• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Hey, Conspiracy Theorists!
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Getmeoutofhyaaa
20-07-2005
Originally Posted by Stentionhouse:
“I thought early on that Derek was the person who had been earmarked to stay to end, perhaps even win. He gets preferential treatment (watch, extra luxury items, seeming immunity from punishment no matter what he does ...”

But has he actually broken rules though?

I seem to recall that the one time he openly discussed nominations, he was punished.
Getmeoutofhyaaa
20-07-2005
Originally Posted by metafis:
“Yes, Ive always said this. Endemol dont care who wins, but they do edit for 'storyline' purposes, or to make a HM 'fit into' the personna that has been created for the specific reason of having that personna in a story line.”

You mean they don't just randomly show any old 45 minutes of footage no matter what is happening? They actually pick and choose which bits to show?

Well I never. Hold the front page!
Supachipz
20-07-2005
Originally Posted by klunk:
“In other words they edit the show with a view to making it more interesting? Standard practice in light entertainment telly, one would have thought.”


Exactly! If they are to make the show entertaining, and make money from it, they need to have high viewing figures. Therefore they have to edit it into some sort of storyline.

Im sure many people here wouldn't watch the show if it was a jumbled together mismatch of pointless situations such as Science going to the toilet and not coming out for 10 minutes or Makosi putting her make up on! That would be boring, and if the editing together hadn't been done since the original series then the show would not be on our screens today!

It really gets me down when people come online to moan about somthing that they are watching everynight. If they want to moan about it, they clearly don't like it, and as such wouldn't be enjoying themselves. Surely they would be happier and the forum would be a better place to be if people who didn't like it, didn't watch it! As symple as!

I think Avid Merrion sums it up best towards the end of his Book "Book Selecta when he says:


Originally Posted by Avid Merrion:
“I never understood fan sites where they slag everything off. Why are they fans of shit they don't like? When I am a fan of somthing, every toss I do I have that show, movie, popstar, actor, actress, celab in mind. I eat them, I drink them, I shit them out and draw pictures of them!”


Makes sense to me!
Stentionhouse
20-07-2005
Originally Posted by Getmeoutofhyaaa:
“But has he actually broken rules though?

I seem to recall that the one time he openly discussed nominations, he was punished.”

By wearing a watch he's broken the rules.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map