• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Eastenders Episode Thread - 03/01/2017 8pm - Babe gets her baps out
<<
<
16 of 17
>>
>
NoughtiesMusic
03-01-2017
Even with DTC gone I can't see SOC shifting the Carters out of the Vic. It's only been 3 years. There's literally no one else I could think of to take over. Would be going round in circles if it went back to the Mitchells.
Dan-Bevis
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by duckylucky:
“I am not sure I could fiorgive my son if he risked his own familys life . His mother was raped in her own home and he then allowed her be burglared and terrified”

This.

As horrible as it is to say, Babe's crimes happened to other people, and I think a family as family-focused as the Carter's would find it easier to forget about such than were it to happen to them.

Linda's rape happened to Linda. Via another family member no less.

And Lee of course deliberately planned a robbery on his family, which he naively thought wouldn't terrify or put any of them in danger - from people he barely knows and who have antagonised him from day 1 [the whole robbery still makes no sense really].

He should in no way be forgiven anytime soon for that.
owen10
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Dan-Bevis:
“This.

As horrible as it is to say, Babe's crimes happened to other people, and I think a family as family-focused as the Carter's would find it easier to forget about such than were it to happen to them.

Linda's rape happened to Linda. Via another family member no less.

And Lee of course deliberately planned a robbery on his family, which he naively thought wouldn't terrify or put any of them in danger - from people he barely knows and who have antagonised him from day 1 [the whole robbery still makes no sense really].

He should in no way be forgiven anytime soon for that.”

But it is alright to forgive a nasty piece of work in Aunt Babe would sell her sister for a few quid. And would gladly get rid of her and put in her a home

Oh and dont forget her blackmailing the Cokers out of thousands when they could have lost their livelihood. And also saying nasty stuff about Paul after he was killed
ea91
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by NoughtiesMusic:
“Even with DTC gone I can't see SOC shifting the Carters out of the Vic. It's only been 3 years. There's literally no one else I could think of to take over. Would be going round in circles if it went back to the Mitchells.”

I wouldn't mind Glenda and Danny taking over to shake things up.
Harris_07
03-01-2017
Do you think Oz would set the police after Mick only for Lee to take the rap and go to jail for his dad?

I don't think it'll happen, but it'd be a nice way to leave the door open for him. I can't see Lee leaving the Square. Surely the family would care for him. Most likely a death in store for Lee.
curvybabes
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Harris_07:
“Do you think Oz would set the police after Mick only for Lee to take the rap and go to jail for his dad?

I don't think it'll happen, but it'd be a nice way to leave the door open for him. I can't see Lee leaving the Square. Surely the family would care for him. Most likely a death in store for Lee.”

I think this will happen.
NoughtiesMusic
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Harris_07:
“Do you think Oz would set the police after Mick only for Lee to take the rap and go to jail for his dad?

I don't think it'll happen, but it'd be a nice way to leave the door open for him. I can't see Lee leaving the Square. Surely the family would care for him. Most likely a death in store for Lee.”

I don't think EE will kill off another character so soon after Ronnie and Roxy. It's not Hollyoaks after all

After Fatboy's death, they waited about six and a half months before the next death. I think it was Margaret Midhurst, Gavin's sister.
cobis
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Harris_07:
“Do you think Oz would set the police after Mick only for Lee to take the rap and go to jail for his dad?

I don't think it'll happen, but it'd be a nice way to leave the door open for him. I can't see Lee leaving the Square. Surely the family would care for him. Most likely a death in store for Lee.”

would Oz want to draw any more attention from the police though? they seem to have got away with the robbery, why would he invite more questions from the police and risk the truth coming out?
xTonix
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by NoughtiesMusic:
“I don't think EE will kill off another character so soon after Ronnie and Roxy. It's not Hollyoaks after all

After Fatboy's death, they waited about six and a half months before the next death. I think it was Margaret Midhurst, Gavin's sister.”

Someone dies in that every week don't they? and there's a fire every other week, not a nice place.
sw2963
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by ea91:
“I wouldn't mind Glenda and Danny taking over to shake things up.”

Yes I agree with this.
soap-lea
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by xTonix:
“Someone dies in that every week don't they? and there's a fire every other week, not a nice place.”

not quite and not quite
c120701
03-01-2017
Do you think the Carters are going to sell Sharon a share of the Vic? SOC seems to want to restore characters to their rightful places - he's put Kathy back in the cafe, so maybe Sharon will be at least a part owner Landlady of the Vic.
owen10
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by c120701:
“Do you think the Carters are going to sell Sharon a share of the Vic? SOC seems to want to restore characters to their rightful places - he's put Kathy back in the cafe, so maybe Sharon will be at least a part owner Landlady of the Vic.”

But Sharon owns the Albert. So she might have to sell that first so she can buy the Vic
Aaron_Silver
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by owen10:
“But Sharon owns the Albert. So she might have to sell that first so she can buy the Vic”

No Vincent owns the Albert, Sharon gave her share to him can't remember the reason
Zarla
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Aaron_Silver:
“No Vincent owns the Albert, Sharon gave her share to him can't remember the reason”

Didn't she need the money to pay Gavin to go away, even though he didn't actually go away?
The_abbott
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by ea91:
“I wouldn't mind Glenda and Danny taking over to shake things up.”

Danny?!

The poor chap can't act which is why his lines have been kept to an absolute minimum.
LHolmes
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Zarla:
“Didn't she need the money to pay Gavin to go away, even though he didn't actually go away?”

That was it. She sold up and gave the money to Gavin yet still expected even more out of Phil when they were getting divorced after a two year marriage from hell.

The money was last seen in a holdall on a balcony at Gavin's mansion. God knows what happened to it after that.
Peg ODwyer
03-01-2017
How much does Lee owe anyhow? I thought it was a couple of thousand pound loans ( twice) so probably less than five thousand, which is not that much money, I don;t think thye need to sell the Vic for five thousand quid.

Michelle is a right cow, who turns up the thermostat when they are a guest in someone elses home???
soap-lea
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by c120701:
“Do you think the Carters are going to sell Sharon a share of the Vic? SOC seems to want to restore characters to their rightful places - he's put Kathy back in the cafe, so maybe Sharon will be at least a part owner Landlady of the Vic.”

so Phil's exes will be landladies along with Linda and Mick as landlord? there's a saying too many chiefs and not enough Indians!

Plus where exactly is the golddigger getting the money from? Bank of Phil is closed now he isn't dying
LHolmes
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Danny?!

The poor chap can't act which is why his lines have been kept to an absolute minimum.”

I'd rather the Carters stayed in there. Mick and Linda are good behind the bar.

But I wouldn't mind Glenda. Danny needs to go again - I can't believe they didn't recast the part.
soap-lea
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Peg ODwyer:
“How much does Lee owe anyhow? I thought it was a couple of thousand pound loans ( twice) so probably less than five thousand, which is not that much money, I don;t think thye need to sell the Vic for five thousand quid.

Michelle is a right cow, who turns up the thermostat when they are a guest in someone elses home???”

yeah but they have other money worries at the moment like Jazz hands not having insurance
Peg ODwyer
03-01-2017
Jazz hands can sell her own pub to pay for her issues.
Dan-Bevis
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by owen10:
“But it is alright to forgive a nasty piece of work in Aunt Babe would sell her sister for a few quid. And would gladly get rid of her and put in her a home

Oh and dont forget her blackmailing the Cokers out of thousands when they could have lost their livelihood. And also saying nasty stuff about Paul after he was killed”

Of course not.
NoughtiesMusic
03-01-2017
Originally Posted by Peg ODwyer:
“How much does Lee owe anyhow? I thought it was a couple of thousand pound loans ( twice) so probably less than five thousand, which is not that much money, I don;t think thye need to sell the Vic for five thousand quid.

Michelle is a right cow, who turns up the thermostat when they are a guest in someone elses home???”

She's just setting herself up for a slap. Stacey has mellowed out a lot from her early days but I wouldn't be surprised if she's provoked further.

Pretty much all the original Slater sisters (except for Little Mo) would've done it already.
junglebungle
03-01-2017
I don't think Mick would of gone and sorted Oz out that quick, and he only had a little bit of blood on his hand and it looked fresh, more likely he punched the wall out of anger.

Michelle is really pissing me off.
<<
<
16 of 17
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map