I am wondering what our choice in house mates says about britain as a whole. I read in The Mirror, at the beginning of the Big Bro craze, that more of the youth of britain vote for Big Bro than in the Election. This is no surprise. The article went on to say that the member of the house are a fair representation of the UK population.If this is so what does our choice of winner say about our aspirations. I was confused when Craig won because he was lazy until he was nominated twice and had to confront Nasty Nick then he was vain and conceited talking about his conquests and how popular he must be. I put it down to the Nasty Nick confrontation and how it was portrayed and promoted by the show.
Then we had fun loving full of life Brian. He was not afraid to ride with his crazy moments, he was mostly honest and very caring and inoffensive to most. His nominations I put down to the isolation of the house and not being able to escape him. If you watch him presenting SMTV he is basically the same person (minus the demons).
Now we seem to be leaning towards Spencer. Lets take a look at Spencer. Funny at times, laid back to the point of unenthusiastic (and PJ said Lee made him feel Lathargic), his mood depends on how much alcohol and tabaco is available to him, He is sexually restrained (re: his rejection of kate when he over heard her talk about almost getting into a threesome), lets not talk about the showering and feet.
Aside from his good looks I am struggling to find what we find in him that makes us want to make him our champion.
Enlighten me please.