|
||||||||
Janet Jackson has given birth! |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 296
|
Janet Jackson has given birth!
Janet Jackson has given birth to a baby boy named Eissa Al Mana!
Congratulations.😊 Source: http://people.com/babies/janet-jacks...mes-son-eissa/ |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,501
|
She's likely had some work done, but blimey she looks good for 50.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 581
|
This IS IVF isn't it, as natural conception is surely very, very rare in menopausal women.
''Had some work done''? Of course she has. She's a Jackson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,245
|
Quote:
This IS IVF isn't it, as natural conception is surely very, very rare in menopausal women.
''Had some work done''? Of course she has. She's a Jackson. ![]() Yes, it would seem that IVF is most likely, although I have read numerous gossip sites that seem to be inferring that a surrogate and a fake bump may have been involved. She does look bloody amazing, but "some" work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 18,367
|
Quote:
This IS IVF isn't it, as natural conception is surely very, very rare in menopausal women.
''Had some work done''? Of course she has. She's a Jackson. ![]() Not at all. It's surprisingly common, particularly as women assume their fertility has declined and don't take precautions so the chance of pregnancy is still very much there despite the decline in egg production. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Lanarkshire
Posts: 942
|
Her surrogate has given birth.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,720
|
Quote:
This IS IVF isn't it, as natural conception is surely very, very rare in menopausal women.
''Had some work done''? Of course she has. She's a Jackson. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,310
|
Quote:
Not at all.
It's surprisingly common, particularly as women assume their fertility has declined and don't take precautions so the chance of pregnancy is still very much there despite the decline in egg production. ![]() ![]() Congratulations to JJ on the birth of her baby. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,720
|
Quote:
Not at all.
It's surprisingly common, particularly as women assume their fertility has declined and don't take precautions so the chance of pregnancy is still very much there despite the decline in egg production. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,973
|
Didn't Lowri Turner have triplets at 50?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 18,367
|
Quote:
There were 154 over 50's who gave birth in 2012, that includes all births, not just natural ones. So it's pretty damn rare.
Source? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,729
|
My great-grandmother was born in 1875. She had her 15th and final baby in 1924 - a month after her 49th birthday.
My grandfather was the eldest of the 15. He was 28 when his youngest brother came into the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 18,367
|
Quote:
Apart from the fact that it's the Daily Mail and it's saying that birth rates in the over 50's are actually increasing then, yeah, sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,310
|
Quote:
Didn't Lowri Turner have triplets at 50?
![]() Triplets at 50 eh? Rather her than me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,106
|
Is this her first or (according to rumour) second?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 3,407
|
1st child, in the old days(no tv) women did have children into their 50s, but not a first child.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 581
|
My mum was 43 when she gave birth to my sister, and I was 10.
We say that they were so puritanically minded that they only ever had sex twice - once for my conception and once for hers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,994
|
I don't think she has had a surrogate, in the non airbrushed pap pictures she has put on a lot of weight. She's either genuinely had a baby or else piled on the pounds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 3,407
|
Janet has piled on the pounds before and lost and piled on and lost etc etc etc.
She was the same size a few years back, and being body shamed by the tabs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,875
|
The fake bump trolls are hilarious.
There`s no shame in using a surrogate these days so why would she lie? |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 25,817
|
Was it ever shown to be true that she had a daughter when younger and gave her to an older sister to raise?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,720
|
Quote:
Apart from the fact that it's the Daily Mail and it's saying that birth rates in the over 50's are actually increasing then, yeah, sure.
As for doubting the Daily Mail, the figures come from a parliamentary question. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,720
|
Some different stats here from a different source.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015...n_8647926.html |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:47.




