I feel that BigBrother3 has compromised their own rules. Waht do you think?

Has BigBrother incited Alex to break the rules, in allowing him to select 3 housemates to join him in the Rich side, surely this will indicate that he will not be nominating these 3 HM's and would also influence those selected not to vote Alex for eviction.

BigBrother rules are becoming very vague recently, a Long discussion by the Rich Housemates instructing newboy Tim in the nomination process, such when, who & why they nominate when they recieve the results of nominations, what Davina says and about the awful pause she leaves before stating the HM's up for Eviction, then the terrible anticipation on eviction night where they all wait for the news about who will be leaving.

Then the Poor side discuss "what if! we could nominate the newboy!, would'nt it be easier, cos' we don't know him?" BB enforces the discussing nominations rule, "HM's should not talk about Nominations, full stop!!"

are we getting conflicting rules for the 2 sides of the house?

what is the problem with this? surely anything one does in the house -- friendships, what and when one eats, whether one gets enough sleep -- may influence nominations. isn't that the point? to get through the entire time period without getting other housemates or the public so annoyed with you that you get voted out?

Yes, Agreed, but BigBrother rules state that HM's are not allowed to indicate to another HM their voting intentions.
OK BB has probably bent the rules to suit this new scenario, by conducting the selection process with the winner in the diary room, Alone!

But rules are being continually bent and ignored by BB.

Maybe it would be better to have NO rules at all!!!!!!
Stick them in the cages and see what they do?????