your pyjamas in the swimming pool? Even that was hard to swim in, never mind layers of veils and beading.
Seems a perfectly logical (and painfully tragic) way to go in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 528
|
Quote:
The depth of the water had no relevance to their deaths.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 528
|
Quote:
If you've been knocked unconscious and your nose and mouth are in the water you cant stand up
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Sixth Circle of Hell
Posts: 20,174
|
Quote:
They should have stood up then
Did you see how deep it was? Regardless you can drown in a puddle. The Universe has an infinite number of ways to kill someone and drowning is one of the most ubiquitous |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
WTF??? Sheer absurdity.
They could clearly both swim hence their enthusiasm for going for a midnight dip. Any hotel swimming pool is not going to be any deeper than 6ft max, yet they both get into trouble and drown. Pathetic. It would have been more realistic if they drowned in the river going off the bridge earlier in the evening, but that was clearly more difficult for the lazy EE production crew to film. Terrible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 888
|
Looked like Roxy was having some kind of seizure on the bottom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,884
|
Did Roxy pull her under??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
I never knew they were both fourteen feet tall.
Did you see how deep it was? Regardless you can drown in a puddle. The Universe has an infinite number of ways to kill someone and drowning is one of the most ubiquitous |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 990
|
Roxy was on drugs??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 990
|
I'm guessing the water would be cold too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,017
|
Its interesting how different people see different things. For me, I saw:
1. Roxy laying STILL near/on the bottom of the pool. 2. When Ronnie jumped in her veil/dress wrapped around her, but it was made of netting and so wouldn't have suffocated her. 3. You could see them both near the bottom of the pool, but you could also see them near to the surface, as this was clearly visable. 4. Ronnie could easily have stood up and wiped the veil from her face. Oh and lots of people seem to think Ronnie left the poolside to take her dress off before calling to Roxy. I didn't see that at all. I saw her on the poolside trying to undo the front of her dress and struggling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 888
|
I don't think so, she had a bag of coke but didn't take it. Max found it on the bed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 565
|
I already put this into the episode thread but it fits here too
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:31.


