• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Science's Argument - Is he the next Unlucky Housemate?
tonygore
03-06-2005
I don't know if this has been picked up on here, but why did BB tone down Science's row with Roberto (Wednesday) in Last Night's BB?

I remember watching Science's row live and it was very intense and went on for about 10 minutes. Science had basically squared up to Roberto about the cooking and kicked off for ages... Had the italian lost his cool or been a bit younger, then we could have seen some nasty blows.

It makes me wonder if maybe Science will be the next Unlucky housemate and BB want to keep him quiet for now. He can be smart at times, and as he mixes will everyone, I think he could be a good Makosi The Second
Cornchips
03-06-2005
They toned down and edited out completely many of the arguments last night. I think its more to do with the fact that the arguments are becoming boring.
Gaz22
03-06-2005
That argument was never going to come to blows. Both had no intention of fighting.
Jimmy Connors
03-06-2005
They also did not show Science having a hissy fit during the singing on Mary's birthday. They cut the whole sing-fest out of the highlight show.
tonygore
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by Gaz22:
“ Both had no intention of fighting.”

Very few people ever do... I'm sure they didn't plan on fighting last year either.
bulls_hitter
03-06-2005
I saw it live and thought Science (what a stupid name) made a complete pratt of himself.
Gaz22
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by tonygore:
“Very few people ever do... I'm sure they didn't plan on fighting last year either.”


But last year you could see Fight Night coming from a mile away. BB wound them up at let them go. Science and Roberto have a lot of respect for eachother. They weren't going to fight.
homer911
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by bulls_hitter:
“I saw it live and thought Science (what a stupid name) made a complete pratt of himself.”

how many times do i have to say this, roberto started the whole thing.

rose tinted glasses and all that
bulls_hitter
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by homer911:
“how many times do i have to say this, roberto started the whole thing.

rose tinted glasses and all that”

Who started it is not relevant to the argument itself!
homer911
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by bulls_hitter:
“Who started it is not relevant to the argument itself!”

yes it is, if someone has a go at you you fight back.
bulls_hitter
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by homer911:
“yes it is, if someone has a go at you you fight back.”

We'll have to agree to disagree.

Interesting choice of words.....fight back rather than respond......
Alli-F
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by tonygore:
“I don't know if this has been picked up on here, but why did BB tone down Science's row with Roberto (Wednesday) in Last Night's BB?

I remember watching Science's row live and it was very intense and went on for about 10 minutes. Science had basically squared up to Roberto about the cooking and kicked off for ages... Had the italian lost his cool or been a bit younger, then we could have seen some nasty blows.

It makes me wonder if maybe Science will be the next Unlucky housemate and BB want to keep him quiet for now. He can be smart at times, and as he mixes will everyone, I think he could be a good Makosi The Second ”

I don't think that argument makes much sense. Surely, if he was going to be the next unlucky housemate they would show the arguments because that would make the public less sympathetic to watch all of his childish arguing.
Surely, he is lucky to not have his arguing shown?
homer911
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by bulls_hitter:
“We'll have to agree to disagree.

Interesting choice of words.....fight back rather than respond......”

fight back does not have to mean physical

so what you are saying is that you would not stick up for yourself and your opinion if someone starts with you.
bulls_hitter
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by homer911:
“fight back does not have to mean physical

so what you are saying is that you would not stick up for yourself and your opinion if someone starts with you.”

No, that's not what I'm saying.

This is taking the thread off topic, so I'll leave it there.
homer911
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by bulls_hitter:
“No, that's not what I'm saying.

This is taking the thread off topic, so I'll leave it there.”

its not off topic its simple, roberto had a go at science and he had the right to respond which he did.

nothing wrong with that.
pelicano
03-06-2005
Originally Posted by Jimmy Connors:
“They also did not show Science having a hissy fit during the singing on Mary's birthday. They cut the whole sing-fest out of the highlight show.”

I thought that - was v surprised that it hadn't been shown.
baza23
03-06-2005
Science is a complete weed, if Roberto were to hit him, he would have gone flying.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map