|
||||||||
The Conways :Total & utter Sh*te |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,325
|
The Conways :Total & utter Sh*te
How in gods name have these puddings got so far?
Singing-feeble,whiney and bland at best, hardly any harmonies Personality- pale yellow wallpaper, zzzzzzzzz Looks- pan-faced bumpkins They can't even move in time to their own singing, and look like they have never been on stage in their lives. How have they supported Westlife???? Why are they in this competition? Why do they make me so angry?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,412
|
agreed. i dont like them at all and as stated on anothe rpost they already have a record deal so its unfair they are there.and that lead singer is really shouty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beanbean
agreed. i dont like them at all and as stated on anothe rpost they already have a record deal so its unfair they are there.and that lead singer is really shouty.
They have a record deal?. Who is in charge of these record companies, Laurel and Hardy?
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,412
|
apparently they had one and they realeased an album. I have no idea who is in charge but the girls have no charisma they are dull.
Id rather chico stayed then them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,112
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icabod Crane
How in gods name have these puddings got so far?
Singing-feeble,whiney and bland at best, hardly any harmonies Personality- pale yellow wallpaper, zzzzzzzzz Looks- pan-faced bumpkins They can't even move in time to their own singing, and look like they have never been on stage in their lives. How have they supported Westlife???? Why are they in this competition? Why do they make me so angry? ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bradford
Posts: 140
|
Are they real sisters ?? I think they must be - only family would stick together being as awful as they are.......urghh
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,949
|
To be honest, I actually quite like them. They seem so happy and bubbly, and they make me smile. I thought they did great on Saturday. I wasn't a fan before, but I have warmed to them.
Although, I do think Simon should have put Eskimo Blonde through instead of them. And, The Brothers should have got through instead of Addictiv Ladies/4Tune. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,412
|
i liked eskimo blonde. Simon made a big mistake not putting them through they could have gone far. THey seemed like really down to earth girls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,252
|
Eskimo Blonde could have won the competition. The Conway Sisters are whiney, high-pitched and can't sing. I think Simon picked his acts at random.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,949
|
I think if Eskimo Blonde and The Brothers had got through, there is a chance that Simon would still have at least three of his acts left. He made such a huge mistake putting Addictive Ladies through. It was obvious even before the live shows that they would go first.
Eskimo Blonde just seemed to have it all. They were pretty good singers, they had a good image and personalities. I really think Simon made the poorest decisions. The only decent act he put through were Journey South. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,412
|
exactly, image and personality do count. And from what ive seen of conways they lack both.
Simons only hope of winning is journey south. (and even they may struggle) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icabod Crane
Looks- pan-faced bumpkins
Why are they in this competition? They are in this competition because they have every right to be just like all the others who are in now. I don't like or dislike them but they have improved their singing every week, so I'll give them credit where it's due |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 793
|
i think given the the acts on offer he actually had no choices. .......Basically if they could stay in tune for 40% of a song you was in.
I dont think the conways have much further to go in this comp maybe three weeks a t the very best |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,252
|
Journey South are good, but I don't like their personalities. I get the impression that they couldn't give a hoot. If they were up against Maria, Brenda, Shane, Nicholas or Andy, I think they would lose. They're better than Chico, The Conways and Chenai though. I give them 4 weeks.
![]() I wonder if Simon knows their names. I don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,412
|
i know journey souths names.
i only know the name of the shouty one in the conway sister, she comes across as a bit naggy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 576
|
All I know is the shouty one is Marie and the blonde one is Laura. The other two...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pencil
Journey South are good, but I don't like their personalities. I get the impression that they couldn't give a hoot. If they were up against Maria, Brenda, Shane, Nicholas or Andy, I think they would lose. They're better than Chico, The Conways and Chenai though. I give them 4 weeks.
![]() I wonder if Simon knows their names. I don't. I get the feeling that they take it very seriously and possibly spend more time than anybody else to make sure that they get every single little thing right. I imagine them to be serious music geeks who work their bollocks off in their free time while some other acts are having fun. I might be wrong, but it's just a sense I got before I even read your post. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,806
|
I thought they were very poor on the last show.
Yet the judges were far more complimentary to them than they were to other acts who I thought did better but got lukewarm praise such as Chenai. I think it was the lead singer from the Conway Singers who was poor, her main backing singer sounded much better, and had a nicer sounding voice. I thought that backing singer should have been the lead singer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: darn you pesky kids
Posts: 4,061
|
The lead singer seems a bit up herself and the blonde one doesn't look like her at all. And the other two look like the other 2 nolans that didn't do much after the 70's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,412
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrightmate
I think it was the lead singer from the Conway Singers who was poor, her main backing singer sounded much better, and had a nicer sounding voice. I thought that backing singer should have been the lead singer.
I als agree that certain other acts were better and yet didnt get as much praise I suppose the fact they are irish and have been managed by louis before means he will never slate them |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrightmate
I think it was the lead singer from the Conway Singers who was poor, her main backing singer sounded much better, and had a nicer sounding voice. I thought that backing singer should have been the lead singer.
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,112
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bettycat
The lead singer seems a bit up herself and the blonde one doesn't look like her at all. And the other two look like the other 2 nolans that didn't do much after the 70's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 37
|
The conway sisters official irish site is at www.theconways.ie it tell you about there irish album and single etc and has clips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 787
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beanbean
agreed. i dont like them at all and as stated on anothe rpost they already have a record deal so its unfair they are there.and that lead singer is really shouty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beanbean
...as stated on anothe rpost they already have a record deal ...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:35.



They have a record deal?. Who is in charge of these record companies, Laurel and Hardy?