• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
1 more strike and Lesley is out of there!
<<
<
2 of 3
>>
>
moogester
09-06-2005
No, no, no Endemol, don't throw her out - if she's ejected she leaves by the back door, with no crowd. If she's evicted on Friday she faces the baying mob Let's see how uncomfortable that makes her feel, she might, just might feel a modicum of empathy for Sam
BeatJunkie
09-06-2005
I don't want her getting an easy way out. I want her evicted by the public so she can realise how absoloutley vile her behaviour is. She's a bloody disgrace, I'd be embarassed to have anything to do with her if I knew her. She's trash.

Although, her getting booted this way would leave the door wide open for Craig via the public vote. I don't think he would have picked up enough votes, this week, sadly.
diary_room
09-06-2005
Lesleh may have SAID she got 2 formal warnings. Doesn't mean she actually did.

Maybe there was no cover-up and Lesleh is just telling porkies.
tazzeroo
09-06-2005
well has she had three warnings or was she just saying that to get a bit more attention. she could have realised that she had gone too far and needed an excuse to back off and get someone else to take over the role of bully. this way she can come up with the ideas (ie the weeing in the shoes) get someone else to do it and sit back and watch.
munta
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by tazzeroo:
“well has she had three warnings or was she just saying that to get a bit more attention. she could have realised that she had gone too far and needed an excuse to back off and get someone else to take over the role of bully. this way she can come up with the ideas (ie the weeing in the shoes) get someone else to do it and sit back and watch.”

That implys a modicum of intelligence
tazzeroo
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by munta:
“That implys a modicum of intelligence ”

I dont think that you have to be intellegent to be sly and scheming just have a secne of self preservation, especially after Max had a go at her. It must have got into her gorgeous head that something was amiss.
tomorrow
09-06-2005
Endemol has always condoned bullying and the mob/pack animal behaviour.

I'm just surprised that people keep voting ....
Alrightmate
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by Tumble weed:
“Lesley has just admitted in the bitching session that she has already received two formal warnings for intimidating behaviour towards Sam. One more and she is out!


These were never talked about in BBLB nor the highlight shows!

Big Brother cover up?”

Definitely.

In all previous series of BB, formal warnings were a big enough deal to be a feature point of the highlight shows.

Curiously enough,..not now when it concerns Lesley.

For Lesley to get formal warnings for intimidating behaviour, BB literally know that she's bullying Sam.
So nobody can now say that the omission of the extent of the bullying that forum members watch on the live feed is merely "accidental" editing, and that they didn't notice.
Alrightmate
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by torchomatic:
“Be careful, your pea sized brain may explode! It obviously can't cope with all the Endermol conspiracy theories you've concocted.”

Not conspiracy "theories"..conspiracy facts.

Unless you believe that the forum members on the WHATM threads are all telling lies together at the same time on what they report is being said and done in the house on the live feed.

Of course some people might put spin and particular context into things,...but many are simply reporting what has been said and what actions are taking place.

If you do believe that they are all telling lies and making things up all together at the same time,....then it you who is concocting a conspiracy theory.

Everyone reporting what is said and done during events on the live feed, ALL spontaneously telling lies and making things up at the same time,...now that's a conspiracy theory.
Dannouk
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by Helga:
“ I hate Endemol.”

You hate a production company. Thats just weird.
yellowlabbie
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by moogester:
“No, no, no Endemol, don't throw her out - if she's ejected she leaves by the back door, with no crowd. If she's evicted on Friday she faces the baying mob Let's see how uncomfortable that makes her feel, she might, just might feel a modicum of empathy for Sam ”

Well said moogester, if the public don't vote her out on Friday, then they can throw her out.
Doc Shmok
09-06-2005
So Sam's clothes were stolen.. Didn't know that..
Energy Arrow
09-06-2005
Lesley is without doubt the "chosen one" this year. They won't throw her out no matter what she does. She is the new Jade as far as they are concerned.
slappers r us
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by Doc Shmok:
“So Sam's clothes were stolen.. Didn't know that.. ”

yes lesley also wanted to pinch saskias bras and that was on day 2

sams skirts had been missing from day 1
yellowlabbie
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“yes lesley also wanted to pinch saskias bras and that was on day 2

sams skirts had been missing from day 1”

That's why she always wears a bikini
afcbfan
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“sams skirts had been missing from day 1”

It's funny that, isn't it? What with Lesleh admitting in the diary room that she hated Sam from Day 1 and all.

I think we actually know she hated her from minute 1, giving the way her face dropped when she walked through the door. No wonder in her audition video she said she didn't really get on with women.
munta
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“yes lesley also wanted to pinch saskias bras and that was on day 2

sams skirts had been missing from day 1”

I've heard this rumour. Is there any "news" article on it.
Doc Shmok
09-06-2005
50/1 she is gone..
<<bemused>>
09-06-2005
It will be an absolute travesty if Sam is voted out instead of Lesley - most viewers will dislike Sam for the bikini wearing issue. If Lesley or anyone else hid Sam's clothes, then Sam's 'character' in the house has been falsified.

Maybe viewers are given a certain 'spin' on terrestrial in order to add value to satellite/cable programming.
DryHumper
09-06-2005
Still no mention of the formal warnings on BBLB today
Helga
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by torchomatic:
“Be careful, your pea sized brain may explode! It obviously can't cope with all the Endermol conspiracy theories you've concocted.”

Ha ha - your Fat Lez is coming home. Nar nar ni nar nar!
brian's eyebrow
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by Helga:
“Endemol are not doing themselves any favours!

Any product, policy or person Endemol try to promote in future can rightly be regarded as trash, and that all hype put out by Endemol is lying spinning rubbish.

How can they cover this up?

They covered up the theft of Sam’s clothes for over a week and even put in the edits footage that created the impression that she was a stupid bint who lost her clothes.

It is disgraceful. I hate Endemol.”

I think most of us woke up to this at BB3 if not before.
DillholeMcGinty
09-06-2005
Originally Posted by Tumble weed:
“Lesley has just admitted in the bitching session that she has already received two formal warnings for intimidating behaviour towards Sam. One more and she is out!


These were never talked about in BBLB nor the highlight shows!

Big Brother cover up?”

its appaling that the first warning wasnt reported on any of the highlight shows.

How profoundly stupid is Lesley that after the first time she couldnt stop herself from continuing.
billgates
09-06-2005
i mean will she last till tomorrow night and if she gets her 3rd by friday night could big brother work it we get a double eviction with the next higest person going as well
DryHumper
09-06-2005
It would be a shame if she was booted out for breaking the rules, because that would mean Sam would be evicted as well, and I think Sam deserves a week in there without the constant menace of Lesley.
<<
<
2 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map