• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Jade's porn
Gavin-
20-06-2002
I've seen a scan from the Sunday Sport of jade's glamour porn photo shoot. The Sport can't show proper porn of course, so you don't see the lower-body shots. but it's clear Jade did it all -- fanny pulled open and everything (sorry to be crude, I but I have to describe).

I was going to do the usual joke of saying, "Bleeeeuuuughh, pig porn! It's disgusting!".

But actually it just makes me sad. It;s unfortunate that she did this. Jade is a mildy retarded girl with a bad home life, and it is sad she fell into the trap of glamour photography. It just makes me feel sorry for her.
mynameischris
20-06-2002
er, thanks for that image...
northernslayer
20-06-2002
Ive seen them to. An image i would rather put out of my head!! I have to say though, as soon as i saw the photos i felt really sorry for her. In her conversation with Kate the other night she was saying 'why would you come into the house if you knew something was going to come out in the papers about you. You shouldn't come in if you have something to hide'

She might not be embarassed about that type of thing but SURELY she thought about them before she went in?! Did she not think about what her family/friends would think?
Loobi
20-06-2002
Are you sure it's her and not just someone elses body with her head digitally stuck on?
elliottm
20-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Gavin-
I've seen a scan from the Sunday Sport of jade's glamour porn photo shoot. The Sport can't show proper porn of course, so you don't see the lower-body shots. but it's clear Jade did it all -- fanny pulled open and everything (sorry to be crude, I but I have to describe).
”

must have been a telescopic lens

M
elliottm
20-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Loobi
Are you sure it's her and not just someone elses body with her head digitally stuck on? ”

no I'd recognise *kiss me lips* like that anywhere

M
hugon
20-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by Gavin-


But actually it just makes me sad. It;s unfortunate that she did this. Jade is a mildy retarded girl with a bad home life, and it is sad she fell into the trap of glamour photography. It just makes me feel sorry for her.
”

Proof?

It's up to her what she indulges in during her free time, if she's comfortable doing this, why should it bother anyone? I sincerely doubt she was badgered or tricked into doing anything.
MustGetOutMore
20-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by hugon


Proof?

It's up to her what she indulges in during her free time, if she's comfortable doing this, why should it bother anyone? I sincerely doubt she was badgered or tricked into doing anything.
”

You don't let a small child play with matches or go down Regent Street on their own. I don't think Jade is capable of rational decision-making. She is a very sad, fragile person who should NOT be on BB. I think BB need to rethink her involvement - and not just because of the Alele spat either.
beccie
21-06-2002
Jade proberly got paid good money for the shoot, so don't feel too sorry for her. I'm mean lets face having pictures taken off you naked isn't really that bad - I'd do it for the right price!
Darklight
21-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by beccie
I'm mean lets face having pictures taken off you naked isn't really that bad - I'd do it for the right price! ”

okay then ... £4.50.
minxy_21
21-06-2002
£5.00

Makum
21-06-2002
£5 and a big Mac afterwards (if your good!)
beccie
21-06-2002
But I would for £1000+, I really don't see the problem with getting money off of men who will part with hard earned cash to look at a picture. If anything it's the saddos who pay for it are being exploited not the girls. (note - I'm talking just straight one girl stuff here, before we get into a discussion about the really dodgy stuff)

But anyway next to me even Jade looks good...
Darklight
21-06-2002
Quote:
“Originally posted by beccie
But I would for £1000+ ”


..haggling are we?

Hmmmm £12.53...

okay before this goes too far. I sort of agree with you comments, however all but a fraction of the "mens hard earned money" just ends up going back the men who run the porn "industry", and not to the women.

Just because Jade may have been relatively well payed, does not mean she wasn't exploited (financially/physically/mentally)
barryg
21-06-2002
Actually, as I understand it, these were 'portfolio' shots. Girls wanting to get into glamour modelling (or any type of modelling) go to a photographer to get these shots done professionally. The girl pays the photographer. She then has some shots to hawk round the various agencies to show them what she can do.

However, I think I read that the photographer who took the pictures sold them to a newspaper. Now... he shouldn't have done this if the girl paid him for them (so perhaps he did them as a favour, or at a reduced rate so as to keep the copyright on the off chance that she became famous in the future), although the whole copyright issue surrounding professional photography and ownership of negatives is quite complicated anyway.
jook
21-06-2002
As far as I'm aware when a professional photographer takes a photo he owns the image not the person who is on it. He is entitled to do with it as he pleases.
Darklight
21-06-2002
entirely depends on the contract. (If there was one).
barryg
21-06-2002
If I pay a photographer to take my picture and state that the price I pay includes the negatives and all rights to the image - than I owe the image.

If I pay a photographer to take my picture and don't state the above, it's possible that I still own all future rights to the image.
Dr Who
21-06-2002
DId she sign a model release? Copy of a typical model release form...

http://www.photomentor.co.uk/release.html
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map