Originally Posted by without_reason:
“"Bullying (verb): use superior strength or influence to intimidate (someone), typically to force him or her to do what one wants"
It could be argued that the entire premise of big brother is to put a group of people into a position where they are being bullied - ie. BB manipulates the group through its superior knowledge of the situation, through having power over them (rewards,evictions ,environment, etc.).
However they *choose* to be placed in this position and see if they come out on top.
So given this basic premise is there a line BB should not cross (physical abuse? psychological abuse?) or is all fair within the rules of broadcasting?”
Oooh good question. I think with me its about "fairness". I know its an "unfair" situation, and I know the whole premise of BB is to manipulate the HMs using the power that the HMs give to BB. However, in the past BB has always taken a stance where everyone is dealt with reasonably "fairly" and its just a matter of who within a group can come out best given the same set of circumstances. However, for me this year, this picking on one individual is a step too far, in that its about BB treating one of the differently (and not in a nice way) to try and manipulate the outcome.
I take everyone's point with regard to how Makosi should handle this - but she doesn't seem to be able to think of that. And that is what bullying is about. Usually if you stand up to a bully they will go away. If you don't then it will just get worse for you - so is it therefore your fault that you are bullied? Is it Makosi's fault because she can't seem to think of a way out of this?