I did not totally understand the task last night.
Could they have failed it??
Tim usually comes up with various level headed options they could do.

Was this task a fix??

Is Tim a plant to keep Jade in. He read the task out. He left the sofa area to get the lots when they were told not to leave the area. He made sure Kate and PJ drew lots first, (The short ones).

Could they all have refused to see a video of thier families and so avoid being up for eviction. Jade was the first to say,'No i do not want to see a video and go up for eviction'. If they all had gone down that road would they all have been up for eviction this week, or would they have just failed the Task and so have had to live on basic rations for the week and gone ahead with nominations as normal.

HOW could they have failed the task, does anyone know, if so please explain because I do'nt get it.

By the way I will not vote this week.

i dont think they could of failed??????
But then agian this task didn't feel like a task any way you just had to pick two people?

I think that is the point Webby... it simply was not a task was it? Excepting they had to choose 2 HMs for eviction, but how was that a task as we and love it? It was a total appalling mistake. And C4 will pay for the blunder... DON'T VOTE THIS WEEK!!!

If they had failed the task...

a) They would have had to live on basic rations for a week.

b) Nominations on Monday would have been reinstated.

I thought they could have been considered to have failed the task anyway as HMs left the sofa to collect items from the kitchen to allow the fiasco of the random selection.

So to sum it all up.... it would have been altogether better for us, the viewer, if they had failed...

Yes, agreed (and ultimately better for the housemates too)!

i'm not voting this week .

stuff em.