|
||||||||
Censorship - Gone too far? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,239
|
Censorship - Gone too far?
So far we have:
E4 coverage almost unwatchable We were 'told' about Sandy urinating in the bin! Ummm, don't you have cameras in the house? The whole Sandy leaving revolt (including a discussion of mass walkout) was never even hinted at. And after 2 series just waiting for sex, we allegedly have 2 BJs on the one night and there's no mention at all on any BB coverage, yet the media and gossip sites all have it. BB is now total rubbish, whats the point of reality TV if they're editing it so much? pjh |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Swansea, Wales
Posts: 1,041
|
Re: Censorship - Gone too far?
Quote:
Originally posted by pjh 2 BJs? I know about Jade on PJ, who got the other one and from whom?
And after 2 series just waiting for sex, we allegedly have 2 BJs on the one night and there's no mention at all on any BB coverage, yet the media and gossip sites all have it. pjh |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: WhereVerWhenEver
Posts: 53
|
To make us all go and buy the uncut vid...
make money... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 45
|
Re: Censorship - Gone too far?
Quote:
Originally posted by pjh Yes they do We were 'told' about Sandy urinating in the bin! Ummm, don't you have cameras in the house? pjh http://www.channel4.com/apps3/bigbro...ry.jsp?id=5017 Is discussed on thread http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...threadid=26745 It was sooo good to see Kate and Adele emptying that Bin
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
|
Re: Re: Censorship - Gone too far?
Quote:
Originally posted by munkeee According to an article on the MediaGuardian web site, Lee and Sophie -- on the same night as PJ's BJ. The BB production team are referring to it as BB's BJ number two.2 BJs? I know about Jade on PJ, who got the other one and from whom? And what about Davina's comment on the show this evening: "Jade found a new way to supplement her diet..."! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,239
|
Re: Re: Censorship - Gone too far?
Quote:
Originally posted by MOIKE So why was that shot not used on TV? Yes they do It was sooo good to see Kate and Adele emptying that Bin
pjh |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,445
|
BB is in a difficult position with the law isn't it? It cannot guarantee even after the 9.00 o'clock watershed that minors will not be watching... but I agree that BB on C4 especially tells a very skew story of what is going on, but nothing new there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 45
|
Re: Re: Re: Censorship - Gone too far?
Quote:
Originally posted by pjh The shot of them emptying the Bin was .. it leaked all over the floor .... yuk ......So why was that shot not used on TV? pjh As for why they never showed sandy performing the actual act I am not sure... perhaps that will be one for the DVD ... or maybe Kates or Adeles leaving interview
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norf London (red side)
Posts: 1,500
|
Re: Re: Re: Censorship - Gone too far?
Quote:
Originally posted by maggie Good job PJ wasn't in the rich house and Jade doin it through the bars or BB would have confiscated the 'supplement' as it had passed from one side to the other !!And what about Davina's comment on the show this evening: "Jade found a new way to supplement her diet..."!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 45
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Censorship - Gone too far?
Quote:
Originally posted by plums OW !!!!! Good job PJ wasn't in the rich house and Jade doin it through the bars or BB would have confiscated the 'supplement' as it had passed from one side to the other !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally posted by johnno Have you ever watched channel 5 after 10? It can't be anything to do with the watershed. C4 just want to sell us the video. And its gonna work BB is in a difficult position with the law isn't it? It cannot guarantee even after the 9.00 o'clock watershed that minors will not be watching... but I agree that BB on C4 especially tells a very skew story of what is going on, but nothing new there. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,118
|
Quote:
Originally posted by andysmith88 Yeah a little bit of movement of bed covers filmed by an infra red camera does not break broadcast regualtions. C4 wont get my money ANY OF IT. I'll just go to the newsgroups. Have you ever watched channel 5 after 10? It can't be anything to do with the watershed. C4 just want to sell us the video. And its gonna work
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 890
|
If it's for the dvd/video then I'm suprised they showed the escape,cos that will be on the cover
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 38
|
It's a balance of keeping enough viewers interested so they'll be hooked enough to go out and buy the uncut video.
Cynical commercialism is the reality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,239
|
This DVD/Video thing
I'm not sure I buy this 'Saving it for the video' stuff.
How much money do they make from the vid compared to the actual TV series. I mean there can't be that much money to be made from the video otherwise it would be a primary form of distributing entertainment. pjh |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Exeter
Posts: 4,063
|
Quote:
Originally posted by johnno It's not really a "legal" issue, it's do do with the conditions of the licence. It would only become a legal issue if something REALLY offensive were to be shown, so unless they start buggering (mods please don't edit this word out: it's a LEGAL word, and I should know) each other etc, most editing is presumably being done to make the video/DVD more interesting... he said cynically.BB is in a difficult position with the law isn't it? It cannot guarantee even after the 9.00 o'clock watershed that minors will not be watching... but I agree that BB on C4 especially tells a very skew story of what is going on, but nothing new there. jack |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 872
|
the show:
"we are sorry for the gaps in the sound, this is to make sure that BB is suitable for daytime viewing" at 1:30 am. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Thatcham
Posts: 7
|
I know that the watershed starts at 9pm, but what time in the morning does it end?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,076
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Grahammm The watershed finishes at 5.30amI know that the watershed starts at 9pm, but what time in the morning does it end? http://www.itc.org.uk/itc_publicatio.../section_1.asp Gareth |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Father Jack Care to elaborate on your *inside* knowledge. As you seem to be a man of the cloth I can't say I'm surpised though. so unless they start buggering (mods please don't edit this word out: it's a LEGAL word, and I should know)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:02.

