|
||||||||
HO: Leela and Louis? Really? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,295
|
HO: Leela and Louis? Really?
I'm trying to get my head around that because I cannot even think of how in the hell this would work. When and why? I'm trying to get my head around it. Those two? And they conceived a baby. Can somebody please explain to me HOW they got together? I can't even think of how it happened. I obviously know WHAT happened to create a baby, but how did they end up together?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 16,459
|
Lol what? Louis is the father of Leela's baby? Wow... and there was me thinking this show couldn't get any more stupid.
How random is that? It's like Kirkwood picks these names out of a raffle. Leela and Louis have barely had any meaningful interactions onscreen, if at all... how can they expect the viewers to even care about this? I'm sorry but that's just out of character for Leela to cheat out of the blue with some random married bloke with kids, who is older enough to be her dad and doesn't have a lot going for him at all. Louis is possibly the most boring man in England - why him? Leela just doesn't strike me as the type to jump into bed with any old man, especially a family man. Her tomboy sensibilities and strong sense of responsibility have always made her stand out from most of the typical girls on Hollyoaks. Just a shame really that they've taken the character down this messy route now, I thought Jessie would be the father but I guess that was too obvious. They had to go for someone completely out of left-field in order to try and shock the viewers with a cheap twist. It just smells of hack writing, I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 354
|
Quote:
Lol what? Louis is the father of Leela's baby? Wow... and there was me thinking this show couldn't get any more stupid.
How random is that? It's like Kirkwood picks these names out of a raffle. Leela and Louis have barely had any meaningful interactions onscreen, if at all... how can they expect the viewers to even care about this? I'm sorry but that's just out of character for Leela to cheat out of the blue with some random married bloke with kids, who is older enough to be her dad and doesn't have a lot going for him at all. Louis is possibly the most boring man in England - why him? Leela just doesn't strike me as the type to jump into bed with any old man, especially a family man. Her tomboy sensibilities and strong sense of responsibility have always made her stand out from most of the typical girls on Hollyoaks. Just a shame really that they've taken the character down this messy route now, I thought Jessie would be the father but I guess that was too obvious. They had to go for someone completely out of left-field in order to try and shock the viewers with a cheap twist. It just smells of hack writing, I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 980
|
It's typical Kirkwood. He has to try and create twists whether they are needed or not. He treats the viewers like simpletons that can only watch shows where there are murders, explosions or stunts and cannot handle long term storylines where the quality of acting is the talking point.
He completely alters and ruins characters for the sake of creating "exciting twists" such as making Lindsey a killer. He has no attention span so makes sure that there are short term stunts (with absoutely no aftermath) because he himself gets bored easy so just adds twists on top of twists because he treats the viewers like idiots. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:46.

