My bet on Leah becoming the soap newest deamon child.
HO Character to be Killed Off in Shock SL SPOILERS
2 of 4
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Another death in Hollyoaks?
”
“Another death in Hollyoaks?
”
The Grim Reaper must be sick of visiting Chester, Hollyoaks
.
Absolutely fuming about this.
This has to be the worst, worst, worst mistake this show has ever made. EVER
I cannot believe it. I thought she said BK rehired her to add some normality back to the show. Why build up her relationship with Ste again. They give us these characters and just insult us and rip them out of the show with half baked death exits. sick of it
This has to be the worst, worst, worst mistake this show has ever made. EVER
I cannot believe it. I thought she said BK rehired her to add some normality back to the show. Why build up her relationship with Ste again. They give us these characters and just insult us and rip them out of the show with half baked death exits. sick of it
Originally Posted by attitude99:
“
They should just call this show Hollycroaks and be done with it.”
“
They should just call this show Hollycroaks and be done with it.”
Lol. Good one
.
Originally Posted by Ownnnn:
“Really not happy about this. Amy, Celine, Jade, Rachel and possibly Esther - they seem to have a vendetta against decent female characters. Meanwhile, there's characters like Diego roaming around with absolutely no purpose.
Anyway, what's the betting they imitate Lucy Beale's death and it turns out to be Leah who kills her? Especially as there were rumours that they originally intended on Leah killing Kathy.”
“Really not happy about this. Amy, Celine, Jade, Rachel and possibly Esther - they seem to have a vendetta against decent female characters. Meanwhile, there's characters like Diego roaming around with absolutely no purpose.
Anyway, what's the betting they imitate Lucy Beale's death and it turns out to be Leah who kills her? Especially as there were rumours that they originally intended on Leah killing Kathy.”
They already had Nico though. If they make 10 year old Leah a serial killer
.
Originally Posted by Rain:
“Absolutely fuming about this.
This has to be the worst, worst, worst mistake this show has ever made. EVER
I cannot believe it. I thought she said BK rehired her to add some normality back to the show. Why build up her relationship with Ste again. They give us these characters and just insult us and rip them out of the show with half baked death exits. sick of it”
“Absolutely fuming about this.
This has to be the worst, worst, worst mistake this show has ever made. EVER
I cannot believe it. I thought she said BK rehired her to add some normality back to the show. Why build up her relationship with Ste again. They give us these characters and just insult us and rip them out of the show with half baked death exits. sick of it”
I agree.
Originally Posted by Anna_W:
“Amy will die. Ste will dump Harry , hug Ryan gay and together raise Leah and Lucas.”
“Amy will die. Ste will dump Harry , hug Ryan gay and together raise Leah and Lucas.”
Urgh. Sounds likely though.
Originally Posted by Rain:
“Absolutely fuming about this.
This has to be the worst, worst, worst mistake this show has ever made. EVER
I cannot believe it. I thought she said BK rehired her to add some normality back to the show. Why build up her relationship with Ste again. They give us these characters and just insult us and rip them out of the show with half baked death exits. sick of it”
“Absolutely fuming about this.
This has to be the worst, worst, worst mistake this show has ever made. EVER
I cannot believe it. I thought she said BK rehired her to add some normality back to the show. Why build up her relationship with Ste again. They give us these characters and just insult us and rip them out of the show with half baked death exits. sick of it”
Excellent post Rain.
The main problem with Amy is that all her stories revolve round Ste and have done for a long time now. But we know that she does work away from Ste, but her death will be a bit part in 'The Ever Increasingly Tiresome Adventures of Ste Hay'.
No doubt the aftermath will focus on how Ste copes, his relationship of Harry, and yet another spiral into drink and drugs again. The kids will be packed off to Mike's, with no reaction from him now losing both of his daughters, and once again the show will revolve round Ste.
I agree Leah is most likely responsible. They've been making her behave worse and worse and, well, with Nico gone there's a vacancy for a child with a hobby of murdering people. Also it was reported a while ago that a storyline had been planned whereby Kathy Barnes would make a temporary return and be killed by Leah for being homophobic towards Ste- but Kathy's actress had a full schedule so they dropped it. Wouldn't be surprised if that has been recycled into this
To think about how brilliant this soap once was, and how ridiculous it is now, genuinely makes me feel sad.
Originally Posted by seventhwave:
“I agree Leah is most likely responsible. They've been making her behave worse and worse and, well, with Nico gone there's a vacancy for a child with a hobby of murdering people. Also it was reported a while ago that a storyline had been planned whereby Kathy Barnes would make a temporary return and be killed by Leah for being homophobic towards Ste- but Kathy's actress had a full schedule so they dropped it. Wouldn't be surprised if that has been recycled into this”
“I agree Leah is most likely responsible. They've been making her behave worse and worse and, well, with Nico gone there's a vacancy for a child with a hobby of murdering people. Also it was reported a while ago that a storyline had been planned whereby Kathy Barnes would make a temporary return and be killed by Leah for being homophobic towards Ste- but Kathy's actress had a full schedule so they dropped it. Wouldn't be surprised if that has been recycled into this”
I agree, and her shoving a cake into Amy's face probably is foreshadowing that. However, it's too soon after Nico, not that it'll stop Kirkwood and his Kronies
I have only watched since July but this show has alot of deaths. Nico I understand. Why Joe Amy and Celine? There was literally no point of killing Celine 
.
.
Originally Posted by Hollyoaks14:
“They already had Nico though. If they make 10 year old Leah a serial killer.”
“They already had Nico though. If they make 10 year old Leah a serial killer
.”
Is Nico really dead? Was her body ever recovered? And where did those ashes come from?
Or have I missed a key episode?
Originally Posted by Luis Essex:
“Is Nico really dead? Was her body ever recovered? And where did those ashes come from?
Or have I missed a key episode?”
“Is Nico really dead? Was her body ever recovered? And where did those ashes come from?
Or have I missed a key episode?”
Not sure if they ever confirmed it
Originally Posted by _elly001:
“To think about how brilliant this soap once was, and how ridiculous it is now, genuinely makes me feel sad.”
“To think about how brilliant this soap once was, and how ridiculous it is now, genuinely makes me feel sad.”
It is, but lots of us were thinking this in 2009 with lawnmower races, Breakfast Club pastiches and a load of dead wood, but it picked up a few years after.
It could get good again, because when it's at its best, it's excellent.
Perhaps there was some truth in the rumour that Leah was going to electrocute her Grandmother in the bath, except they are killing off Amy instead as they couldn't get the actress who played Kathy to return. I wouldn't put anything past that little brat.
Originally Posted by DJ Jimmy:
“It is, but lots of us were thinking this in 2009 with lawnmower races, Breakfast Club pastiches and a load of dead wood, but it picked up a few years after.
It could get good again, because when it's at its best, it's excellent.”
“It is, but lots of us were thinking this in 2009 with lawnmower races, Breakfast Club pastiches and a load of dead wood, but it picked up a few years after.
It could get good again, because when it's at its best, it's excellent.
”
For it to get decent again, Kirkwood needs to leave. The show is always going to be like this wile he is at the helm... the man has completely lost his mind.
Originally Posted by Hollyoaks14:
“I have only watched since July but this show has alot of deaths. Nico I understand. Why Joe Amy and Celine? There was literally no point of killing Celine.”
“I have only watched since July but this show has alot of deaths. Nico I understand. Why Joe Amy and Celine? There was literally no point of killing Celine
.”
Joe because all of Mercedes's partners die in the end
Celine because they wanted to drag out the Cameron nonsense even further and yet another false arrest this time in the shape of Jesse (though he should be arrested for being a criminally bad character
)
Originally Posted by Francy:
“For it to get decent again, Kirkwood needs to leave. The show is always going to be like this wile he is at the helm... the man has completely lost his mind.”
“For it to get decent again, Kirkwood needs to leave. The show is always going to be like this wile he is at the helm... the man has completely lost his mind.”
It's odd though Francy. He was the one who steered the show into what was arguably it's most successful era from late 2006 to early 2009. His return sounded like a great idea!
Where did it all go wrong?
Originally Posted by Hollyoaks14:
“I have only watched since July but this show has alot of deaths. Nico I understand. Why Joe Amy and Celine? There was literally no point of killing Celine.”
“I have only watched since July but this show has alot of deaths. Nico I understand. Why Joe Amy and Celine? There was literally no point of killing Celine
.”
I thought she was a pointless character. She was fodder and her death will be used as a catalyst to Cameron's downfall.
Lindsey Butterfield was the only death in the last year that was satisfying and gave closure to her storyline. Every other death (Patrick was going to die but shouldn't have been murdered by that wooden plank Nico) in 2016 has been a bad decision.
But killing off Lockie, Trevor, Jade and Joe...why?!
But killing off Lockie, Trevor, Jade and Joe...why?!
Originally Posted by DJ Jimmy:
“It's odd though Francy. He was the one who steered the show into what was arguably it's most successful era from late 2006 to early 2009. His return sounded like a great idea!
Where did it all go wrong?”
“It's odd though Francy. He was the one who steered the show into what was arguably it's most successful era from late 2006 to early 2009. His return sounded like a great idea!
Where did it all go wrong?
”
Indeed!! That's why I said he has lost his mind.... he doesn't even look like the same showrunner, his two stints are not compatible. I don't get it. Something must have broken in his head lol (or maybe he wasn't the one really behind the good storytelling of his first stint?? I don't know)
Originally Posted by Francy:
“Indeed!! That's why I said he has lost his mind.... he doesn't even look like the same showrunner, his two stints are not compatible. I don't get it. Something must have broken in his head lol (or maybe he wasn't the one really behind the good storytelling of his first stint?? I don't know)”
“Indeed!! That's why I said he has lost his mind.... he doesn't even look like the same showrunner, his two stints are not compatible. I don't get it. Something must have broken in his head lol (or maybe he wasn't the one really behind the good storytelling of his first stint?? I don't know)”
I think you nailed it there. He got virtually all the credit last time, and all the flak this time. Who's really behind the good times in days gone by and the bad times today?
2 of 4
