• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
What would you have done?
jezza
16-06-2002
I would have chosen to live on the rich side and leave everyone else on the poor side.

you treat everyone as equals
you get to have a break from the rest and a good sleep which should keep you happy
you get respect for having the balls to stand out
Calrissian
16-06-2002
Yeah, i've said this before as well.
I'd have taken the rich bedroom, and to hell with the rest of them.
johnno
16-06-2002
then Alex guarantees top nominations! And eviction for being a selfish b*astard. Well, maybe with a £400 budget to himself he could have an eating frenzy on his own for a week and roll out to face his public next Friday! Think Alex still wants to win tho'! Alex has come out of this OK - it's Spencer and PJ who have said too much. After tha whole whineing session with PJ, Spencer has the damned nerve to say to Alex that he has no problem with his choice. Liars!!! Show the two sides of Spencer please C4!!!!
jezza
16-06-2002
I can't help think that no-one would have been annoyed with Alex if he made that decision, he could have easily justified it by saying he didn't want to choose favourites. Now he's caused a load of tension.
jezza
16-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by johnno
then Alex guarantees top nominations! And eviction for being a selfish b*astard. Well, maybe with a £400 budget to himself he could have an eating frenzy on his own for a week and roll out to face his public next Friday! Think Alex still wants to win tho'! Alex has come out of this OK - it's Spencer and PJ who have said too much. After tha whole whineing session with PJ, Spencer has the damned nerve to say to Alex that he has no problem with his choice. Liars!!! Show the two sides of Spencer please C4!!!! ”

I don't think he has come out alright

Kate, PJ, Spencer and Johnny are going to vote for him now

And possibly Sophie because he'll probably annoy her all week

Still 4 votes is enough
kevraff
16-06-2002
Alex should have chosen to live on the poor side with Jonny Sophie and Kate. It you have to make a few sacrifices if you want to win 70 grand. This move would have made him popular with everyone.

But instead he just chose the girls because they are closest to his standards in toilet hygene. Minus Kate. Everyone on the poor side will just nominate him and Sophie next week. What a div!!!!!
GeoffH
16-06-2002
I would have taken Adele, Spencer and PJ with me to the rich side.
jezza
16-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by kevraff
Everyone on the poor side will just nominate him and Sophie next week. What a div!!!!! ”

Wonder how Sophie feels now? I reckon her elation was false and secretly she's annoyed that she's being made to look unpopular by being the only person to be in the rich side 2 weeks in a row.
johnno
16-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by jezza


I don't think he has come out alright

Kate, PJ, Spencer and Johnny are going to vote for him now

And possibly Sophie because he'll probably annoy her all week

Still 4 votes is enough
”

Alex was always guaranteed 4 nominations... that is why this process was actually unfair to the winner, whoever it was! There was no right or wrong decision, but I say he'll come out OK beacuse on the whole he made the right choices. If he had split Spencer and PJ he would have been damned by one or the other anyways. I'd have liked to see Sophie in the poor sdie, but overall, as I say, Alex done good.
coolbeans252
16-06-2002
Had Alex chosen not to live with any1 on the rich side tonight, then tomorrow when the new male person comes to the house, he'll be stuck with him for the week...sharing the bedroom, had alex taken this into consideration, he may have chosen differently...we still don't know which way or how many ways he swings
jezza
16-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by GeoffH
I would have taken Adele, Spencer and PJ with me to the rich side. ”

Yeah that seems more sensible but I think he would have incurred the wrath of Jade which means he still would have got 4 votes from Kate, Johnny, Sophie and then Jade. mmmm... but on the other hand his side would have voted for Johnny so they may have gone heads up!!!
jezza
16-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by johnno

Alex was always guaranteed 4 nominations
”

I dunno, if he'd have put himself on the poor side with Kate, Johnny and Sophie as someone suggested he would have picked up 3 or less.
helios
16-06-2002
He could have chosen to live on the poor side on his own, that way no one would nominate him, they would be thinking of what a sacrifice he has made so everyone else can be rich!
kevraff
16-06-2002
Yes but being shacked up with Kate Jonny and Sophie would have given him the opportunty to pal up with them as he did with the others last week. Everyone would have seen him as a martyr figure.
Gavin-
16-06-2002
The noble thing to do in that situation would have been to remain on the poor side and choose 4 people for the rich side.

And the 4 people I'd have picked for the rich side would have been Jade, Spencer, Kate and Adele.

Leave PJ on the poor side because he's a twot.

But anyway, in the situation of being the winner, the noble thing would have been to stay on the poor side so that 4 other people can be on the rich side. I kinda dislike Alex for being so selfish, seeing as he was one of the people who coped *well* on the poor side.

About 45 minutes ago, I watched Alex sitting there looking smug, smoking a cigarette, talking about how easy it was to cope on the poor side and how he didn't mind it that much. While Spencer leaned against the bars looking pissed off... Spencer has spent days saying how much he can't stand being on the poor side.
fan-at-ic
16-06-2002
As someone else has suggested, Alex could have choosen to stay on the poor side and NOT choosen anyone to join him...as he sat there so excitted about "no more chickpeas" I was thinking that if he did this noble act for probably one week of which he's already said isn't so bad then he'd be sure to win the show I'd have thought? Plus, it seems to me that he'd be so much happier without having to share his precious space with anyone else? There'd be no one to tinkle on the toilet seat, no one to make smells near him, and no one to annoy his fragile sensibilities or fail to meet his high standards...

I think if he'd done this, he could have left the house to be carried on the shoulders of the crowd...
LC
16-06-2002
I'd choose only one person, Jade. That would result in both of us being nominated by the HMs but I feel I would not be voted out by the viewers as Jade would be favourite to be evicted.
Gill32
16-06-2002
seeing as he was one of the people who coped *well* on the poor side

As Alex said himself he didn't really enjoy the poor side he just got on with it and ate the food that was there. He didn't make a fuss and complain all the time so just for that reason he deserves to be on the rich side this time - Adele too.

Not too sure about Sophie though.
fan-at-ic
16-06-2002
Of all the people in the house, who do you think will make least of being in the rich side?

Alex: who has said he hardly drinks, doesn't smoke, doesn't want much more than chicken and pasta (he didn't get enough pasta on the poor side??)

Adele: who has said she hardly drinks, doesn't smoke, and doesn't want much more to eat than turkey, tuna and pasta.

Jade: will probably have a great time in the rich side

Sophie: Hardly eats and when she does its almost the same food as the poor side, hardly drinks, hardly smokes.

===

Jonny: loves his fry-ups and other fancy food, smokes, drinks etc

Kate: likes chocolate and rich food, smokes, drinks etc

PJ: craving meat so much I'm worried he'll eat his own left arm, doesn't smoke but drinks A LOT and enjoys it etc

Spencer: smokes and suffering from withdrawal (though BB has relented), enjoys good food, drinks A LOT and enjoys it etc.

Hmmmm, seems to me that this week could be much harder for the housemates than last week. Those on the poor side will be climbing the walls wanting good food etc and those on the rich side won't have a clue how to spend all the money and will be complaining about having eaten too much rich food etc.

If the poor side don't do something to get revenge I'll be surprised. Imagine being denied something only to have those that have taken "your place" squander the chance...
[FryGuy]
16-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Gavin-
And the 4 people I'd have picked for the rich side would have been Jade, Spencer, Kate and Adele.
”

Except he could only choose up to 3 to join him. The sensible choice would have been to have left Jade on the poor side. She has no nomination vote this week anyway, so unless one of his new room-mates on the rich side voted against him, he would receive only 3 votes from the others. Leaving Sophie on the rich side would make her the next obvious nomination target.

Anyway - if Alex and Sophie come up for public vote - who's more likely to go? Judging by most of the threads here, I'd say Sophie....who would be my choice also.
maisymouse
16-06-2002
I would have gone to the poor side on my own.
At least I probably wouldn't get evicted and the rest would have fun at my expence..:'( :'( :'(
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map