I'm off to do the new thread back in a mo with link
WHATM: Day 54 - 19th July: 06:00am - Midday
12 of 12
Originally Posted by SydneyHopper:
“Amazing how many people complain about
Science's ranting, while using the medium of 'rant'
”
“Amazing how many people complain about
Science's ranting, while using the medium of 'rant'
”
But at least you can`t hear me!
BB calls Kemal and Science to the DR.
Kemal: Ooh, we're in trouble Science because of what you've done.
Kemal: Ooh, we're in trouble Science because of what you've done.
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“Nothing at all wrong with being a naughty dog. What is wrong, however, is deliberately removing his collar just minutes after a laminate was read out from BB instructing HMs that collars and leads must be worn until further notice. He is not naughty........he`s just attention-seeking.”
“Nothing at all wrong with being a naughty dog. What is wrong, however, is deliberately removing his collar just minutes after a laminate was read out from BB instructing HMs that collars and leads must be worn until further notice. He is not naughty........he`s just attention-seeking.”
Why should he support that great lie
of social harmony, when most are trying
to find the kink in his armour, so that they
can oust him from the game?
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“We were talking about Science, not Craig.
Yes - Craig is selfish - as in fact is everyone in that House. However, Science is the only one who subjects us to out of control, interminable, childish temper-tantrum rants.
What annoys me even more about him is that once the rants are over he just expects people to forget about it and treat him normally again.
It`s about time he learnt that behaviour can have consequences.”
“We were talking about Science, not Craig.
Yes - Craig is selfish - as in fact is everyone in that House. However, Science is the only one who subjects us to out of control, interminable, childish temper-tantrum rants.
What annoys me even more about him is that once the rants are over he just expects people to forget about it and treat him normally again.
It`s about time he learnt that behaviour can have consequences.”
No, he isn't the only one. Craig was out of control Sunday night. Orlaith was out of control on Saturday (but luckily for her, she was edited favourably).
Quite frankly, I'd prefer someone to air their beef, and get over it, than someone who stews on it and chews on the same old beef over and over again, embellishing it as they go. Kemal and Craig are classic examples of why holding grudges is very unhealthy. It is destroying them.
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“However, Science is the only one who subjects us to out of control, interminable, childish temper-tantrum rants.
What annoys me even more about him is that once the rants are over he just expects people to forget about it and treat him normally again.
It`s about time he learnt that behaviour can have consequences.”
“However, Science is the only one who subjects us to out of control, interminable, childish temper-tantrum rants.
What annoys me even more about him is that once the rants are over he just expects people to forget about it and treat him normally again.
It`s about time he learnt that behaviour can have consequences.”
Going a bit OT, apologies.
BB seems to be just one step ahead of real life. We seem to be moving further and further towards a consequence-free world. It's all relative, good is bad, bad is good. There are no sanctions or punishments, and the tabloid press and tabloid-style television increasingly promote various kinds of 'bad' behaviour as acceptable and sometimes even desirable. Any publicity is good publicity.
Originally Posted by Ballyhooly:
“Maxwell got himself disliked by Scabgate and poowater...”
“Maxwell got himself disliked by Scabgate and poowater...”
Agreed. And this established Science's victimhood and I think that this has stayed in the minds of the people who vote.
We can see how obnoxious Science can be but I don't think that this comes scross in highlights. Apart from being a constant irritant in the House, Science performs in the DR like a sweet reasonable hard done by 60's hippy. Peace and Love and all that.
Highlights shots of him in tasks make him look enthusiastic and part of the group. He doesn't come across as obsessed by his image, doesn't seem to have many clothes and doesn't boast about about how many holidays he has had in far flung places.
In a subtle way he seems to have created a constant image of himself seen by Highlights watchers and voters. He reinforces this with his mirror monologues.
When he manages to turn the pack against him he just looks sad and lonely hard done by and hang-dog.
Originally Posted by donsy90:
“As i said before, if the task was already failed, then what would be the point of reminding the HMs of the rules?”
“As i said before, if the task was already failed, then what would be the point of reminding the HMs of the rules?”
Because BB may want them to continue for the two more days that the task is supposed to last for.
One thing that continues to puzzle me about Science is that he appears to get to the point where he is unable to control his behaviour. However he himself has said that he doesn't behave like this at home, suggesting that he is capable of controlling himself, and that his parents would not tolerate behaviour like this from him.
WHATM. Into the garden, balloons were mentioned.
WHATM. Into the garden, balloons were mentioned.
Originally Posted by Inge Jones:
“They're probably becoming worried on Health and Safety grounds with the HMs apparently on starvation rations for almost the whole of the 11 weeks. Has there ever been a BB like this before when they were on £1 a day for so long? I don't call £3 a day exactly a "luxury" budget either”
“They're probably becoming worried on Health and Safety grounds with the HMs apparently on starvation rations for almost the whole of the 11 weeks. Has there ever been a BB like this before when they were on £1 a day for so long? I don't call £3 a day exactly a "luxury" budget either”
It's not 1-for-1 in terms of money - as far as I'm aware they get a price list and they then have to select items off the list for the weeks food.
Originally Posted by Ballyhooly:
“Because BB may want them to continue for the two more days that the task is supposed to last for.”
“Because BB may want them to continue for the two more days that the task is supposed to last for.”
But why remind them , why not just leave it?
Originally Posted by donsy90:
“But why remind them , why not just leave it?”
“But why remind them , why not just leave it?”
Perhaps (and I am just guessing):
BB thinks it is more entertaining to have the dogs on leads, so want to enforce it, whether they have failed or not.
Now they have sent Science to the naughty step. They could have just failed him. But his disobedience will have more entertainment if he received punishment.
I have to admit, Maxwell and Kemal were funny on the naughty step. Anthony got away with murder, as they allowed Craig to massage him when he was on the step!!!
Oi! Past midday. We've got stuck here while everyone else has moved on!
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...32#post4902332
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...32#post4902332
12 of 12
