A woman trapped in a man's body. Every bisexual's fantasy, surely!
"Science" - bisexuals are "confused" apparently - JERK
3 of 8
Originally Posted by cazkins:
“
Being bisexual is not an excuse for poor taste though! 
”
“
Being bisexual is not an excuse for poor taste though! ”
That's well mean! I'm attracted to them anyways
Originally Posted by BigBrother.:
“That's well mean! I'm attracted to them anyways”
“That's well mean! I'm attracted to them anyways
”
Ah well, each to his (or her) own. Personally I prefer my sexual partners to have more than a time share in a braincell.
Originally Posted by BigBrother.:
“lol if you say so cazkins. What's your sexuality again?”
“lol if you say so cazkins. What's your sexuality again?”
Undefined!
Originally Posted by Father Jack:
“Sorry to go on, there was so much wrong with that article it's hard to know where to stop!
Basically the closest thing to 'no sexuality' in humans is not being attracted to ANYONE.
Bisexuality is the next nearest.”
“Sorry to go on, there was so much wrong with that article it's hard to know where to stop!
Basically the closest thing to 'no sexuality' in humans is not being attracted to ANYONE.
Bisexuality is the next nearest.”
Have to agree with you actually. There are lots of things wrong with that article (for a start it seems to confuse homo- and bi-sexuality), and don't worry about going on - to a straight person such as yourself (i'm assuming) it must be a little annoying to be told that your sexual orientation is a social construct and that you're really something else - the same way it's offensive for bisexuals to be told they're either straight or gay. So yep, that blows my little theory apart!
Originally Posted by homer911:
“i did not get the feeling that he was trying to be Prejudice with the comment at all.”
“i did not get the feeling that he was trying to be Prejudice with the comment at all.”
I think that unintentional prejudice is the worse kind.
Originally Posted by BigBrother.:
“mysterious What's your gender then? 
”
“mysterious
What's your gender then? ”
Female. But I don't use labels.
Originally Posted by cazkins:
“I think that unintentional prejudice is the worse kind.”
“I think that unintentional prejudice is the worse kind.”
i don't think it was prejudice just a bit of a naive comment its not like he said i don't like bi-sexual people for what ever reason.
Originally Posted by Lyris:
“Have to agree with you actually. There are lots of things wrong with that article (for a start it seems to confuse homo- and bi-sexuality), and don't worry about going on - to a straight person such as yourself (i'm assuming) it must be a little annoying to be told that your sexual orientation is a social construct and that you're really something else - the same way it's offensive for bisexuals to be told they're either straight or gay. So yep, that blows my little theory apart!”
“Have to agree with you actually. There are lots of things wrong with that article (for a start it seems to confuse homo- and bi-sexuality), and don't worry about going on - to a straight person such as yourself (i'm assuming) it must be a little annoying to be told that your sexual orientation is a social construct and that you're really something else - the same way it's offensive for bisexuals to be told they're either straight or gay. So yep, that blows my little theory apart!
”
I am straight yes, and I am also painfully aware that sexuality and what is 'sexual' is a social construct - as a straight man it is very difficult for me to express love (non physical) for another man without it being frowned upon- which is why straight men can seem (to gay persons) rather repressed - it's cos we are!
Physically I only have eyes for the ladies, but that shouldn't mean I should not be allowed to express love for another man, yet society deems certain behaviour as 'sexual' and does not like it: notice the difference in English/Italian culture where men can kiss other men in one but not the other without raising eyebrows.
Er, I'm not sure what I'm being told that I am.
Originally Posted by homer911:
“i don't think it was prejudice just a bit of a naive comment its not like he said i don't like bi-sexual people for what ever reason.”
“i don't think it was prejudice just a bit of a naive comment its not like he said i don't like bi-sexual people for what ever reason.”
I think it's showing prejudice because it's offering an explanation, an excuse if you like, for bisexuality. If you are totally accepting of people's "choices" you don't need to offer an explanation or excuse for them.
IN school they cant teach you about sexuality, one of my teachers told me. I think thats bad cos how else will you learn? also it could make people confused about whats 'normal'. I think schools should teach about sexuality in sex ed.
Originally Posted by Father Jack:
“
Er, I'm not sure what I'm being told that I am.”
“
Er, I'm not sure what I'm being told that I am.”
I think you are the original FJ and if I'm right, I'm very pleased to see you!
Originally Posted by KatKatrinaKat:
“ I think schools should teach about sexuality in sex ed.”
“ I think schools should teach about sexuality in sex ed.”
absobloodylutely!
Originally Posted by cazkins:
“I think it's showing prejudice because it's offering an explanation, an excuse if you like, for bisexuality. If you are totally accepting of people's "choices" you don't need to offer an explanation or excuse for them.”
“I think it's showing prejudice because it's offering an explanation, an excuse if you like, for bisexuality. If you are totally accepting of people's "choices" you don't need to offer an explanation or excuse for them.”
it was maybe wrong to make a comment about something he did not understand but to say it had malicious intent is wrong in my opinion.
Originally Posted by KatKatrinaKat:
“IN school they cant teach you about sexuality, one of my teachers told me. I think thats bad cos how else will you learn? also it could make people confused about whats 'normal'. I think schools should teach about sexuality in sex ed.”
“IN school they cant teach you about sexuality, one of my teachers told me. I think thats bad cos how else will you learn? also it could make people confused about whats 'normal'. I think schools should teach about sexuality in sex ed.”
I think they can nowadays? I'm not sure. Didn't they ditch that Section 28?
Originally Posted by homer911:
“it was maybe wrong to make a comment about something he did not understand but to say it had malicious intent is wrong in my opinion.”
“it was maybe wrong to make a comment about something he did not understand but to say it had malicious intent is wrong in my opinion.”
I didn't say he had malicous intent. But I will say I think he's ignorant.
Originally Posted by KatKatrinaKat:
“IN school they cant teach you about sexuality, one of my teachers told me. I think thats bad cos how else will you learn? also it could make people confused about whats 'normal'. I think schools should teach about sexuality in sex ed.”
“IN school they cant teach you about sexuality, one of my teachers told me. I think thats bad cos how else will you learn? also it could make people confused about whats 'normal'. I think schools should teach about sexuality in sex ed.”
Er, if they're not teaching you about Sex in sex ed, what ARE they teaching you?
And when your teachers say they 'cant' teach you, what did they mean??
Originally Posted by homer911:
“it was maybe wrong to make a comment about something he did not understand but to say it had malicious intent is wrong in my opinion.”
“it was maybe wrong to make a comment about something he did not understand but to say it had malicious intent is wrong in my opinion.”
Agreed, it was ignorant but not necessarily hurtful (on purpose).
3 of 8
