DS Forums

 
 

Is 5/6 better than 1/1, I don't get it, help!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2005, 13:53
chapp21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by dawson
Yes that's the theory. The bookies are suggesting that as Mary is more likely to go at present, they will pay out less.

But sometimes the bookies, like everyone, make mistakes.
In the CBB3 final, Kenzie was something like 1/10 favourite to win, whilst Bez was more like 5/1. ess oBez won.
Also the bookies will change the odds if lots of money goes on one person, regardless of how they are fairing on polls. If i had say £50,000 and put the money on Mary to win at 22/1. The bookies would reduce Mary's odds to say 10/1 because they would have too big a liability to pay out incase she won. They would change the odds and make sure no onegets the chance to put money on that outcome at that price.
chapp21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 03-06-2005, 13:56
Father Jack
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Exeter
Posts: 4,063
Also, you need to remember that odds are NOT a measure of probability: they are a measure of how happy the bookies are to pay money back for an event happening. Or, its a measure of the RISK that bookies are prepared to take with their money.

Say for instance there was a *measurable* probability of X happening of 50%.

Now if you were a bookie you would want to REDUCE the RISK of losing (bookies ALWAYS win in the long term), so you would set the odds at a figure that meant that if YOU DID LOSE, the loss would not exceed your income (in theory) - so , if you established a 50% chance of X, you would set the odds at 2/1 (or lower) AGAINST, rather than say 4/1. (becuase you'd have a net LOSS of £4 for every £1 bet recieved, if you were the bookie).

However, in most cases, the probability of X is *not* measurable so the bookies are estimating - which is where they can make mistakes.

Just as well or punters would never win: it is only because the odds are a *guess* that we punters win: if the probabilty was measurable, the bookies would just set he odds at the exact probability.
Father Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 13:58
dawson
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by jacko12
yeah but for the bookies to change the odds the way they are they must have received some info as they way the odds have changed is unusual especially in a two horse race...
Bookies will often modify the odds based on the money they receive for a certain bet(plus other factors)

So, for example, if they were not receiving money for craig to go at 4/6, then they might lengthen the odds to 1/1 to attract more money.

Remember: people betting does not reflect the same people as those voting. You must be 18 or over to bet. There is no age restriction to voting on BB.

EDIT: as chapp21 has already suggested
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 13:59
scaryspice
Banned User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 1,549
Its no wonder I dont go to the bookies, this is majorly confusing!
scaryspice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:01
JamieF
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 143
Originally Posted by Father Jack
Also, you need to remember that odds are NOT a measure of probability: they are a measure of how happy the bookies are to pay money back for an event happening. Or, its a measure of the RISK that bookies are prepared to take with their money.

Say for instance there was a *measurable* probability of X happening of 50%.

Now if you were a bookie you would want to REDUCE the RISK of losing (bookies ALWAYS win in the long term), so you would set the odds at a figure that meant that if YOU DID LOSE, the loss would not exceed your income (in theory) - so , if you established a 50% chance of X, you would set the odds at 2/1 (or lower) AGAINST, rather than say 4/1. (becuase you'd have a net LOSS of £4 for every £1 bet recieved, if you were the bookie).

However, in most cases, the probability of X is *not* measurable so the bookies are estimating - which is where they can make mistakes.

Just as well or punters would never win: it is only because the odds are a *guess* that we punters win: if the probabilty was measurable, the bookies would just set he odds at the exact probability.
What if its written in ink (IE the grand national in the paper) could they still change the odds so that they wouldn't lose TOO badly?? (the bookies)
JamieF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:01
chapp21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by scaryspice
Its no wonder I dont go to the bookies, this is majorly confusing!
It is confusing if you're not use to it. So you will not be on your own Scary. People have to remember it is not a science and there are many factors that come in to consideration when compiling odds.
chapp21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:05
Eagle9a
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 18,770
Originally Posted by chapp21
It is confusing if you're not use to it. So you will not be on your own Scary. People have to remember it is not a science and there are many factors that come in to consideration when compiling odds.
Of course if you know the result in advance then the odds dont matter. Hence the useful inside info provided by one or two people on this site
Eagle9a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:05
earnie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 702
The safest way around it is to keep hold of your money.
I have occasionaly learnt the hard way in the past.
earnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:06
jacko12
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,862
Originally Posted by dawson
Bookies will often modify the odds based on the money they receive for a certain bet(plus other factors)

So, for example, if they were not receiving money for craig to go at 4/6, then they might lengthen the odds to 1/1 to attract more money.

Remember: people betting does not reflect the same people as those voting. You must be 18 or over to bet. There is no age restriction to voting on BB.

EDIT: as chapp21 has already suggested
have you ever watched the betting on a two horse race in fact on BB in the past it's very rare for the favourite to be changed something tells me that the bookies have got the sniff of a betting scam and have moved to avert them getting stung by changing the odds as quickly as they have done
jacko12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:06
chapp21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by JamieF
What if its written in ink (IE the grand national in the paper) could they still change the odds so that they wouldn't lose TOO badly?? (the bookies)
Unless you ask to take the price when you make the bet, you will be given the final odds. so if a horse is 10/1 when you have a bet in the morning and in the afternoon the bookies have 100s of thousonds of pounds on it the odds will shortern and shortern and may end up at 2/1.

Unless you asked to take the price of 10/1 you ticket will automatically be payed at 2/1.

Remember that this works both ways so it's not always the best bet to take the price as it might drift out and you could end up with 14/1 for example.
chapp21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:07
toffybolox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wirral
Posts: 210
Originally Posted by earnie
Or the bookies all know something we dont??
The bookies know less than you do. They have work to do and dont spend all day/night watching the streaming. They are mearly adjusting odds in proportion to the money being bet. More people are betting on Mary to be evicted so her price to go is shortening.
toffybolox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:07
dawson
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by JamieF
What if its written in ink (IE the grand national in the paper) could they still change the odds so that they wouldn't lose TOO badly?? (the bookies)
Odds vary all the time - you are quoted the odds at the time of placing the bet and those are the odds that apply to your bet (usually)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:09
afcbfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,288
Originally Posted by JamieF
Thanks man, I get it. Last question... So if the bookies have to pay more for your pound ie 2/1 you get £2 for your £1 and there was an odd of 3/1 where you get £3 for your £1 would it be more likely for 2/1 to occur than 3/1??
A wise man once said, "Betting odds don't measure the likelihood of an event happening. They're merely a measure of our surprise when it does."
afcbfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:10
chapp21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by toffybolox
The bookies know less than you do. They have work to do and dont spend all day/night watching the streaming. They are mearly adjusting odds in proportion to the money being bet. More people are betting on Mary to be evicted so her price to go is shortening.
Don't be fooled. The bookies have every angle covered. There will be people working for bookmakers whos job it is to watch BB 24/7. They leave nothing to chance. Nothing!!!
chapp21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:13
jacko12
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,862
Originally Posted by chapp21
Don't be fooled. The bookies have every angle covered. There will be people working for bookmakers whos job it is to watch BB 24/7. They leave nothing to chance. Nothing!!!
completly agree.
they even have people go down to individual stables to watch how a horse is running on the gallops for weeks before big races...
jacko12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:15
earnie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 702
Originally Posted by toffybolox
The bookies know less than you do. They have work to do and dont spend all day/night watching the streaming. They are mearly adjusting odds in proportion to the money being bet. More people are betting on Mary to be evicted so her price to go is shortening.
Wouldn't be to sure there toffy.
BB is a HUGE money earner for the bookmakers and i wouldn't be suprised if most of the UK bookies had 24/7 dedicated teams to monitor Internet Polls/Live Streams ect.
This would be similar to sporting events such as snooker, tennis, golf ect that usually have 'resident' bookies monitoring throughout these events.
Although i might be totally wrong.

edit*sorry chapp for basically repeating what you quoted.*

Last edited by earnie : 03-06-2005 at 14:18. Reason: chapp made similar reply
earnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:21
dawson
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by earnie
Wouldn't be to sure there toffy.
BB is a HUGE money earner for the bookmakers and i wouldn't be suprised if most of the UK bookies had 24/7 dedicated teams to monitor Internet Polls/Live Streams ect.
This would be similar to sporting events such as snooker, tennis, golf ect that usually have 'resident' bookies monitoring throughout these events.
Although i might be totally wrong.
No, you're not wrong. Paddy Power on BBLB yesterday admitted that he had 2 people watching the live streaming. Also had people watching polls and internet forums etc to try and assess risk. Of course also admitted that the amount of stake money was an influence too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:32
toffybolox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wirral
Posts: 210
Originally Posted by chapp21
Don't be fooled. The bookies have every angle covered. There will be people working for bookmakers whos job it is to watch BB 24/7. They leave nothing to chance. Nothing!!!
I actualy was the odds compiler for a major high street firm for BB4 and watched it no more or less than I do now. Big Brother betting is small potatoes compared to horses, dogs, football etc and no firm will have anyone spending more than 30 minutes a day compiling odds then a few times during the day they will be monitoring the stakes
and competitors odds.
toffybolox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:32
Coljj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,118
http://www.racing-index.com/decimal-...onversion.html
Coljj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:35
toffybolox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wirral
Posts: 210
Originally Posted by dawson
No, you're not wrong. Paddy Power on BBLB yesterday admitted that he had 2 people watching the live streaming. Also had people watching polls and internet forums etc to try and assess risk. Of course also admitted that the amount of stake money was an influence too.
Dont beleive anything PP says, he is a self publisist of the highest order.
toffybolox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:40
fingerbob69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 779
Originally Posted by earnie
The safest way around it is to keep hold of your money.
I have occasionaly learnt the hard way in the past.

the first rule of betting is.....

....only bet that amount of money you are happy to lose.
fingerbob69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 14:43
fingerbob69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 779
v.useful...ty
fingerbob69 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59.