|
||||||||
Why isn't Freesat HD on all TV's? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Wales
Posts: 2,165
|
Why isn't Freesat HD on all TV's?
As per title really
Why isn't Freesat HD on all TV's? Who pays for it as Sony have satellite but not Freesat? I know it's on most/all Samsung & Panasonic TV's, I think LG too. If it were cheap to license the software and cheap to add to the TV would it not be as widespread if not even more than FreeView. More channels? wider availability? better picture? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,287
|
Quote:
As per title really
Why isn't Freesat HD on all TV's? Who pays for it as Sony have satellite but not Freesat? I know it's on most/all Samsung & Panasonic TV's, I think LG too. If it were cheap to license the software and cheap to add to the TV would it not be as widespread if not even more than FreeView. More channels? wider availability? better picture? Freesat does not give you more channels, nor wider availability or a better picture. Freesat is just a epg for some of the free to air channels from 28.2E. TV's with free to air DVB-S2 tuners can access any such channels from any satellite you can point a dish at (They can usually work with a motorised dish that can give you thousands of channels). When used to view a channel that happens to be on the Freesat epg the picture quality is the same (It's the same transmission) With a Sky dish a Freesat TV will give you about 210 channels, a generic FTA DVB-S2 also receiving from 28.2E about 497 channels (many regional variations you don't see on a Freesat box). http://en.kingofsat.net/freqs.php?&p...q&filtre=Clear Current Freesat capable TV's http://www.freesat.co.uk/get-freesat/all-tvs |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,425
|
Quote:
Why isn't Freesat HD on all TV's?
Quote:
Who pays for it as Sony have satellite but not Freesat?
Quote:
If it were cheap to license the software and cheap to add to the TV would it not be as widespread if not even more than FreeView.
Most people with a sat dish will either have Sky, or previously have had Sky. Not many will install a dish specifically for Freesat if they already have Freeview available, despite the benefits of a wider choice and better picture quality on many channels. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,774
|
Quote:
Why isn't Freesat HD on all TV's? Obviously adding satellite adds considerably to the manufacturing costs, but FTA sets can be used all over Europe where Freesat can't be - plus there are probably licensing costs as well. Most of the Freesat TV's we've stocked have ended up been sold off cheap as normal Freeview models - which was a great shame. The people who I see who have got Freesat TV's used as they should be are VERY happy with them though. Obviously Panasonic have the advantage that they make UK specific models, so there are no concerns about them not working outside the UK - presumably LG and Samsung do the same for their Freesat models?, certainly Sony did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Posts: 17,287
|
Quote:
Because there's very little demand for it, with most Freesat TV's never seeing a satellite signal in their life.
Obviously adding satellite adds considerably to the manufacturing costs, but FTA sets can be used all over Europe where Freesat can't be - plus there are probably licensing costs as well. Most of the Freesat TV's we've stocked have ended up been sold off cheap as normal Freeview models - which was a great shame. The people who I see who have got Freesat TV's used as they should be are VERY happy with them though. Obviously Panasonic have the advantage that they make UK specific models, so there are no concerns about them not working outside the UK - presumably LG and Samsung do the same for their Freesat models?, certainly Sony did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,051
|
Haven't we moved on from a decade ago? Whilst nowhere near ALL and of course some can't but don't the vast majority of houses have a satellite dish? They are everywhere on nearly every house.
Satellite TV is hardly the novelty it was 10 years or more ago. In fact for those of us in Freeview areas where we don't and probably won't ever be getting the latest HD coms added, then satellite TV is the way to go and a must have. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,031
|
Quote:
Haven't we moved on from a decade ago? Whilst nowhere near ALL and of course some can't but don't the vast majority of houses have a satellite dish? They are everywhere on nearly every house.
Satellite TV is hardly the novelty it was 10 years or more ago. In fact for those of us in Freeview areas where we don't and probably won't ever be getting the latest HD coms added, then satellite TV is the way to go and a must have. Indeed that is my experience. Most of this area only gets the freeview lite service (3 multiplexes only). The majority of homes have a dish. Actually, the take up of satellite tv was in full swing some years ago - people began choosing sky (no freesat back then) when analogue ch5 started (it wasn't available here via an aerial), and in the early days of digital tv - the OnDifital/ItvDigital era when that service was plagued by a very restricted service area (we had no chance of getting that - and most of the area had no chance), and finally if you wanted 16x9 widescreen pictures you had to go digital - which for the other reasons meant going with sky. And that's before u factor in things like football & film channels. |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:30.


