• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Sharon/Michelle special episode (spoilers)
mw0390
03-01-2017
the episode where we find out why Michelle has returned airs on the 12th, Metro says it is a special episode but not technically a 2 hander
sqwidge1978
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by mw0390:
“the episode where we find out why Michelle has returned airs on the 12th, Metro says it is a special episode but not technically a 2 hander”

It clearly state it's a two hander.

In a two handed episode, that all changes when Michelle finally opens up to Sharon about what has happened and what has prompted her to come home without warning after two decades

Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/03/easten...#ixzz4UeoCA5gd
mw0390
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by sqwidge1978:
“It clearly state it's a two hander.

In a two handed episode, that all changes when Michelle finally opens up to Sharon about what has happened and what has prompted her to come home without warning after two decades

Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/03/easten...#ixzz4UeoCA5gd”

the metro article does state that, but i tweeted the writer of the article and i asked is it defo a two hander as the cast list doesnt tally up with it being a two hander and he replied with this

Duncan Lindsay ‏@DuncanLindsay 38m38 minutes ago
@Lad45Mark No, not technically but the focus is fully on the story and the scenes

plus we know Dot is in the episode as well
wallo mr slug
03-01-2017
I have amended the article to make it clearer
EE.Live
03-01-2017
None of the spoilers which DS posted are for Thursday's episode. The cast list is fairly big http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b088nrs8 so I don't think they will just be in the background.

There'll probably just be the odd few scenes with other characters in between the shocks/surprises which Michelle reveals to Sharon.
IanMandy
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by EE.Live:
“None of the spoilers which DS posted are for Thursday's episode. The cast list is fairly big http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b088nrs8 so I don't think they will just be in the background.

There'll probably just be the odd few scenes with other characters in between the shocks/surprises which Michelle reveals to Sharon.”

Will be similar to the Sharon/Ian episode of 2015 then, mainly focusing on them but with the odd scene in between. I wonder why they didn't make that episode or this one a 2 hander
vaslav37
03-01-2017
So it is not a two hander?
EE.Live
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by IanMandy:
“Will be similar to the Sharon/Ian episode of 2015 then, mainly focusing on them but with the odd scene in between. I wonder why they didn't make that episode or this one a 2 hander”

Perhaps they just didn't have enough material to extend it for the whole episode. The Sharon/Ian episode was still really good even though it wasn't a two hander.

Another spoiler for this episode is 'Dot worries about her cat'

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/03/easten...ready-6358432/

Also these spoiler photos may show why there's a long cast list - I think an upset Michelle will leave halfway through the party and the rest of the episode will mainly be just Sharon and Michelle talking.
Adrian_Ward1
03-01-2017
No two hander??
mumbles26
03-01-2017
Forgive me but what's a two hander? ☺️
Hollyoaks14
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by mumbles26:
“Forgive me but what's a two hander? ☺️”

An episode with just two characters
mumbles26
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Hollyoaks14:
“An episode with just two characters”

I feel silly now.

Unless it contains a spectacular storyline and I really do mean spectacular, it sounds as appealing as a shakil monologue episode.
Hollyoaks14
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by mumbles26:
“I feel silly now.

Unless it contains a spectacular storyline and I really do mean spectacular, it sounds as appealing as a shakil monologue episode.”

J-B
03-01-2017
I'm glad it's not a two hander, couldn't take an entire half hour of Sharon's 'acting'.
babyegg
03-01-2017
I hate the 'two handed' episodes, and one between Michelle and Sharon would just be torture. Michelle had to come back with a shedload of baggage though didn't she? It couldn't possibly be just because she fancied a holiday!
The Queen Vic
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by babyegg:
“I hate the 'two handed' episodes, and one between Michelle and Sharon would just be torture. Michelle had to come back with a shedload of baggage though didn't she? It couldn't possibly be just because she fancied a holiday!”

Well, yeah. The character's been off screen for twenty years, she's missed her parents funerals, her brothers funeral and various family occasions including both her brother's weddings... she's obviously back because she needs help or needs the support of her family.

If she had just come back for a holiday, blimey... this forum would've gone nuts! "SOC should be burnt at the stake for recasting Michelle for no reason" - I can imagine it now.
SillyBoyBlue
03-01-2017
Didn't one of the very first two-handers feature Michelle & Sharon, when she told Sharon that Den was Vicky's dad?
alienpanda
04-01-2017
they did a one hander once with just dot talking into a tape recorder....

I wonder if they could better that and be brave enough to try a no hander. Just scenes with no characters in, but things going on.....
Adrian_Ward1
04-01-2017
I still haven't warmed to Michelle
sorcha_healy27
04-01-2017
Originally Posted by mumbles26:
“I feel silly now.

Unless it contains a spectacular storyline and I really do mean spectacular, it sounds as appealing as a shakil monologue episode.”



If he's sexually frustrated an episode involving him alone could technically be classed as a two hander
mumbles26
04-01-2017
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“

If he's sexually frustrated an episode involving him alone could technically be classed as a two hander ”

My morning coffee had suddenly lost it's appeal. 😆😉

Ewww
babyegg
04-01-2017
Originally Posted by The Queen Vic:
“Well, yeah. The character's been off screen for twenty years, she's missed her parents funerals, her brothers funeral and various family occasions including both her brother's weddings... she's obviously back because she needs help or needs the support of her family.

If she had just come back for a holiday, blimey... this forum would've gone nuts! "SOC should be burnt at the stake for recasting Michelle for no reason" - I can imagine it now.”

TheGraduate2012
04-01-2017
Originally Posted by IanMandy:
“Will be similar to the Sharon/Ian episode of 2015 then, mainly focusing on them but with the odd scene in between. I wonder why they didn't make that episode or this one a 2 hander”

And that Kat/Whitney episode a few years ago, which unfortunately featured the Ginger Whinger.
Keyser_Soze1
05-01-2017
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“

If he's sexually frustrated an episode involving him alone could technically be classed as a two hander ”

I often have a nice two hander when Fitney shows off her cleavage.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map