• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
The Subject of The Science Subject.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
The Hornet
23-07-2005
Originally Posted by wwwizard:
“So basically you are just playing Devils advocate now then ”

I try,
but like I say and have said before, I get pulled into the science is a saint discussions that appear all too frequently and the 'team/mob' mentality that goes with it (basically if you don't agree, get out),
I see those conversations and FMs (most of the time) as being very blinkered and unwilling to compromise and see other FMs point of view.
but that is only my opinion
Malthus55
23-07-2005
Originally Posted by The Hornet:
“I have decided to post this becaue I posted it on another thread and was told (like anyone else who think people are dwelling) to "go away and start a new thread", by a science fan,

so I have.

I think there is a general wish to dwell on the science subject,
that way they will ruin the forum because their boy is out. (kind of like forum hooliganism)
I want to get back to different conversations,
not keep saying "science deserved to go because the public voted him out",
there seems to be a lack of understanding for this 'way out' concept.

Hes gone, I want to move on.”


I think you are wrong on many points in your opening post.

Huge sweeping statement that the “general wish” is to dwell – there are many hundreds of forum members, how do you reach this conclusion?- could you possibly give me a statistical analysis of your theory?

Its not even 24 hours after the largest eviction of BB6 and you are concerned that people are posting and discussing Science on a Big Brother forum? – are you up to speed as to the purpose of this forum?

What’s stopping you getting back to different conversations? – there are many threads that have no mention of Science.

I believe as long as FMs stay within the T&Cs they are perfectly at liberty to discuss any theory they wish – if you don’t like it don’t contribute to it.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map