|
||||||||
Brexit assault on British institutions - first the judges, now the civil service |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pimlico, central London, UK
Posts: 14,872
|
Brexit assault on British institutions - first the judges, now the civil service
We have Farage demanding a large number of sackings in the Foreign Office, with committed Brexiteers brought in to replace them.
We have numerous Brexiteers demanding the new EU ambassador is a committed Brexiteer. This is a complete undermining of the neutrality of the civil service. In the UK we do not appoint civil servants based on their political ideologies. Its very similar to the recent assault on the neutrality of the judicial system by the same people. We have a full blooded campaign now to try and shape the apparatus of the state under one political ideology - with lots of Brexit voters cheering this from the sidelines. I wonder what will be the next target - the BBC should be on high alert. It seems that taking back control actually means handing over all forms of power to the ideology of Brexit. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,658
|
Being rational is a hindrance to implementing brexit because it is such a bad idea. So they are getting towards the point the only people who will do it are extremists.
I don't think it will be much longer until May takes a bout of conscience and resigns. Perhapes this is a sequence of events which will be put in motion when she doesn't trigger A50 in March. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,888
|
Is this due to that guy they showed on the news earlier, the most biased pro-bremain person I have seen in a long time, who was until recently a supposedly completely neutral effective part of the civil (or diplomatic, are they separate?) service and completely happy with dealing with brexit matters because calling it 'muddle-headed' is such a neutral thing to say?
Or is the EU ambassador not meant to be neutral in such things? I thought he was supposed to represent the UK government? So how come he waited six months before spitting out his dummy? Was there a golden pension time-served threshold he had to reach? Or is the book deal now signed or the after-dinner circuit due to start up after the holidays? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
Being rational is a hindrance to implementing brexit because it is such a bad idea. So they are getting towards the point the only people who will do it are extremists.
I don't think it will be much longer until May takes a bout of conscience and resigns. Perhapes this is a sequence of events which will be put in motion when she doesn't trigger A50 in March. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,081
|
Quote:
Is this due to that guy they showed on the news earlier, the most biased pro-bremain person I have seen in a long time, who was until recently a supposedly completely neutral effective part of the civil (or diplomatic, are they separate?) service and completely happy with dealing with brexit matters because calling it 'muddle-headed' is such a neutral thing to say?
Or is the EU ambassador not meant to be neutral in such things? I thought he was supposed to represent the UK government? So how come he waited six months before spitting out his dummy? Was there a golden pension time-served threshold he had to reach? Or is the book deal now signed or the after-dinner circuit due to start up after the holidays? And completely agree with the OP. This drip...drip...drop of undermining the likes of the Judicial system and Civil Service, is both concerning and dangerous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pimlico, central London, UK
Posts: 14,872
|
Quote:
Is this due to that guy they showed on the news earlier, the most biased pro-bremain person I have seen in a long time, who was until recently a supposedly completely neutral effective part of the civil (or diplomatic, are they separate?) service and completely happy with dealing with brexit matters because calling it 'muddle-headed' is such a neutral thing to say?
Or is the EU ambassador not meant to be neutral in such things? I thought he was supposed to represent the UK government? So how come he waited six months before spitting out his dummy? Was there a golden pension time-served threshold he had to reach? Or is the book deal now signed or the after-dinner circuit due to start up after the holidays? Those cheering the current attempted politicising of the civil service and judiciary by Brexiteers should remember that once they are politicised, there is nothing stopping a future left wing or even God forbid an adamant Remainer PM, installing their own choice judges and civil servants in future. It's a very slippery slope. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,433
|
Quote:
Is this due to that guy they showed on the news earlier, the most biased pro-bremain person I have seen in a long time, who was until recently a supposedly completely neutral effective part of the civil (or diplomatic, are they separate?) service and completely happy with dealing with brexit matters because calling it 'muddle-headed' is such a neutral thing to say?
Quote:
So how come he waited six months before spitting out his dummy?
Eh? He hasn't resigned because of the Leave vote in June. It's apparently because of his frustration with a government that won't accept his advice. Nick Clegg has suggested that's he's been “hounded out by hostile Brexiteers in government”.http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7507561.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,312
|
The government have already made it easier to appoint their cronies to 'independent' bodies
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Leafy London
Posts: 20,380
|
It's a very worrying trend indeed. Just wait until the Supreme Court rules.
All this blather about democracy and taking back control - it's nothing of the sort. They are the mantras of the tunnel vision extremists who want everything their way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 35,812
|
Quote:
As ambassador, he was presumably neutral. Now that he's resigned, he doesn't have to be.
Eh? He hasn't resigned because of the Leave vote in June. It's apparently because of his frustration with a government that won't accept his advice. Nick Clegg has suggested that's he's been “hounded out by hostile Brexiteers in government”. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7507561.html It comes with the job. It is the job of civil servants to carry out the wishes of their political masters and make them work, no matter how wrong they think they may be. They can flag up why they think certain measures are wrong, but the final call comes from the government. I know, I was a junior civil servant in the Thatcher years - you can imagine how many decisions made at that time I felt were wrong! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,888
|
Quote:
There is the Home civil service and the Diplomatic service. Both are impartial.
![]() Quote:
This kind of proves my point. You have launched a complete character assignation on him with no evidence behind your claims.
As for evidence just read/watch what he said, I don't need to say anything at all, his own words tell it all.Quote:
Those cheering the current attempted politicising of the civil service and judiciary by Brexiteers should remember that once they are politicised,
They are already heavily politicised, the whole of flipping whitehall was anti-brexit! Or if that's too specific, extremely pro-status-quo which by default is pro-remain.edit : removed ref to date, it's late *this* year that seems to be his end date |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,658
|
Quote:
why exactly is it a bad idea? how is separating the UK from a political union a "bad idea" when it allows the UK government to cater for UK national interests using UK taxpayers money?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 47,995
|
Hmm, me thinks the OP doth protest too much bearing in mind the judges are all still judges and the EU ambassador resigned on his own volition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,481
|
Quote:
Hmm, me thinks the OP doth protest too much bearing in mind the judges are all still judges and the EU ambassador resigned on his own volition.
And the Brexit tactic of smearing the person rather than addressing the argument discredits those those do it more than their targets. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,888
|
Quote:
True.
And the Brexit tactic of smearing the person rather than addressing the argument discredits those those do it more than their targets. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 47,995
|
Quote:
True.
And the Brexit tactic of smearing the person rather than addressing the argument discredits those those do it more than their targets. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,967
|
Quote:
We have Farage demanding a large number of sackings in the Foreign Office, with committed Brexiteers brought in to replace them.
We have numerous Brexiteers demanding the new EU ambassador is a committed Brexiteer. This is a complete undermining of the neutrality of the civil service. In the UK we do not appoint civil servants based on their political ideologies. Its very similar to the recent assault on the neutrality of the judicial system by the same people. We have a full blooded campaign now to try and shape the apparatus of the state under one political ideology - with lots of Brexit voters cheering this from the sidelines. I wonder what will be the next target - the BBC should be on high alert. It seems that taking back control actually means handing over all forms of power to the ideology of Brexit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
I wonder what will be the next target - the BBC should be on high alert.
It seems that taking back control actually means handing over all forms of power to the ideology of Brexit. But now it's clear that he was actually right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,984
|
Quote:
On the other hand, if Mr Ambassador was in some way related to advising on the 'concessions' then he was instrumental in failing to get a convincing deal and can easily be a target for some of the blame as to why we are now facing brexit.
As a Civil Servant he should be neutral, and seen but not heard. By releasing his "opinions" he stepped outside of his neutral role, showed he can't be trusted, and needed to be replaced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
Hmm, me thinks the OP doth protest too much bearing in mind the judges are all still judges and the EU ambassador resigned on his own volition.
If you think that the ambassador truly resigned on his own initiative, you're very naive. When you resign and basically say "the politicians are stubborn idiots" you can be sure that it's a case "go before we push you out" |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,433
|
Quote:
He had a cosy little number, feet under the table with the Eurocrats, and wanted to keep the status quo.
As a Civil Servant he should be neutral, and seen but not heard. By releasing his "opinions" he stepped outside of his neutral role, showed he can't be trusted, and needed to be replaced. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 47,995
|
Quote:
They still got undeserved criticism for doing their jobs. I'm sure that if supreme court judges could be fired for disagreeing with the government, then we'd have seen some of them go too. But (thankfully) at least they have job security.
Quote:
If you think that the ambassador truly resigned on his own initiative, you're very naive. When you resign and basically say "the politicians are stubborn idiots" you can be sure that it's a case "go before we push you out"
He is at liberty to say he jumped before he was pushed but he hasn't so I assume he didn't and he doesn't appear to be a shrinking violet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,967
|
Quote:
Being able to criticise the establishment is part and parcel of a democracy whether you think it is deserving or not is a matter of opinion.
He is at liberty to say he jumped before he was pushed but he hasn't so I assume he didn't and he doesn't appear to be a shrinking violet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Darn Sarf
Posts: 28,728
|
Quote:
Another day another irrational remoan flounce, Zzzzzzz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,636
|
Quote:
Being able to criticise the establishment is part and parcel of a democracy, whether you think it is deserving or not is a matter of opinion.
Sure, criticise the judgment, explain why you think they got it wrong - though it's the supreme court, so it stands. But it's neither here nor there that a judge is "openly gay" or into fencing. Nor are they "traitors" because they made a judgment on how the law is to be interpreted, not a judgment based on what Brexiters want. Quote:
He is at liberty to say he jumped before he was pushed but he hasn't so I assume he didn't and he doesn't appear to be a shrinking violet.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:21.




As for evidence just read/watch what he said, I don't need to say anything at all, his own words tell it all.