• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Aw. Another pro-Science show.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
Shady Dan
19-07-2005
no-one cares!!!!

we're going off topic now
Sigurd
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by small_G:
“Watch out Sigurd, the deal was, no posting about the 'un-named one'. ”

Ah, but I warned you that I was a liar, didn't I?

Hmm, I haven't checked up on your posts for a while, small, to see if you're keeping your word...
sleepwalker
19-07-2005
We went off-topic after like, the first four posts. <_<
Sigurd
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Shady Dan:
“no-one cares!!!!

we're going off topic now”

Good. I like it when we go off-topic.
brightlights
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Sigurd:
“How dare you! I've posted quite a lot against Science, or at least against his more rabid fans. Am I illiterate?”

Hee! Yes, I've noticed. And no, you're not. Unless the fact that you misinterpreted my post counts as illiteracy. I spoke of a general tendency. Of course there are exceptions!

Cannot stop laughing because I am triple checking for typos. This is just getting too silly...
small_G
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Sigurd:
“Ah, but I warned you that I was a liar, didn't I?

Hmm, I haven't checked up on your posts for a while, small, to see if you're keeping your word... ”

Please do!

I've been AFK for the last 10 hours, so been unable to post.
brightlights
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by sleepwalker:
“Are you challenging me to a literacy duel? >_>”

I might have to, just to see how a literacy duel actually works!

Dare I gloveslap you? *ponders*

Actually, no...I'm going to bed now. Consider me a coward if you must.
Susann
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Cazarella:
“Yep tomorrow...

C4 @ 7.30am
E4 @ 3.25pm

”

Thank you
Sigurd
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by small_G:
“Please do!

I've been AFK for the last 10 hours, so been unable to post. ”

OK, then; I won't bother to check up on you.* And I'm going to bed now. Enough of this nonsense!



*Of course, I'm not really going to "check up on you" anyway. Only kidding. But our paths may cross...
burstovary
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Jazzyjedart:
“Tonight was the first ever highlights show where Science came out well, about time too”

they did it when they were trying to get rid of max as well

last night live feed showed science at his worse

i can only hope people had a flavour of what this nincumpoop is up to when they show his tirades against all and sundry
small_G
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Sigurd:
“OK, then; I won't bother to check up on you.* And I'm going to bed now. Enough of this nonsense!



*Of course, I'm not really going to "check up on you" anyway. Only kidding. But our paths may cross... ”

lol, so, we've done the deal, and I can go back to praising the un-named one?
Susann
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by sleepwalker:
“Hm. I wonder is there's a link between Science fans and poor spelling, grammar and punctuation. >_>”



When all else fails and no arguement is forthcoming. It's let's pick on the poor spelling, grammar and punctuation
Sigurd
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by small_G:
“lol, so, we've done the deal, and I can go back to praising the un-named one? ”

I've got a nasty feeling you'll do exactly what you want anyway!
sleepwalker
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by brightlights:
“I might have to, just to see how a literacy duel actually works!

Dare I gloveslap you? *ponders*

Actually, no...I'm going to bed now. Consider me a coward if you must. ”

We must fight to the literal death at another occasion, then!
merlincat
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Sigurd:
“Actually, "egoistic" is a word, listed in Chambers Dictionary and no doubt others too.”

You beat me to it
Yep, egoistic is the correct (and appropriate) term.
small_G
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Sigurd:
“I've got a nasty feeling you'll do exactly what you want anyway! ”

No, No, I'm a man of my word, and if we're still in agreement, I'll refrain from supporting the un-named one, if you do the same about targetting him.

(Until you get sick of something he does, and you call him that is).
Sigurd
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by merlincat:
“You beat me to it
Yep, egoistic is the correct (and appropriate) term.”

Well, egotistic would have been fine too, or even egocentric.

And now I am going.
Alrightmate
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Cazarella:
“There was a lot cut out. One of the main things that wasn't really shown was the way in which Derek stirred the pot and created an atmosphere. Although Science got a good deal out of that Highlights show so did many others. Craig came off worst imo... and in fact that was probably a fair reflection as he was the most antagonistic... all spurned from jealousy!”

I agree,..there was a lot cut.

If they wanted they could have made Science look much better, and the others much worse.

There were bits that just didn't put certain things into context, and would have been more in Science's favour.

The bit between Anthony and Science that wasn't shown didn't do Ant many favours, and showed Science trying to get Anthony to talk without getting angry.

Anthony was ranting at Science. Science tried to tell Ant to just talk, but Ant was having none of it, and Ant's voice started going into that "ready to have a fight" voice that sometimes comes out when he's had too much beer.

Science was trying to calm it down, but Anthony was dragging old stuff back up from the past. Something which on tonight's highlight show was mentioned when Ant was telling other people not to drag up the past.
Science is obviously going to want to defend himself, but he was trying to talk with Anthony, but Anthony was just throwing petty digs at him,.....and it all came out that Ant holds a lot of resentment to Science simply because Science beat Max in the eviction battle.
Ant was just digging old stuff back up which wasn't in any way constructive, and it was just designed to have a go at Science.

Ant was just winding himself up. All Sceince was trying to do was defend himself....but Ant was getting angry with Science for simply defending himself.

It all came out when Ant had a bit of beer in him.
He has contempt for Science because Science survived, and Max didn't.
Ant said some very hurtful things to Science as he was leaving the room.

The thing that these little pea brains can't get into their thick skulls, is that it was the housemates themselves who put Science up against Max.
It was their own faults for putting Science up against Max.

What gets me more than anything, is that Science is criticised for simply defending himself.
Some times it's others who kick off the situation, yet Science gets the blame for just defending himself.

It was Craig who had a hissy fit over the mince. Science put some mince back, yet Craig was carrying on like Science had killed his dog.
So all housemates steam into Science despite him putting some mince back,...so what the hell is Science supposed to do?
It's all very well saying Science should have been calm when Anthony was talking to him...but Anthony was saying things that were just simply wrong, and untrue.

Craig has been making pasta meals for Ant in the early hours every single night, yet they blame Science for food shortage.

They didn't show some of the housemates helping themselves to some big sandwiches later on when Science wasn't there.......which leads me to believe that this supposed food shortage wasn't as bad as was made out.
So there was supposed to be food rationing, but they can eat what they want when Science isn't there?

Why should it be only Science who has to follow this food rationing rule, while the others can eat whatever they want, when they want?

They also decided not to show Science walking in on a load of housemates assassinating his character....again...what is Science supposed to do?


Science has been pretty quiet on the arguing front for quite a while, then the day before noms, all the housemates are pointing fingers at him.

How dare Science speak out against them when they are lining him up to be nominated for eviction....how rude of him, he should know his place and keep his mouth shut.

I think yesterday was a situation where Science was justified in defending himself.
He was getting a lot of grief from all angles for no real reason.
Veri
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by brightlights:
“Google comma splice and you'll find thousands of better explanations. But basically you can't use a comma to join two full sentences into one. Speaking as a semicolon fan I would have to say it bugs me.”

No, independent clauses (clauses which could stand as sentences) can be joined with a comma; it is not always an error.

See for example this page: http://www.grammartips.homestead.com/spliceok.html
grannyzee
19-07-2005
Yep. 7.30am on C4 and around 3pm on E4. Science to win.
grannyzee
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Sigurd:
“Well, egotistic would have been fine too, or even egocentric.

And now I am going.”

Or egomaniac (Oooooo get me)
grannyzee
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by sleepwalker:
“*rolls eyes*

I can't believe they're pushing this egoistic moron to win.”

You mean the same egoistic moron who does the cooking, washing up, cleaning etc. Oh my God, how could they possibly see anything good about HIM?
Sigurd
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Veri:
“No, independent clauses (clauses which could stand as sentences) can be joined with a comma; it is not always an error.

See for example this page: http://www.grammartips.homestead.com/spliceok.html”

However, Veri, you'll have noted the caveats in the last three paragraphs of that sensible advice, and particularly in the last paragraph. Like a shotgun, the comma splice can be dangerous in untrained hands. Well, not quite as dangerous...
brightlights
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by Veri:
“No, independent clauses (clauses which could stand as sentences) can be joined with a comma; it is not always an error.

See for example this page: http://www.grammartips.homestead.com/spliceok.html”

Yes. I was giving the short version. I did say to consult Google for the full story!
gertie
19-07-2005
Originally Posted by xavier2k3:
“you also mean egotistic? and im guessing you do, and you're wrong even then, he's the only one that deserves to win. if you believe he doesn't, you should throw away your tv now.

regards
--marty”


Deserves to win!!!!!! He's a loud mouth lout and needs to be bought down a peg or two, to make him realise that his behaviour will not be tolerated in the outside world.

The last thing he needs is to be rewarded for his behaviour
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map