|
||||||||
SOC- Is he Axing the Right Characters? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,674
|
SOC- Is he Axing the Right Characters?
SOC has axed Ronnie, Roxy, Belinda, Claudette, Babe, Lee and possibly Cora, but his he axing the right characters?
There are characters like Tina, Sylvie, Shakil and even Johnny who are crying out to be axed, why have these characters not been axed? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 738
|
Filler type characters have always and always will exist in a show like EastEnders.
Denise is one character that is an absolute lost cause that I think should be written out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,974
|
Axing Tina etc would make absolutely no difference to the show, unlike the others you mentioned. Les and Pam leaving allowed Billy and Honey to move up in the world and become more prominent on the show. IMO they've earned that after years on the back burner. R&R going makes room for the young adult Mitchells coming along. Ben and Jay have been getting far more airtime. Belinda and Kyle leaving have made way for Michelle, and perhaps Mark.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,562
|
Kyle is the only axing i understand, maybe Les and Pam at a push. Otherwise his axing's have been completely baffling and we are left with the dullest most uninspiring cast ever. In my
opinion |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,123
|
Don't agree at all with killing off Ronnie. Roxy I'm less bothered about (should've gone with the alternative ending).
Lee's storyline so far has been strong. Not sure I'd have axed him when there's at least 2 other Carters who aren't worth keeping around, but maybe a departure could make this as dramatic as it is (with impact). He shouldn't have axed Belinda at all, that was a mistake. There was literally no reason to write her out. The Slater presence is already lacking, really thought SOC would've kept her seeing as how he worked on Slater sl's in the past. Claudette and Babe can always come back as long as their families are around and it was suggested in the articles about them. Claudette was ruined by the stupid gangster stuff earlier. It seems like Babe's exit may tie in with the current financial problems of her family. Maybe Mick will boot her out if he gets a whiff of blackmail. Axing Kyle was a good decision. Started off well but ended up a complete bore. With the Cokers, their exit was well written and he made them centre of those episodes. With Billy managing the funeral parlour there's always a chance they'll make guest appearances in the future. Shakil, Tina, Johnny, even Carmel or Whitney are names I'd have considered rather than R&R and Belinda. Shaky getting the chop would've spared us this terrible storyline with Bex. Tina is filler, Nu Johnny is not interesting at all (DTC should've never recasted him), Carmel has deteriorated as a character and Whitney just bores me now. Really thought she could've been the next Stacey a while back, but the writing never elevated her to that level. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,915
|
Pam & Les - great characters, really fell in love with them, didn't want them to leave, but totally understood why they did. The story felt really truthful and right, even though I was sad for them to leave.
Kyle - brought absolutely nothing to the show. Wasn't played by a very good actor. I respect and admire the fact that the show brought in a transgender actor, but the character was so uninteresting. Perhaps they could have delved further into him being transgender, but then if that's the only reason the character's in the show then why do it? The whole point is surely to show that the gender of a character isn't important, but without the transgender issue - and this may sound un-PC (it's not meant to be) - actually he was very boring. Lee - always has been my least favourite Carter. Don't rate Danny-Boy Hatchard much at all, think he's actually quite a bad actor. Been good these past few weeks, felt a bit sorry for Lee actually, but I think it's time for him to go definitely. Claudette - bit disappointed with this one. Loved Ellen Thomas, but it seems the Hubbards aren't really in his game plan. Perhaps I'm wrong. Still, potential to return. Babe - I really like Babe but she is always scheming isn't she? I just see her as a bitter old hag through and through. Time for a rest, I think. But I'd love to see her back. Belinda - I was shocked. Felt like she could have become a really important character. Miss her. Ronnie and Roxy - agree with resting them, they needed to be. But killing them? I'm unsure. Perhaps it'll prove to be the worst decision, perhaps not. Time will tell. I can't slag off the decision now because it's giving good drama at the moment. I'm more gutted they killed Ronnie really. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,357
|
He didn't axe Cora, she was never in contract and left a year before he came on board
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,674
|
He has axed more women than man it seems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
He has axed more women than man it seems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mawdsley Street, Weatherfield
Posts: 8,633
|
Nobody is happy either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,674
|
He does seem to be finished with his axings, although there are rumours Jack is leaving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,674
|
Quote:
He didn't axe Cora, she was never in contract and left a year before he came on board
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
Nobody is happy either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
DTC must have axed her then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,357
|
Quote:
DTC must have axed her then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,503
|
Les and Pam - Absolutley not. They had plenty of life in them and were amoung my favorites. They proved themselves when given storylines and were the best in the community scenes and felt like a real part of Walford. Their exit was beautiful but was wasn't the time.
Belinda - No. great character who was starting to get involved and justs ups and leaves in a bizzare exit. She should have stayed for longer. Kyle - absolutley not. He was underused and had alot of potential. I would have liked to seen him get love interest and explore the struggle they get finding their someone. I thibk he needed another year but with storylines rather than completly neglected like he had been since he moved to the square. Claudette - This one is a bit tricky. Yes in the sense no one liked her in Walford and her awful backstory that she murdered Henry and sent Fatboy to die she had to go. But at the same time, no. She was suppposed to help the arrival of various characters she fostered over the years and tbh I would have liked to have seen this. We have seen 4 although 1 was a cameo character but I'd have liked to have gotten to meet them and see their bond over a few years. Babe - Yes. As much as I love Babe, I can't see her realistically staying in Walford as another of her evii schemes is revealed. She needs a break away from the square for a while. Ronnie - Yes and she had to die. However her exit story was stupid. She should have foubd out about Fatboy and had her murderous past catch up as revenge got taken. Not drowning in some random accident. Roxy: No. tbh I'd love to see Roxy cope with Ronnie's death. Also with Ronnie dead she can break free and grow into her own character. Ronnie always controlled her and brought her down. Also she is the neglected Mitchell sisted. Lee: No. The robbery story is stupid and Lee having a part doesnt sit right with me. Also Lee has proven himself as a character these last few weeks especially in the suicide attempt episode. Plus with Linda away already, it's really not the time. So thags just Babe and Ronnie I fully agree with. He should have axed Billy, Sharon or Phil, Kim, Dot, Mick and Whitney |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,609
|
Quote:
He does seem to be finished with his axings, although there are rumours Jack is leaving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,398
|
I wish that one day a producer has the balls to axe Phil. He has been on show for so many years and has had all of the possible storylines thrown at him. For me, he doesn't bring anything to the show. He's boring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,974
|
Quote:
He has axed more women than man it seems.
DTC did like his older ladies and did bring a lot in...Claudette, Babe, Sylvie, Carmel, Pam and Kathy. Then the guests..Peggy, Margaret and Sal. I hope we keep Derek as a friend for Patrick. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 121
|
I would say no. He's axing the wrong characters. Granted, Ronnie and a Roxy needed a rest, but they should have just left in that red convertible and drove off into the sunset for a few years. As for Babe, I think she hasn't potential to be a great matriarch, as recent episodes have shown plus she has that dark side that makes it interesting. Also with Lee, in the beginning I agreed with his axing but recent episodes, like his suicide attempt really made him shine I think and it would be great to see what he is capable of.
Was Claudette one of SOCs axings? As I remember reading somewhere that she will be back in 8-9 months? But anyway, we have seen those characters get axed while characters such as Carmel, Shakil, nuMartin, Jack (who has been annoying me there past few months), and Derek are still there. I would also add nuMichelle to that list as she is irritating as hell but I'm willing to give her a chance as she is new. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
There was a run of men leaving...Andy, Gavin, Buster, Tam, Masood, Kyle and Les. I don't know who got shot of them though.
DTC did like his older ladies and did bring a lot in...Claudette, Babe, Sylvie, Carmel, Pam and Kathy. Then the guests..Peggy, Margaret and Sal. I hope we keep Derek as a friend for Patrick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,674
|
Quote:
There was a run of men leaving...Andy, Gavin, Buster, Tam, Masood, Kyle and Les. I don't know who got shot of them though.
DTC did like his older ladies and did bring a lot in...Claudette, Babe, Sylvie, Carmel, Pam and Kathy. Then the guests..Peggy, Margaret and Sal. I hope we keep Derek as a friend for Patrick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,674
|
Quote:
There was a run of men leaving...Andy, Gavin, Buster, Tam, Masood, Kyle and Les. I don't know who got shot of them though.
DTC did like his older ladies and did bring a lot in...Claudette, Babe, Sylvie, Carmel, Pam and Kathy. Then the guests..Peggy, Margaret and Sal. I hope we keep Derek as a friend for Patrick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,471
|
Jack is not leaving
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,172
|
Quote:
SOC has axed Ronnie, Roxy, Belinda, Claudette, Babe, Lee and possibly Cora, but his he axing the right characters?
There are characters like Tina, Sylvie, Shakil and even Johnny who are crying out to be axed, why have these characters not been axed? Roxy, Lee and Cora I am not at all bothered about and wont miss at all |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:39.



