Yes!

All this talk of Lenny, Benny, Penny and Kenny - no-one thought of a Jenny!

was some the metaphysical imagery particularly effective?

Marco's first article is TOTAL SELF SERVING BOLLOCKS-he's just trying to justify his behaviour in the house."Deary me I was labelled by endemol"

No you wern't you behaved like an idiotic drama queen and people saw you for the way you behaved.If you had another side you should have shown it instead of "hiding it away".
Of course different personalities are chosen and thrown in.How they BEHAVE is how they will be shown-what can the editors show?something that doesn't happen?
What a brutally disappointing first article-if it's all pre-determined what is the point of it all.The guy doesn't have a clue and is just writing on a preset justification of himself.BORING.(where the ****s Dean)

I did, post 64

Well Marco's first column. I read it - breaking my first rule - but I won't criticise the writer - my second rule.

A well put-together piece of writing. It confirms a certain view of the producers - it would be interesting to know if their stereo-typing was as blatant in BB4 or whether it was a reaction to the perceived failures of that series. We know its happened this year - Tina Harvey had already told us.

A point not taken up is that the auditions and the screening process aren't held for nothing. The HMs are selected because they have the potential to be interesting characters - their stereotypes are not from out of the ether they are merely expanded versions of their own traits and image. But a HM retains free will in the house - you can be that larger version of yourself or you can 'ham it up' or you can choose not to play the producers game. We can all name HMs last year for each category I suspect.

Anyway - definitely a worthwhile column.

Jenny Eclair - I think you folks have got it by george!

Ooops ... sorry ...

I narrowed it down to 4,

Penny Ellis
Jenny Eclair
Benny Hill
Lenny from the Simpsons

I have a feeling it might be Penny.

Jonny?

Jonny has no 'e' in it - thank god.

"I've updated me column on here three f**kin times this week!!!"

Oh please let it be her! I think she's FAB. And she has great taste in HMs too if memory serves me correctly.


Hang on...........isn't one of the BBLB 'experts' called Jenny.....something?

My thoughts were;

Jenny Eclair (BBC Comedy)
Jenni Falconer (GMTV)
Jenni Murray (Women's Hour)
Jenni Bond (Wasn't she in some reality thing?)

I'm trying to think of all the commentators who have been on the BB shows.

Jenny James, is it? Body-language 'expert' or somesuch? Can't see her doing it, though.

*polishes 'forum smart-arse' badge*

I was hoping for Lenny from the Simpsons

I thought it was Jenny Eclair that you really wanted though, Electra?

Who is Jenni Trent-Hughes??

Could be a lot worse. She is the only one of the 'experts' that I like.

Jenny Trent-Hughes. BBLB pundit. Said that Stu would run a mile (away from Michelle) when he got out of the House.

Is that expert enough?

She's fun, though. A good choice.

I would have loved it if it was her. I posted that then remembered Jenni wossface.

What a superb choice, Jenni Trent-Hughes is great. One of my favourite regular BBLB pundits. She's funny, insightful and most importantly, as much of a BB obsessive as any of us.

Well done DS, I'm really looking forward to her column.

Are you mad , that women dosen't know f*** all

No. I like her.

Well done Electra


Cxx

I think Jenni Trent Hughes is a great choice. She is one of the more memorable pundits on BBLB. Can't wait to start reading her column, although I don't always agree with her its good to have differing views to your own.