Originally Posted by Rubber Nun:
“Perhaps he could bring a couple of real boy scouts in with him?”
“Perhaps he could bring a couple of real boy scouts in with him?”
I'm sure he's very well acquainted with boy scouts and their toggles.
Guest housemates
2 of 2
Originally Posted by pairofpants:
“I'm sure he's very well acquainted with boy scouts and their toggles.”
“I'm sure he's very well acquainted with boy scouts and their toggles.”
Isn't it woggle?
Originally Posted by Rubber Nun:
“Isn't it woggle?”
“Isn't it woggle?”
Hmmm - just googled it. Both toggles and woggles are part of the scouting paraphernalia. We need a friendly scout to do us a good deed and tell us what the difference is please.
Originally Posted by pairofpants:
“Hmmm - just googled it. Both toggles and woggles are part of the scouting paraphernalia. We need a friendly scout to do us a good deed and tell us what the difference is please.”
“Hmmm - just googled it. Both toggles and woggles are part of the scouting paraphernalia. We need a friendly scout to do us a good deed and tell us what the difference is please.”
The woggle is the ring thingy they put round their neck scarf thingies, I do believe.
Originally Posted by fdooby:
“The woggle is the ring thingy they put round their neck scarf thingies, I do believe.”
“The woggle is the ring thingy they put round their neck scarf thingies, I do believe.”
So to change my post slightly:
I'm sure he's very well acquainted with boy scouts and their woggles.
Originally Posted by pairofpants:
“I'm sure he's very well acquainted with boy scouts and their toggles.”
“I'm sure he's very well acquainted with boy scouts and their toggles.”
Do I detect a whiff of twisted homophobic logic there? Because Barrymore is gay, you automatically brand him as a paedophile? Is that the assumption you were insinuating?
and some of you have the audacity to accuse Max of homophobia and bigotry.
Originally Posted by Candyman:
“Do I detect a whiff of twisted homophobic logic there? Because Barrymore is gay, you automatically brand him as a paedophile? Is that the assumption you were insinuating?
and some of you have the audacity to accuse Max of homophobia and bigotry.”
“Do I detect a whiff of twisted homophobic logic there? Because Barrymore is gay, you automatically brand him as a paedophile? Is that the assumption you were insinuating?
and some of you have the audacity to accuse Max of homophobia and bigotry.”
Oh FFS, he used to do a boy scout dance it was part of his bloody act. we were just musing about the surreal possiblity of Barrymore coming into the house. No homophobia intended, please report me if you want to, and then at least I'll be able to get some bloody work done this summer.
Originally Posted by Candyman:
“Do I detect a whiff of twisted homophobic logic there? Because Barrymore is gay, you automatically brand him as a paedophile? Is that the assumption you were insinuating?
and some of you have the audacity to accuse Max of homophobia and bigotry.”
“Do I detect a whiff of twisted homophobic logic there? Because Barrymore is gay, you automatically brand him as a paedophile? Is that the assumption you were insinuating?
and some of you have the audacity to accuse Max of homophobia and bigotry.”
hey candyman i suggest you look up what derek has been up to before you start haveing a go at people ..derek isnt a nice man ...search on google
Originally Posted by Candyman:
“Do I detect a whiff of twisted homophobic logic there? Because Barrymore is gay, you automatically brand him as a paedophile? Is that the assumption you were insinuating?
and some of you have the audacity to accuse Max of homophobia and bigotry.”
“Do I detect a whiff of twisted homophobic logic there? Because Barrymore is gay, you automatically brand him as a paedophile? Is that the assumption you were insinuating?
and some of you have the audacity to accuse Max of homophobia and bigotry.”
No, you don't detect a whiff of twisted homphobic logic. If you'd actually paid attention to the rest of the thread, this conversation has been based on some fairly dark/surrealist humour. Daft, yes. Homophobic, no.
Awright?
Originally Posted by Rubber Nun:
“No, you don't detect a whiff of twisted homphobic logic. If you'd actually paid attention to the rest of the thread, this conversation has been based on some fairly dark/surrealist humour. Daft, yes. Homophobic, no.
Awright?”
“No, you don't detect a whiff of twisted homphobic logic. If you'd actually paid attention to the rest of the thread, this conversation has been based on some fairly dark/surrealist humour. Daft, yes. Homophobic, no.
Awright?”
Fair enough. I am aware that Barrymore had scouts as part of his act, but I did think that "I bet he is well familiar with scouts woggles" type angle which the thread had turned was a little suspect, to be honest. It appeared to insinuate, that Barrymore = gay, and had boy scouts in his act, ergo must have intimate knowledge of young boys, ergo must be paedophile. Obviously must be just me being my uber-sensitive self.
Apologies. No offence meant.
Originally Posted by Candyman:
“Fair enough. I am aware that Barrymore had scouts as part of his act, but I did think that "I bet he is well familiar with scouts woggles" type angle which the thread had turned was a little suspect, to be honest. It appeared to insinuate, that Barrymore = gay, and had boy scouts in his act, ergo must have intimate knowledge of young boys, ergo must be paedophile. Obviously must be just me being my uber-sensitive self.
Apologies. No offence meant.”
“Fair enough. I am aware that Barrymore had scouts as part of his act, but I did think that "I bet he is well familiar with scouts woggles" type angle which the thread had turned was a little suspect, to be honest. It appeared to insinuate, that Barrymore = gay, and had boy scouts in his act, ergo must have intimate knowledge of young boys, ergo must be paedophile. Obviously must be just me being my uber-sensitive self.
Apologies. No offence meant.”
It's easily done on this forum as a lot of sensitive issues do get touched upon and people do get passionate about a few subjects.
Don't worry about it.
Originally Posted by Candyman:
“Fair enough. I am aware that Barrymore had scouts as part of his act, but I did think that "I bet he is well familiar with scouts woggles" type angle which the thread had turned was a little suspect, to be honest. It appeared to insinuate, that Barrymore = gay, and had boy scouts in his act, ergo must have intimate knowledge of young boys, ergo must be paedophile. Obviously must be just me being my uber-sensitive self.
Apologies. No offence meant.”
“Fair enough. I am aware that Barrymore had scouts as part of his act, but I did think that "I bet he is well familiar with scouts woggles" type angle which the thread had turned was a little suspect, to be honest. It appeared to insinuate, that Barrymore = gay, and had boy scouts in his act, ergo must have intimate knowledge of young boys, ergo must be paedophile. Obviously must be just me being my uber-sensitive self.
Apologies. No offence meant.”
And neither did I mean to cause offence, it was really more of a joke on the ridiculousness of the word "woggle".
Perhaps it is time that the housemates did do a scouts task, although i suspect it would be too intellectual for them.
2 of 2
