|
||||||||
EE why so.much Hate towards it atm |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 15,115
|
Quote:
It's definitely on the up.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,916
|
Quote:
They were making it up. Bobby wasn't the original killer, it was supposed to be Jane but it got changed fairly late on. In fact, wasn't Bobby the third choice? Hadn't they considered Cindy as well? I can't remember. But yes, everything was finely planned until the live week and after that it almost seemed a case of "didn't we do well, what a shocker, aren't we brilliant for making it Bobby, now what else can we get away with, this is gonna be so much fun..."
Everything from then on started becoming more like fan fiction with Gavin, Kathy, Claudette and all the rewriting of history etc |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,764
|
I don't hate it but it's incredibly dull. This is not helped by the fact everything is happening off screen. Even Roxy's death was offscreen!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,939
|
Quote:
Really? So far the only fall out from their big festive storyline is Jack announcing he's still going to Ongar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
I don't hate it but it's incredibly dull. This is not helped by the fact everything is happening off screen. Even Roxy's death was offscreen!
I am pretty annoyed and angry at the whole R&R thing, I thought they needed a rest, but now i do not even think they need that! I think the writers were really onto something with Roxy's drug problem and that could have continued onwards. People keep saying to give the producer time, but how much time? And I was just on Facebook and the EastEnders page posted a picture of that Shakik. I presume he's featuring heavily tonight then with that awful Bex storyline. Think i will give that one a miss! ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: here
Posts: 4,803
|
Quote:
Really? So far the only fall out from their big festive storyline is Jack announcing he's still going to Ongar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,764
|
Quote:
I have the same sort of feelings, I don't hate it, but it just seems so hollow and lifeless, almost like its on a slow road to nowhere!
I am pretty annoyed and angry at the whole R&R thing, I thought they needed a rest, but now i do not even think they need that! I think the writers were really onto something with Roxy's drug problem and that could have continued onwards. People keep saying to give the producer time, but how much time? And I was just on Facebook and the EastEnders page posted a picture of that Shakik. I presume he's featuring heavily tonight then with that awful Bex storyline. Think i will give that one a miss! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() My issue with the Mitchell Sisters is that together they just kept going round in circles. I was bored with it years ago. Roxy had already had a chance to exist without her sister for 2 years and still didn't amount to much. I do think it was time to draw a line under the sister act but Ronnie should have been spared. She was always much more interesting and could stand on her own unlike Roxy. Right now, although their exit episode was good, the aftermath has been poor and makes it seem not worthwhile to have bothered doing it. The show is just so flat that even the deaths of two characters can't energise it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:43.



Everything from then on started becoming more like fan fiction with Gavin, Kathy, Claudette and all the rewriting of history etc
