DS Forums

 
 

If K9 came back (DR Who)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-06-2005, 10:37
gooleman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 62

Wouldn't it be good if he did with his master IE the fourth Doctor Tom Baker for a few episodes.

They have done stories before with more then one doctor, be good to see Tom doing his stuff again.
gooleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-06-2005, 10:41
onion3000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 783
Originally Posted by gooleman
Wouldn't it be good if he did with his master IE the fourth Doctor Tom Baker for a few episodes.

They have done stories before with more then one doctor, be good to see Tom doing his stuff again.

Without the Timelord's help I don't think the doctor will meet himself just yet, but it's a good bet that Sarah Jane Smith (if negotiations work out) and the rusty dog will make for an interesting episode. I personally think that K9 should lay down his life for his master at the end, but that's just me!
onion3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2005, 11:14
ethel_wombat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,121
Originally Posted by onion3000
I personally think that K9 should lay down his life for his master at the end, but that's just me!
How about laying down his life at the start
ethel_wombat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2005, 12:14
onion3000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 783
Originally Posted by ethel_wombat
How about laying down his life at the start

Perhaps the Tardis could land on him.

'That's more than lucky!'
onion3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2005, 12:38
*Eileen*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,658
Originally Posted by onion3000
Perhaps the Tardis could land on him.

'That's more than lucky!'
That made me laugh, though I feel a bit guilty that it did considering the 'real' Lucky died not so long back
*Eileen* is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:22.